Abundance versus presence/absence data for modelling fish habitat preference with a genetic Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy system

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 184, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 6159-6171

  Fukuda, Shinji ^a   Mouton, Ans M ^b   De Baets, Bernard ^c  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Abundance; Data driven models; Genetic fuzzy systems; Habitat preference; Presence absence

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; DATA-DRIVEN MODEL; GENETIC FUZZY SYSTEMS; HABITAT PREFERENCES; PRESENCE-ABSENCE;

FISH; FISHERIES; FUZZY SYSTEMS; POPULATION STATISTICS;

DIGITAL STORAGE;

ABUNDANCE; FISH; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; HABITAT SELECTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; POPULATION DENSITY;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FISH; FUZZY HABITAT PREFERENCE MODEL; HABITAT PREFERENCE CURVE; HABITAT SELECTION; JAPAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; ORYZIAS; PERFORMANCE; POPULATION DENSITY; PREDICTION; PREVALENCE; TAKAGI SUGENO FUZZY SYSTEM;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BIOSTATISTICS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; FUZZY LOGIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORYZIAS; POPULATION DENSITY;

ORYZIAS LATIPES;

EID: 84866553201     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-2410-2     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adriaenssens, V., De Baets, B., Goethals, P. L. M., & De Pauw, N. (2004). Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management. Science of the Total Environment, 319, 1-12.
2. Beck, J. L., Dauwalter, D. C., Gerow, K. G., & Hayward, G. D. (2010). Design to monitor trend in abundance and presence of American beaver (Castor canadensis) at the national forest scale. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 164, 463-479.
3. Chefaoui, R. M., & Lobo, J. M. (2008). Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance. Ecological Modelling, 210, 478-486.
4. Cordon, O., Herrera, F., Hoffmann, F., & Magdalena, L. (2001). Genetic fuzzy systems: Evolutionary tuning and learning of fuzzy knowledge bases. Singapore: World Scientific.
5. Dedecker, A. P., Goethals, P. L. M., D'heygere, T., Gevrey, M., Lek, S., & De Pauw, N. (2005). Application of artificial neural network models to analyse the relationships between Gammarus pulex L. (Crustacea, Amphipoda) and river characteristics. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 111, 223-241.
6. Elith, J., & Graham, C. H. (2009). Do they? How do they? Why do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography, 32, 66- 77.
7. Elith, J., & Leathwick, J. R. (2009). Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 677-697.
8. Elith, J., Ferrier, S., Huettmann, F., & Leathwick, J. (2005). The evaluation strip: A new and robust method for plotting predicted responses from species distribution models. Ecological Modelling, 186, 280-289.
9. Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Anderson, R. P., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., et al. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29, 129-151.
10. Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874.
11. Fielding, A. H., & Bell, J. F. (1997). A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation, 24(1), 38-39.
12. Fukuda, S. (2009). Consideration of fuzziness: Is it necessary in modelling fish habitat preference of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes)? Ecological Modelling, 220, 2877-2884.
13. Fukuda, S. (2011). Assessing the applicability of fuzzy neural networks for habitat preference evaluation of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Ecological Informatics, 6, 286- 295.
14. Fukuda, S., & Hiramatsu, K. (2008). Prediction ability and sensitivity of artificial intelligence-based habitat preference models for predicting spatial distribution of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Ecological Modelling, 215, 301-313.
15. Fukuda, S., & Okushima, S. (2008). Assessing nonlinearity in fish habitat preference of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) using genetic algorithm-optimised habitat prediction models. JARQ-Japan Agriculture Research Quarterly, 42(2), 97-107.
16. Fukuda, S., Hiramatsu, K., & Mori, M. (2006). Fuzzy neural network model for habitat prediction and HEP for habitat quality estimation focusing on Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) in agricultural canals. Paddy and Water Environment, 4(3), 119-124.
17. Fukuda, S., De Baets, B., Mouton, A. M., Waegeman, W., Nakajima, J., Mukai, T., et al. (2011). Effect of model formulation on the optimization of a genetic Takagi- Sugeno fuzzy system for fish habitat suitability evaluation. Ecological Modelling, 222, 1401-1413.
18. Goldberg, D. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimisation, and machine learning. Boston, MA: Addison- Wesley.
19. Guay, J. C., Boisclair, D., Leclerc, M., & Lapointe, M. (2003). Assessment of the transferability of biological habitat models for Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 60, 1398-1408.
20. Hernandez, P. A., Graham, C. H., Master, L. L., & Albert, D. L. (2006). The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography, 29, 773-785.
21. Herrera, F. (2008). Genetic fuzzy systems: Taxonomy, current research trends and prospects. Evolutionary Intelligence, 1, 27-46.
22. Hiramatsu, K., & Shikasho, S. (2004). GA-based model optimisation for habitat preference of Japanese Medaka fish (Oryzias latipes) to streamflow environments. Paddy and Water Environment, 2, 135-143.
