Random forests to evaluate biotic interactions in fish distribution models

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 67, Issue , 2015, Pages 173-183

  Vezza, P ^a   Munoz Mas R ^a   Martinez Capel, F ^a   Mouton, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Barbus; Biotic interactions; Mesohabitat; Random forests; Species distribution modelling; Squalius

Indexed keywords

DECISION TREES; ECOSYSTEMS; FISH; PHYSICAL ADDRESSES;

BARBUS; BIOTIC INTERACTIONS; MESOHABITAT; RANDOM FORESTS; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELLING; SQUALIUS;

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); CYPRINID; DATA SET; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; HABITAT TYPE; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

SPAIN;

BARBUS; SQUALIUS; SQUALIUS PYRENAICUS;

EID: 84923186556     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Addicott J., Aho J., Antolin M., Padilla D., Richardson J., Soluk D. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 1987, 49:340-346.
2. Ahmadi-Nedushan B., St-Hilaire A., Bérubé M., Robichaud É., Thiémonge N., Bobée B. Areview of statistical methods for the evaluation of aquatic habitat suitability for instream flow assessment. River Res. Appl. 2006, 22(5):503-523.
3. Alcaraz-Hernández J.D., Martínez-Capel F., Peredo-Parada M., Hernández-Mascarell A.B. Mesohabitat heterogeneity in four mediterranean streams of the Jucar river basin (Eastern Spain). Limnetica 2011, 30(2):363-378.
4. Allouche O., Tsoar A., Kadmon R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J.Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43(6):1223-1232.
5. Araújo M.B., Rozenfeld A. The geographic scaling of biotic interactions. Ecography 2014, 37(5):406-415.
6. Arlinghaus R., Wolter C. Amplitude of ecological potential: chub Leuciscus cephalus (L.) spawning in an artificial lowland canal. J.Appl. Ichthyol. 2003, 19(1):52-54.
7. Armstrong J.D., Kemp P.S., Kennedy G.J.A., Ladle M., Milner N.J. Habitat requirements of Atlantic salmon and brown trout in rivers and streams. Fish. Res. 2003, 143-170.
8. Baillie J.E.M., Hilton-Taylor C., Stuart S.N. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. A Global Species Assessment 2004, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
9. Bain M.B., Finn J.T., Booke H.E. Aquantitative method for sampling riverine microhabitats by electrofishing. N.Am. J. Fish. Manag. 1985, 489-493.
10. Bain M.B., Knight J.G. Classifying stream habitat using fish community analysis. Ecohydraulics 2000, 2nd International Symposium on Habitat Hydraulics 1996, 107-117. INRS-Eau, Quebec City, Canada. C.H., M. Leclerc, S. Valentin, A. Boudreau, Z. Cote (Eds.).
11. Belmar O., Bruno D., Martínez-Capel F., Barquín J., Velasco J. Effects of flow regime alteration on fluvial habitats and riparian quality in a semiarid Mediterranean basin. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 30(0):52-64.
12. Bennett N.D., Croke B.F.W., Guariso G., Guillaume J.H.A., Hamilton S.H., Jakeman A.J., Marsili-Libelli S., Newham L.T.H., Norton J.P., Perrin C., Pierce S.A., Robson B., Seppelt R., Voinov A.A., Fath B.D., Andreassian V. Characterising performance of environmental models. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 40(0):1-20.
13. Bivand R. Package 'spdep' 2012, Available:, (accessed 21.12.12.). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spdep/index.html.
14. Boavida I., Santos J.M., Cortes R., Pinheiro A., Ferreira M.T. Benchmarking river habitat improvement. River Res. Appl. 2012, 28(10):1768-1779.
15. Bossard M., Feranec J., Otahel J. CORINE Land Cover Technical Guide - Addendum 2000 Technical Report No 40 2000.
16. Bovee K.D. AGuide to Stream Habitat Analysis Using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper 12 1982, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
