Failure of large transformation projects from the viewpoint of complex adaptive systems: Management principles for dealing with project dynamics

Information Systems Frontiers

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 15-29

  Janssen, Marijn ^a   van der Voort, Haiko ^a   van Veenstra, Anne Fleur ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adoption; Complex adaptive systems; Design; Failure; Transformation; XBRL

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEM RECOVERY; DESIGN; DYNAMICS;

ADOPTION; COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; LOGICAL CONSEQUENCES; MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES; NETHERLANDS; PROJECT DYNAMICS; TRANSFORMATION; XBRL;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84923215228     PISSN: 13873326     EISSN: 15729419     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-014-9511-8     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alberola, J., Búrdalo, L., Julián, V., Terrasa, A., & García-Fornes, A. (2013). An adaptive framework for monitoring agent organizations. Information Systems Frontiers. doi:10.1007/s10796-013-9478-x.
2. Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216–232.
3. Auyang, S. Y. (1998). Foundations of complex-system theories in economics, evolutionary biology, and statistical physics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Besson, P., & Rowe, F. (2001). ERP project dynamics and enacted dialogue: perceived understanding, perceived leeway, and the nature of task-related conflicts. SIGMIS Database, 32(4), 47–66. doi:10.1145/506139.506145.
5. Bharosa, N., Janssen, M., Wijk, R. V., Winne, N. D., Voort, H. V. D., Hulstijn, J., & Tan, Y.-H. (2013). Tapping into existing information flows: the transformation to compliance by design in business-to-government information exchange. Government Information Quarterly, 30(Supplement), s9–s18.
6. Casti, J. (1994). Complexification: explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York: HarperCollins.
7. Daniels C.B., & La Marsh W.J. (2007) Complexity as a cause of failure in information technology project management. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE Daniels C.B., & La Marsh W.J. (2007) Complexity as a cause of failure in information technology project management. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE '07))
8. De Bruijn, H., Ten Heuvelhof, E., & In ‘t Veld, R. (2010). Process management; Why project management fails in complex decision making processes. Berlin: Springer.
9. Fairley, R. E., & Willshire, M. J. (2003). Why the vasa sank: 10 problems and some antidotes for software projects. IEEE Software, 20(2), 18–25.
10. Fu-Ren, L., Sheng-hsiu, H., & Sheng-cheng, L. (2002). Effects of information sharing on supply chain performance in electronic commerce. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 49(3), 258–268. doi:10.1109/tem.2002.803388.
11. Holland, J. H. (1996). Hidden order. How adaptation creates complexity. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
12. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–423. doi:10.1080/01944369908976071.
13. Janssen, M., & Kuk, G. (2006, 5–7 January). A Complex Adaptive System Perspective of Enterprise Architecture in Electronic Government. Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-39).
14. Janssen, M., Van Veenstra, A. F., Groenleer, M., Van der Voort, H., De Bruijn, H., & Bastiaansen, C. (2010). Uit het Zicht: Beleidsmaatregelen voor het versnellen van het gebruik van ICT-toepassingen voor administratieve latenverlichting. Delft: ACTAL.
15. Janssen, M., Veenstra, A., & Voort, H. V. D. (2013). Management and failure of large transformation projects: factors affecting user adoption. In Y. Dwivedi, H. Henriksen, D. Wastell, & R. De’ (Eds.), Grand successes and failures in IT. Public and private sectors (pp. 121–135). Berlin: Springer.
16. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
17. Johnson, N. F. (2010). Simply complexity. A clear guide to complexity theory. Oxford: Oneworld.
18. Koppenjan, J., Veeneman, W., Van der Voort, H., Ten Heuvelhof, E., & Leijten, M. (2011). Competing approaches in large engineering projects: the Dutch RandstadRail project. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 740–750.
19. Lewin, K. (1947). Quasi-stationary social equilibria and the problem of permanent change. In W. W. Burke, D. G. Lake, & J. W. Paine (Eds.), Organization change: a comprehensive reader. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Lewin, R., & Regine, B. (1999). The soul at work: unleashing the power of complexity science for business success. New York: Simon & Schuster.
21. Loukis, E., & Charalabidis, Y. (2011). Why do eGovernment Projects Fail? Risk Factors of Large Information Systems Projects in the Greek Public Sector: An International Comparison. 7, 2(59–77).
22. Lu, X., Liu, H., & Ye, W. (2010). Analysis failure factors for small & medium software projects based on PLS method Paper presented at the The 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (ICIME).
23. McAfee, & Andrew. (2003). When too much IT knowledge is a dangerous thing. MIT Sloan Management review, 83–89.
24. McConnell, S. (1996). Rapid Development: Microsoft Press.
25. Merali, Y. (2006). Complexity and information systems: the emergent domain. Journal of Information Technology, 21(4), 216–228.
26. Nan, N. (2011). Capturing bottom-Up information technology Use processes: a complex adaptive systems model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 505–532.
27. Nelson, R. R. (2007). IT project management: infamous failures, classic mistakes and best practices. MISQ Executive, 6(2), 67–78.
28. Orlikowski, J. W. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.
29. Pinto, J. K., & Mantel, S. J. Jr. (1990). The causes of project failure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37 (4), 269–276. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/17.62322.
30. Rodrigues, A. G., & Bowers, J. (1996). The role of system dynamics in project management. International Journal of Project management, 14(4), 213–220. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00075-5.
31. Rodrigues, A. G., & Williams, T. M. (1998). System dynamics in project management: assessing the impacts of client behaviour on project performance. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(1), 2–15.
32. Samoilenko, S. (2008). Information systems fitness and risk in IS development: insights and implications from chaos and complex systems theories. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(3), 281–292. doi:10.1007/s10796-008-9078-3.
33. Sauer, C., & Willcocks, L. (2007). Unreasonable expectations - NHS IT, Greek choruses and the games institutions play around mega-programmes. Journal of Information Technology, 22(3), 195–201.
34. Scott, J., & Vessey, I. (2000). Implementing enterprise resource planning systems: the role of learning from failure. Information Systems Frontiers, 2(2), 213–232. doi:10.1023/A:1026504325010.
35. Taleb N.N. (2007) The black Swan: Random House
36. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected; assuring high performance in an Age of complexity. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.
37. Willcocks, L. P., Currie, W., & Jackson, S. (1997). In pursuit of the Re-engineering agenda. Public Administration: An International Quarterly, 75(4), 617–649.
38. Yeo, K. T. (2002). Critical failure factors in information systems projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 241–246.
39. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.