Managing the appropriability of R&D collaboration

R and D Management

Volumn 46, Issue , 2016, Pages 145-158

  Henttonen, Kaisa ^a   Hurmelinna Laukkanen, Pia ^b   Ritala, Paavo ^a  

^a LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923083104     PISSN: 00336807     EISSN: 14679310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/radm.12121     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ahuja, G., Lampert, C.M., and Novelli, E. (2013) The second face of appropriability: generative appropriability and its determinants. Academy of Management Review, 38, 248-269.
2. Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396-402.
3. Arranz, N. and Arroyabe, J. (2008) The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Technovation, 28, 88-100.
4. Arundel, A. (2001) The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy, 30, 611-624.
5. Bayona, C., Carcia-Marco, T., and Huerta, E. (2001) Firms' motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy, 30, 1289-1307.
6. Bekkers, R., Iversen, E., and Blind, K. (2011) Emerging ways to address the reemerging conflict between patenting and technological standardization. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21, 901-931.
7. Bengtsson, M. and Kock, S. (2000) 'Coopetition' in business networks - to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 411-426.
8. Boxall, P. (1998) Achieving competitive advantage through human resource strategy: towards a theory of industry dynamics. Human Resource Management Review, 8, 265-288.
9. Bönte, W. and Keilbach, M. (2005) Concubinage or marriage? Informal and formal cooperations for innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, 279-302.
10. Breschi, S., Malerba, F., and Orsenigo, L. (2000) Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal, 110, 388-410.
11. Cassiman, B., Di Guardo, M.C., and Valentini, G. (2009) Organising R&D projects to profit from innovation: insights from co-opetition. Long Range Planning, 42, 216-233.
12. Chang, Y.-C. (2003) Benefits of co-operation on innovative performance: evidence from integrated circuits and biotechnology firms in the UK and Taiwan. R&D Management, 33, 425-437.
13. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., and Walsh, J.P. (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 7552.
14. Davis, L. (2001) Profiting from innovations in digital information goods. In: Kocaoglu, D.F. and Anderson, T.R. (eds), The Role of Intellectual Property Rights, Technology Management in The New Knowledge Era. Management of Engineering and Technology PICMET '01. Portland International Conference. pp. 471-480.
15. Dhanaraj, C. and Parkhe, A. (2006) Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review, 31, 659-669.
16. Di Minin, A. and Bianchi, M. (2011) Safe nests in global nets: internationalization and appropriability of R&D in wireless telecom. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 910-934.
17. Duysters, G., Kok, G., and Vaandrager, M. (1999) Crafting successful strategic technology partnerships. R&D Management, 29, 343-351.
18. Fritsch, M. and Lukas, R. (2001) Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30, 297-312.
19. Gans, J.S. and Stern, S. (2003) The product market and the market for 'ideas': commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32, 333-350.
20. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., and Chesbrough, H. (2010) The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40, 213-221.
21. Ghauri, P.N., Tarnovskaya, V., and Elg, U. (2008) Market driving multinationals and their global sourcing network. International Marketing Review, 25, 5, 504-519.
22. Gómez, J. and Vargas, P. (2012) Intangible resources and technology adoption in manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41, 1607-1619.
23. Hall, B.H., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., and Sena, V. (2012) The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A literature review. NBER Working Paper Series, WP 17983.
24. Heiman, B.A. and Nickerson, J.A. (2004) Empirical evidence regarding the tension between knowledge sharing and knowledge expropriation in collaborations. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25, 401-420.
25. Henttonen, K., Ritala, P., and Jauhiainen, T. (2011) Exploring open search strategies and their perceived impact on innovation performance - empirical evidence. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15, 525-541.
26. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2009) The availability, strength and efficiency of appropriability mechanisms - protecting investments in knowledge creation. International Journal of Technology Management, 45, 282-290.
27. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. and Puumalainen, K. (2007) The nature and dynamics of appropriability - strategies for appropriating returns on innovation. R&D Management, 37, 95-112.
28. James, S.D., Leiblein, M.J., and Lu, S. (2013) How firms capture value from their innovations. Journal of Management, 39, 1123-1155.
29. Kamien, M., Eitan, M., and Israel, Z. (1992) Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. American Economic Review, 82, 1293-1992.
30. Kitching, J. and Blackburn, R. (1999) Intellectual property management in the small and medium enterprise (SME). Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 5, 4, 327-335.
31. Kuivalainen, O., Kyläheiko, K., Puumalainen, K., and Saarenketo, S. (2003) Knowledge-based view on internationalization: Finnish telecom software suppliers as an example. In: Von Zedtwitz, M., Haour, G., Khalil, T., and Lefebvre, L. (eds), Management of Technology: Growth through Business, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Pergamon Press. pp. 239-264.
32. Kumar, M.V.S. (2009) The relationship between product and international diversification: the effects of short-run constraints and endogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 99-116.
33. Kumar, N., Stern, L., and Anderson, J. (1993) Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1633-1651.
34. Lawson, B., Samson, D., and Roden, S. (2012) Appropriating the value from innovation: inimitability and the effectiveness of isolating mechanisms. R&D Management, 42, 420-434.
35. Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Alvin, K., Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 18, 783-831.
36. Lieberman, M.B. and Montgomery, D.B. (1988) First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41-58.
37. Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E., and Silverman, B.S. (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77-91.
38. Nieto, M. and Quevedo, P. (2005) Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort. Technovation, 25, 1141-1157.
39. Nooteboom, B. (2004) Governance and competence: how can they be combined? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, 505-525.
40. Okamuro, H., Kato, M., and Honjo, Y. (2011) Determinants of R&D cooperation in Japanese start-ups. Research Policy, 40, 728-738.
41. Olander, H., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., and Mähönen, J. (2009) What's small size got to do with it - protection of intellectual assets in SMEs. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13, 349-370.
42. Pavitt, K. (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343-373.
43. Pisano, G. (2006) Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Research Policy, 35, 1122-1130.
44. Ritala, P. and Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2009) What's in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition. Technovation, 29, 819-828.
45. Ritala, P. and Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2013) Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition - the role of absorptive capacity and appropriability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 154-169.
46. Rosenzweig, E., Roth, A., and Dean, J. (2003) The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: an exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 437-456.
47. Sáez, C.B., Marco, T.G., and Arribas, E.H. (2002) Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: an empirical study of Spanish firms. R&D Management, 32, 321-341.
48. Sampson, R.C. (2007) R&D alliances and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 364-386.
49. Saviotti, P.P. (1998) On the dynamics of appropriability, of tacit and of codified knowledge. Research Policy, 26, 843-856.
50. Teece, D.J. (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285-305.
51. Tether, B.S. (2002) Who co-operates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31, 947-967.
52. Todorova, G. and Durisin, B. (2007) Absorptive capacity: valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32, 774-786.
53. Van Dijk, M. (2000) Technological regimes and industrial dynamics: the evidence from Dutch manufacturing. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 173-194.
54. Vickery, S., Droge, J.C., and Calantone, R. (2003) The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 523-539.
55. Zander, U. and Kogut, B. (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organization Science, 6, 76-92.