17. Breiman L., Friedman J.H., Olshen R., Stone C.J. Classification and Regression Trees 1984, Wadsworth and Brooks, Monterey, CA.
18. Breiman L. Random Forest. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45:5-32.
19. Buisson L., Thuiller W., Casajus N., Lek S., Grenouillet G. Uncertainty in ensemble forecasting of species distribution. Glob. Change Biol. 2010, 16(4):1145-1157.
20. Capela J.R. Methodology for Establishing the Ecological Potential of Reservoirs in Spain, According to the Directive 2000/60/EC 2007, Faculdade de Ciências - Departamento de biologia animal, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
21. Carmona J., Doadrio I., Márquez A., Real R., Hugueny B., Vargas J. Distribution patterns of Indigenous freshwater fishes in the tagus river Basin, Spain. Environ. Biol. Fishes 1999, 54(4):371-387.
22. CEMAGREF EFI+ report. Improvement and spatial extension of the European Fish Index, Aix en Provence, France 2008.
23. Cheng L., Lek S., Lek-Ang S., Li Z. Predicting fish assemblages and diversity in shallow lakes in the Yangtze River basin. Limnologica 2012, 42(2):127-136.
24. CHJ Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar. Estudio general sobre la Demarcación Hidrográfica del Júcar 2007, CHJ, Madrid, Spain.
25. Clavero M., Blanco-Garrido F., Prenda J. Fish fauna in Iberian Mediterranean river basins: biodiversity, introduced species and damming impacts. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2004, 14(6):575-585.
26. Corbacho C., Sánchez J.M. Patterns of species richness and introduced species in native freshwater fish faunas of a Mediterranean-type basin: the Guadiana River (southwest Iberian Peninsula). Regul. Rivers Res. Manag. 2001, 17(6):699-707.
27. Costa R.M.S., Martínez-Capel F., Muñoz-Mas R., Alcaraz-Hernández J.D., Garófano-Gómez V. Habitat suitability modelling at mesohabitat scale and effects of dam operation on the endangered júcar nase, Parachondrostoma arrigonis (River Cabriel, Spain). River Res. Appl. 2012, 28(6):740-752.
28. Crivelli A.J. The Freshwater Fish Endemic to the Mediterranean Region. An Action Plan for Their Conservation 1996, Tour du Valat Publication, 171 pp.
29. Cutler D.R., Edwards T.C., Beard K.H., Cutler A., Hess K.T., Gibson J., Lawler J.J. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 2007, 88(11):2783-2792.
30. Davey A.J.H., Booker D.J., Kelly D.J. Diel variation in stream fish habitat suitability criteria: implications for instream flow assessment. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2011, 21:132-145.
31. Doadrio I. Atlas y Libro Rojo de los Peces Continentales de Espana 2001.
32. Doadrio I. Origen y Evolución de la Ictiofauna Continental Española. En: Atlas y Libro Rojo de los Peces Continentales de España 2002, CSIC y Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Madrid.
33. Doadrio I., Carmona J.A. Phylogenetic overview of the genus Squalius (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) in the Iberian Peninsula, with description of two new species. Cybium 2006, 30(3):199-214.
34. Drew C.A., Wiersma Y., Huettmann F. Predictive Species and Habitat Modeling in Landscape Ecology: Concepts and Applications 2011, Springer, New York, 328 pp.
35. Edwards T.C., Cutler D.R., Zimmermann N.E., Geiser L., Moisen G.G. Effects of sample survey design on the accuracy of classification tree models in species distribution models. Ecol. Model. 2006, 199(2):132-141.
36. Eisner A., Young C., Schneider M., Kopecki I. MesoCASiMiR: new mapping method and comparison with other current approaches. Final COST 626 Meeting 2005, 65-95. Silkeborg, Denmark.
37. Elith J., Leathwick J.R. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across Space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40(1):677-697.
38. Evans J., Cushman S. Gradient modeling of conifer species using random forests. Landsc. Ecol. 2009, 24(5):673-683.