23. Hiramatsu, K., Fukuda, S., & Shikasho, S. (2003). Mathematical modeling of habitat preference of Japanese medaka for instream water environment using fuzzy inference. Transactions of Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Reclamation Engineering, 228, 65-72 (in Japanese with English abstract).
24. Leftwich, K. N., Angermeier, P. L., & Dolloff, C. A. (1997). Factor influencing behaviour and transferability of habitat models for a benthic stream fish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 126, 725-734.
25. Lek, S. (2007). Uncertainty in ecological models. Ecological Modelling, 207, 1-2.
26. Lek, S., Belaud, A., Baran, P., Dimopoulos, I., & Delacoste, M. (1996a). Role of some environmental variables in trout abundance models using neural networks. Aquatic Living Resources, 9, 23-29.
27. Lek, S., Delacoste, M., Baran, P., Dimopoulos, I., Lauga, J., & Aulagnier, S. (1996b). Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 90, 39-52.
28. Mäki-Petäy, A., Huusko, A., Erkinaro, J., & Muotka, T. (2002). Transferability of habitat suitability criteria of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 59, 218-228.
29. Mastrorillo, S., Lek, S., Dauba, F., &Belaud, A. (1997). The use of artificial neural networks to predict the presence of smallbodied fish in a river. Freshwater Biology, 38, 237-246.
30. Mouton, A. M., Schneider, M., Depestele, J., Goethals, P. L. M., & De Pauw, N. (2007). Fish habitat modelling as a tool for river management. Ecological Engineering, 29, 305-315.
31. Mouton, A. M., Schneider, M., Peter, A., Holzer, G., Müller, R., Goethals, P. L. M., et al. (2008). Optimisation of a fuzzy physical habitat model for spawning European grayling (Thymallus thymallus L.) in the Aare river (Thun, Switzerland). Ecological Modelling, 215, 122-132.
32. Mouton, A. M., De Baets, B., & Goethals, P. L. M. (2009). Knowledge-based versus data-driven fuzzy habitat suitability models for river management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 24, 982-993.
33. Mouton, A. M., De Baets, B., Van Broekhoven, E., & Goethals, P. L. M. (2009). Prevalence-adjusted optimisation of fuzzy models for species distribution. Ecological Modelling, 220, 1776-1786.
34. Mouton, A. M., Dedecker, A. P., Lek, S., & Goethals, P. L. M. (2010a). Selecting variables for habitat suitability of Asellus (Crustacea, Isopoda) by applying input variable contribution methods to artificial neural network models. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 15, 65-79.
35. Mouton, A. M., De Baets, B., & Goethals, P. L. M. (2010b). Ecological relevance of performance criteria for species distributionmodels. Ecological Modelling, 221, 1995-2002.
36. Mouton, A. M., Alcaraz-Hernandez, J. D., De Baets, B., Goethals, P. L. M., & Martinez-Capel, F. (2011). Datadriven fuzzy habitat suitability models for brown trout in Spanish Mediterranean rivers. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26, 615-622.
37. Nykänen, M., & Huusko, A. (2003). Size-related changes in habitat selection by larval grayling (Thymallus thymallus L.). Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 12, 127-133.
38. Nykänen, M., & Huusko, A. (2004). Transferability of habitat preference criteria for larval European grayling (Thymallus thymallus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 61, 185-192.
39. Nykänen, M., Huusko, A., & Lahti, M. (2004). Changes in movement, range and habitat preferences of adult grayling from late summer to early winter. Journal of Fish Biology, 64, 1386-1398.
40. Pearson, R. G., Raxworthy, C. J., Nakamura, M., & Peterson, A. T. (2007). Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: A test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 102- 117.
41. Pereira, G. C., Evsukoff, A., & Ebecken, N. F. F. (2009). Fuzzy modelling of chlorophyll production in a Brazilian upwelling system. Ecological Modelling, 220, 1506-1512.
42. Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M., Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Lehmann, A., Leathwick, J., et al. (2009). Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: Implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecological Applications, 19, 181-197.
43. Pino-Mejías, R., Cubiles-de-la-Vega, M. D., Anaya-Romero, M., Pascual-Acosta, A., Jordán-López, A., & Bellinfante- Crocci, N. (2010). Predicting the potential habitat of oaks with data mining models and the R system. Environmental Modelling and Software, 25, 826-836.
44. Silvert, W. (2000). Fuzzy indices of environmental conditions. Ecological Modelling, 130, 111-119.
45. Stockwell, D., & Peters, D. (1999). The GARP modelling system: Problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13, 143-158.
46. Stockwell, D. R. B., & Peterson, A. T. (2002). Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecological Modelling, 148, 1-13.
47. Takagi, T., & Sugeno, M. (1985). Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modelling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 15, 116-132.
48. Van Broekhoven, E., Adriaenssens, V., De Baets, B., & Verdonschot, P. F. M. (2006). Fuzzy rule-based macroinvertebrate habitat suitability models for running waters. Ecological Modelling, 198, 71-84.
49. Van Broekhoven, E., Adriaenssens, V., & De Baets, B. (2007). Interpretability-preserving genetic optimisation of linguistic terms in fuzzy models for fuzzy ordered classification: An ecological case study. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 44, 65-90.
50. Vanreusel, W., Maes, D., & Van Dyck, H. (2007). Transferability of species distribution models: A functional habitat approach for two regionally threatened butterflies. Conservation Biology, 21(1), 201-212.
51. Wisz, M. S., Hijmans, R. J., Li, J., Peterson, A. T., Graham, C. H., Guisan, A., et al. (2008). Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 763-773.