Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: Can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique?

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 253, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 975-980

  Cho, Clifford S ^a,b   Kooby, David A ^a,c   Schmidt, C Max ^a,d   Nakeeb, Attila ^a,d   Bentrem, David J ^a,e   Merchant, Nipun B ^f   Parikh, Alexander A ^f   Martin, Ronald C G ^a,g   Scoggins, Charles R ^a,g   Ahmad, Syed A ^a,h   Kim, Hong J ^a,i   Hamilton, Nicholas ^a,j   Hawkins, William G ^a,j   Weber, Sharon M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b WILLIAM S MIDDLETON MEMORIAL VETERANS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BODY MASS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC LEFT PANCREATECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OPEN LEFT PANCREATECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREAS RESECTION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SPLENECTOMY; SURGICAL RISK;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ADENOCARCINOMA; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BODY MASS INDEX; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79954632733     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182128869     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, et al. Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg. 2008;248(3):438-446.
2. Baker MS, Bentrem DJ, Ujiki MB, et al. A prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surgery. 2009;146:635-645.
3. Weber SM, Cho CS, Merchant N, et al. Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: complication risk score correlates with morbidity and risk for pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(1):2825-2833.
4. Martin RCG II, Brennan MF, Jacques DP. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2002;235:803-813. (Pubitemid 34547298)
5. Bassi C, Dervenis MK, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8-13. (Pubitemid 40933766)
6. Lillemoe KD, Kaushal S, Cameron JL, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann Surg. 1999;229:693-698.
7. Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS, et al. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2002;183:237-241. (Pubitemid 34273977)
8. Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z'Graggen K, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2007;245:573-582. (Pubitemid 46555661)
9. Ferrone CR, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, et al. Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(10):1691-1697.
10. Goh BKP, Tan YM, Chung YFA, et al. Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg. 2008;143(10):956-965.
11. Stutchfield BM, Joseph S, Duckworth AD, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: what is the standard for laparoscopic surgery? HPB. 2009;11(1):210-214.
12. Nathan H, Cameron JL, Goodwin CR, et al. Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):277-281.
13. Johnston FM, Cavataio A, Strasberg SM, et al. The effect of mesh reinforcement of a stapled transection line on the rate of pancreatic occlusion failure after distal pancreatectomy: review of a single institution's experience. HPB. 2009;11(1):25-31.
14. Shoup M, Brennan MF, McWhite K, et al. The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2002;137(2):164-168. (Pubitemid 34142132)
15. Rodriguez JR, Madanat MG, Healy HG, et al. Distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation revisited. Surgery. 2007;151(5):619-625. (Pubitemid 46616933)
16. Allareddy V, Allareddy V, Konety BR. Specificity of procedure volume and in-hospital mortality association. Ann Surg. 2007;246(1):135-139. (Pubitemid 47012218)
17. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Marth NJ, et al. Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times. JAMA. 2003;290(20):2703-2708. (Pubitemid 37475598)
18. Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA Jr. et al. Variation in postoperative complication rates after high-risk surgery in the United States. Surgery. 134(4): 534-540.