39. Feio M.J., Aguiar F.C., Almeida S.F.P., Ferreira J., Ferreira M.T., Elias C., Serra S.R.Q., Buffagni A., Cambra J., Chauvin C., Delmas F., Dörflinger G., Erba S., Flor N., Ferréol M., Germ M., Mancini L., Manolaki P., Marcheggiani S., Minciardi M.R., Munné A., Papastergiadou E., Prat N., Puccinelli C., Rosebery J., Sabater S., Ciadamidaro S., Tornés E., Tziortzis I., Urbanič G., Vieira C. Least disturbed condition for European Mediterranean rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 476-477:745-756.
40. Ferreira M.T., Sousa L., Santos J.M., Reino L., Oliveira J., Almeida P.R., Cortes R.V. Regional and local environmental correlates of native Iberian fish fauna. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 2007, 16(4):504-514.
41. Fox J. polycor: Polychoric and Polyserial Correlations 2007, R Package Version 0.7-5, (accessed 03.04.10.). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=polycor.
42. Franklin J. Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction 2010, Cambridge University Press, New York, 338 pp.
43. Fredrich F., Ohmann S., Curio B., Kirschbaum F. Spawning migrations of the chub in the River Spree, Germany. J.Fish Biol. 2003, 63(3):710-723.
44. Freeman E.A., Moisen G.G., Frescino T.S. Evaluating effectiveness of down-sampling for stratified designs and unbalanced prevalence in Random Forest models of tree species distributions in Nevada. Ecol. Model. 2012, 233(0):1-10.
45. Fukuda S., Mouton A., De Baets B. Abundance versus presence/absence data for modelling fish habitat preference with a genetic Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy system. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184(10):6159-6171.
46. García de Jalón D., Torralva M.M., Lurueña J., Andreu A., Martínez-Capel F., Oliva-Paterna F.J., Alonso C. Plan de Gestión Piscícola de la Región de Murcia 1999.
47. Godinho F.N., Ferreira M.T., Cortes R.V. Composition and spatial organization of fish assemblages in the lower Guadiana basin, southern Iberia. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 1997, 6(3):134-143.
48. Gomes-Ferreira A., Ribeiro F., Moreira da Costa L., Cowx I.G., Collares-Pereira M.J. Variability in diet and foraging behaviour between sexes and ploidy forms of the hybridogenetic Squalius alburnoides complex (Cyprinidae) in the Guadiana River basin, Portugal. J.Fish Biol. 2005, 66(2):454-467.
49. Granado-Lorencio C. Ecología de Peces 1996, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla.
50. Grenouillet G., Buisson L., Casajus N., Lek S. Ensemble modelling of species distribution: the effects of geographical and environmental ranges. Ecography 2011, 34(1):9-17.
51. Grossman G.D., De Sostoa A. Microhabitat use by fish in the lower Rio Matarraña, Spain, 1984-1987. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 1994, 3(3):123-136.
52. Guay J.C., Boisclair D., Rioux D., Leclerc M., Lapointe M., Legendre P. Development and validation of numerical habitat models for juveniles of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2000, 2065-2075.
53. Guisan A., Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8(9):993-1009.
54. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer Series in Statistics 2009, Springer, New York, USA. second ed.
55. Hauer C., Unfer G., Tritthart M., Formann E., Habersack H. Variability of mesohabitat characteristics in riffle-pool reaches: testing an integrative evaluation concept (FGC) for MEM-application. River Res. Appl. 2010, 10.1002/rra.1357.
56. He Y., Wang J., Lek-Ang S., Lek S. Predicting assemblages and species richness of endemic fish in the upper Yangtze River. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408(19):4211-4220.
57. Hermoso V., Clavero M., Blanco-Garrido F., Prenda J. Invasive species and habitat degradation in Iberian streams: an analysis of their role in freshwater fish diversity loss. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 21(1):175-188.
