A nationwide comparison of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant disease

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 220, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 263-270.e1

  De Rooij, Thijs ^a   Jilesen, Anneke P ^a   Boerma, Djamila ^d   Bonsing, Bert A ^e   Bosscha, Koop ^f   Van Dam, Ronald M ^g   Van Dieren, Susan ^a   Dijkgraaf, Marcel G ^a   Van Eijck, Casper H ^h   Gerhards, Michael F ^b   Van Goor, Harry ^j   Van Der Harst, Erwin ⁱ   De Hingh, Ignace H ^k   Kazemier, Geert ^c   Klaase, Joost M ^l   Molenaar, I Quintus ^m   Nieveen Van Dijkum, Els J ^a   Patijn, Gijs A ⁿ   Van Santvoort, Hjalmar C ^a   Scheepers, Joris J ^o   Van Der Schelling, George P ^p   Sieders, Egbert ^q   Vogel, Jantien A ^a   Busch, Olivier R ^a   Besselink, Marc G ^a   more..

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^e LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^f JEROEN BOSCH HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^g MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^h ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

ⁱ Maasstad Hospital   (Netherlands)

^j RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^k CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^l MEDISCH SPECTRUM TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^m UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

ⁿ Isala   (Netherlands)

^o REINIER DE GRAAF HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^p AMPHIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^q UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL ABSCESS; ADULT; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREAS RESECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STOMACH PERFORATION; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PANCREATIC DISEASES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGEON; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC DISEASES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPENSITY SCORE; SURGEONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84923229946     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: 18791190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.11.010     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. A. Cuschieri, J.J. Jakimowicz, and J. van Spreeuwel Laparoscopic distal 70% pancreatectomy and splenectomy for chronic pancreatitis Ann Surg 223 1996 280 285
2. E.R. Winslow, and L.M. Brunt Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: A meta-analysis with an emphasis on complications Surgery 134 2003 647 653
3. A.H. Sain Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current "gold standard" for the treatment of gallstone disease Ann Surg 224 1996 689 690
4. C.D. Smith, C.J. Weber, and J.R. Amerson Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: new gold standard World J Surg 23 1999 389 396
5. M. Braga, C. Ridolfi, and G. Balzano Learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a high-volume hospital Updates Surg 64 2012 179 183
6. C. Ricci, R. Casadei, and S. Buscemi Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: what factors are related to the learning curve? Surg Today 2014 Mar 9 [Epub ahead of print]
7. C.S. Cho, D.A. Kooby, and C.M. Schmidt Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique? Ann Surg 253 2011 975 980
8. M. Abu Hilal, M. Hamdan, and F. Di Fabio Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study Surg Endosc 26 2012 1670 1674
9. R.F. De Wilde, M.G. Besselink, and I. van der Tweel Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality Br J Surg 99 2012 404 410
10. B. Topal, S. Van de Sande, S. Fieuws, and F. Penninckx Effect of centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on nationwide hospital mortality and length of stay Br J Surg 94 2007 1377 1381
11. P. Drymousis, D.A. Raptis, and D. Spalding Laparoscopic versus open pancreas resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis HPB (Oxford) 16 2014 397 406
12. T. Jin, K. Altaf, and J.J. Xiong A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy HPB (Oxford) 14 2012 711 724
13. A.C. Jusoh, and B.J. Ammori Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies Surg Endosc 26 2012 904 913
14. R. Venkat, B.H. Edil, and R.D. Schulick Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ann Surg 255 2012 1048 1059
15. S. Pericleous, N. Middleton, and S.C. McKay Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure? Pancreas 41 2012 993 1000
16. C.-J. Sui, B. Li, and J.-M. Yang Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis Asian J Surg 35 2012 1 8
17. P.R. Rosenbaum, and D.B. Rubin The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects Biometrika 70 1981 41 55
18. th SAS Users Group International Conference, Montreal, Canada 2004;1-11.
19. Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group participating medical centers. Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Available at: http://www.dpcg.nl/werkgroep/deelnemers.html. Accessed June 1, 2014.
20. W. Kimura, T. Inoue, and N. Futakawa Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein Surgery 120 1996 885 890
21. A.L. Warshaw Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy Arch Surg 123 1988 550 553
22. P.A. Clavien, J. Barkun, and M.L. de Oliveira The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience Ann Surg 250 2009 187 196
23. C. Bassi, C. Dervenis, and G. Butturini Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition Surgery 138 2005 8 13
24. M.N. Wente, C. Bassi, and C. Dervenis Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) Surgery 142 2007 761 768
25. M.N. Wente, J.A. Veit, and C. Bassi Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition Surgery 142 2007 20 25
26. A.J. Mangram, T.C. Horan, and M.L. Pearson Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999 Am J Infect Control 27 1999 97 134
27. The Royal College of Pathologists. Standards and Minimum Datasets for Reporting Cancers Minimum dataset for the histopathological reporting of pancreatic, ampulla of Vater and bile duct carcinoma. London R Coll Pathol 2002;(261035).
28. J.P. Vandenbroucke, E. von Elm, and D.G. Altman Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration Int J Surg 2014; July 18 [Epub ahead of print]
29. P.C. Austin Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples Stat Med 30 2011 1292 1301
30. D.A. Kooby, T. Gillespie, and D. Bentrem Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches Ann Surg 248 2008 438 446
31. J.M. Davies, M.P.N. Lewis, and J. Wimperis Review of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of infection in patients with an absent or dysfunctional spleen: prepared on behalf of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology by a working party of the Haemato-Oncology task force Br J Haematol 155 2011 308 317
32. S.S. Vijan, K.A. Ahmed, and W.S. Harmsen Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy: a single-insitution comparative study Arch Surg 145 2010 616 621
33. H.S. Tran Cao, N. Lopez, and D.C. Chang Improved perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: results from a population-based analysis JAMA Surg 149 2014 237 243
34. S.C. Kim, K.T. Park, and J.W. Hwang Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution Surg Endosc 22 2008 2261 2268
35. M. Abu Hilal, G. Jain, and F. Kasasbeh Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: critical analysis of preliminary experience from a tertiary referral centre Surg Endosc 23 2009 2743 2747
36. G. Balzano, A. Zerbi, and G. Capretti Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy Br J Surg 95 2008 357 362
37. S. Jayaraman, M. Gonen, and M.F. Brennan Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: evolution of a technique at a single institution J Am Coll Surg 211 2010 503 509
38. J. DiNorcia, B.A. Schrope, and M.K. Lee Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy offers shorter hospital stays with fewer complications J Gastrointest Surg 14 2010 1804 1812