58. Hermoso V., Januchowski-Hartley S., Linke S., Possingham H.P. Reference vs. present-day condition: early planning decisions influence the achievement of conservation objectives. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2011, 21(6):500-509.
59. Hirzel A., Guisan A. Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modelling. Ecol. Model. 2002, 157(2-3):331-341.
60. Ilhéu M., Costa A.M., Bernardo J.M. Habitat use by fish species in a Mediterranean temporary river: the importance of riffles. Proceedings 3rd International Symposium on Ecohydraulics 1999, Utah State University, Salt Lake City, CD-ROM.
61. Joyce M.P., Hubert W.A. Snorkeling as an alternative to depletion electrofishing for assessing cutthroat trout and brown trout in stream pools. J.Freshw. Ecol. 2003, 18(2):215-222.
62. Kemp J.L., Harper D.M., Crosa G.A. Use of 'functional habitats' to link ecology with morphology and hydrology in river rehabilitation. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 1999, 9(1):159-178.
63. Kottelat M., Freyhof J. Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes 2007, 646. Publications Kottelat, Cornol, Switzerland.
64. Lamouroux N., Jowett I.G. Generalized instream habitat models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2005, 62(1):7-14.
65. Liaw A., Wiener M. Classification and regression by Random Forest. R.News 2002, 2:18-22.
66. Maceda-Veiga A. Towards the conservation of freshwater fish: Iberian Rivers as an example of threats and management practices. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2012, 23(1):1-22.
67. Magalhães M.F., Beja P., Canas C., Collares-Pereira M.J. Functional heterogeneity of dry-season fish refugia across a Mediterranean catchment: the role of habitat and predation. Freshw. Biol. 2002, 47(10):1919-1934.
68. Maggini R., Lehmann A., Zimmermann N.E., Guisan A. Improving generalized regression analysis for the spatial prediction of forest communities. J.Biogeogr. 2006, 33(10):1729-1749.
69. Markovic D., Freyhof J., Wolter C. Where are all the fish: potential of biogeographical Maps to project current and future distribution patterns of freshwater species. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(7):e40530.
70. Martínez-Capel F., García de Jalón D., Werenitzky D., Baeza D., Rodilla-Alamá M. Microhabitat use by three endemic Iberian cyprinids in Mediterranean rivers (Tagus River Basin, Spain). Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2009, 16:52-60.
71. Matono P., Iihéu M., Sousa L., Bernardo J.M., Formigo N., Ferreira M.T., de Almeida P.R., Cortes R. Aplicação da directiva-quadro da água: tipos de rios portugueses com base na ictiofauna. VIII Congresso da Água 2006, Associação Portuguesa dos Recursos Hídricos, Figueira da Foz, Portugal. A. Hídricos (Ed.).
72. Mouton A.M., De Baets B., Goethals P.L.M. Ecological relevance of performance criteria for species distribution models. Ecol. Model. 2010, 221(16):1995-2002.
73. Mouton A.M., Alcaraz-Hernández J.D., De Baets B., Goethals P.L.M., Martínez-Capel F. Data-driven fuzzy habitat suitability models for brown trout in Spanish Mediterranean rivers. Environ. Model. Softw. 2011, 26(5):615-622.
74. Murphy M.A., Evans J.S., Storfer A. Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics. Ecology 2010, 91(1):252-261.
75. Olaya-Marín E.J., Martinez-Capel F., Vezza P. Acomparison of artificial neural networks and random forests to predict native fish species richness in Mediterranean rivers. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2013, 409(07):1-19.
76. Olden J.D., Lawler J.J., Poff N.L. Machine learning methods without tears: a primer for ecologists. Q.Rev. Biol. 2008, 83(2):171-193.
77. Oliva-Paterna F., Miñnano P., Torralva M. Habitat quality affects the condition of Barbus sclateri in Mediterranean semi-arid streams. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2003, 67(1):13-22.
78. Parasiewicz P. The MesoHABSIM model revisited. River Res. Appl. 2007, 23(8):893-903.
79. Parasiewicz P., Rogers J.N., Vezza P., Gortazar J., Seager T., Pegg M., Wiśniewolski W., Comoglio C. Applications of the MesoHABSIM simulation model. Ecohydraulics: an Integrated Approach 2013, 109-124. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. H.A., I. Maddock, P. Kemp, P. Wood (Eds.).
80. Pearce J., Ferrier S. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol. Model. 2000, 133(3):225-245.
81. Pires A.M., Cowx I.G., Coelho M.M. Life history strategy of Leuciscus pyrenaicus (Cyprinidae) in intermittent streams of the Guadiana basin (Portugal). Cybium 2000, 24(3):287-297.
82. Planque B., Loots C., Petitgas P., LindstrøM U.L.F., Vaz S. Understanding what controls the spatial distribution of fish populations using a multi-model approach. Fish. Oceanogr. 2011, 20(1):1-17.
83. Rosenfeld J. Assessing the habitat requirements of stream Fishes: an overview and evaluation of different approaches. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2003, 132(5):953-968.
84. Santos J.M., Godinho F.N., Ferreira M.T. Microhabitat use by Iberian nase Chondrostoma polylepis and Iberian chub Squalius carolitertii in three small streams, north-west Portugal. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 2004, 13(3):223-230.
85. Schill D.J., Griffith J.S. Use of underwater observations to estimate cutthroat Trout abundance in the Yellowstone river. N.Am. J. Fish. Manag. 1984, 4(4B):479-487.
86. Siroky D.S. Navigating Random Forests and related advances in algorithmic modeling. Stat. Surv. 2009, 3:147-163.
87. Smith K.G., Darwall W.R.T. The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Fish Endemic to the Mediterranean Basin 2006, IUCN - The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK, 41 pp.
88. Stockwell D.R.B., Peterson A.T. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecol. Model. 2002, 148(1):1-13.
89. Strayer D.L., Dudgeon D. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. J.N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2010, 29(1):344-358.
90. Strobl C., Boulesteix A.L., Kneib T., Augustin T., Zeileis A. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinforma. 2008, 9(307).
91. Svetnik V., Liaw A., Tong C., Culberson J.C., Sheridan R.P., Feuston B.P. Random Forest:s a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. J.Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43(6):1947-1958.
92. Teichert M.A.K., Kvingedal E., Forseth T., Ugedal O., Finstad A.G. Effects of discharge and local density on the growth of juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. J.Fish Biol. 2010, 76(7):1751-1769.
93. Valladolid M., Przybylski M. Feeding relations among cyprinids in the Lozoya river (Madrid, Central Spain). Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 1996, 43:213-223.
94. Vaughan I.P., Ormerod S.J. The continuing challenges of testing species distribution models. J.Appl. Ecol. 2005, 42(4):720-730.
95. Vezza P., Comoglio C., Rosso M., Viglione A. Low flows regionalization in North-Western Italy. Water Resour. Manag. 2010, 24(14):4049-4074.
96. Vezza P., Parasiewicz P., Calles O., Spairani M., Comoglio C. Modelling habitat requirements of bullhead (Cottus gobio) in alpine streams. Aquat. Sci. 2014, 76(1):1-15.
97. Vezza P., Parasiewicz P., Spairani M., Comoglio C. Habitat modelling in high gradient streams: the meso-scale approach and application. Ecol. Appl. 2014, 24(4):844-861.
98. Wisz M.S., Pottier J., Kissling W.D., Pellissier L., Lenoir J., Damgaard C.F., Dormann C.F., Forchhammer M.C., Grytnes J.-A., Guisan A., Heikkinen R.K., Høye T.T., Kühn I., Luoto M., Maiorano L., Nilsson M.-C., Normand S., Öckinger E., Schmidt N.M., Termansen M., Timmermann A., Wardle D.A., Aastrup P., Svenning J.-C. The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling. Biol. Rev. 2013, 88(1):15-30.