Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy

European Urology

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 660-670

  Wallerstedt, Anna ^a   Tyritzis, Stavros I ^a   Thorsteinsdottir, Thordis ^b,c   Carlsson, Stefan ^a   Stranne, Johan ^d   Gustafsson, Ove ^a   Hugosson, Jonas ^d   Bjartell, Anders ^e   Wilderäng, Ulrica ^b   Wiklund, N Peter ^a   Steineck, Gunnar ^a,b   Haglind, Eva ^b  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^d SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Complications; Open; Radical prostatectomy; Robot assisted; Short term results

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; REOPERATION; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; DEVICES; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROBOTICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REOPERATION; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84923081687     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.036     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. A. Tewari, P. Sooriakumaran, D.A. Bloch, U. Seshadri-Kreaden, A.E. Hebert, and P. Wiklund Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy Eur Urol 62 2012 1 15
2. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and R.C. Rosen Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 62 2012 405 417
3. F. Montorsi, T.G. Wilson, and R.C. Rosen Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel Eur Urol 62 2012 368 381
4. M. Alemozaffar, M. Sanda, D. Yecies, L.A. Mucci, M.J. Stampfer, and S.A. Kenfield Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study Eur Urol 67 2015 432 438
5. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and W. Artibani Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies Eur Urol 55 2009 1037 1063
6. T. Thorsteinsdottir, J. Stranne, and S. Carlsson LAPPRO: a prospective multicentre comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Scand J Urol Nephrol 45 2011 102 112
7. L.H. Sobin, and C.C. Compton TNM seventh edition: what's new, what's changed: communication from the International Union Against Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer 116 2010 5336 5339
8. G. Steineck, F. Helgesen, and J. Adolfsson Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting N Engl J Med 347 2002 790 796
9. G. Steineck, K. Bergmark, L. Henningsohn, M. al-Abany, P.W. Dickman, and A. Helgason Symptom documentation in cancer survivors as a basis for therapy modifications Acta Oncol 41 2002 244 252
10. R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing 2005 R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria
11. E.A. Steinsvik, S.D. Fossa, K. Axcrona, P. Fransson, A. Widmark, and A.A. Dahl Do perceptions of adverse events differ between patients and physicians? Findings from a randomized, controlled trial of radical treatment for prostate cancer J Urol 184 2010 525 531
12. G.A. Sonn, N. Sadetsky, J.C. Presti, and M.S. Litwin Differing perceptions of quality of life in patients with prostate cancer and their doctors J Urol 189 1 Suppl 2013 S59 S65
13. M. Van Hemelrijck, H. Garmo, L. Holmberg, P. Stattin, and J. Adolfsson Multiple events of fractures and cardiovascular and thromboembolic disease following prostate cancer diagnosis: results from the population-based PCBaSe Sweden Eur Urol 61 2012 690 700
14. G. Gandaglia, J.D. Sammon, and S.L. Chang Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in the postdissemination era J Clin Oncol 32 2014 1419 1426
15. R. Veldkamp, E. Kuhry, and W.C. Hop Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial Lancet Oncol 6 2005 477 484
16. M.H. van der Pas, E. Haglind, and M.A. Cuesta Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 14 2013 210 218
17. F.R. Schroeck, T.L. Krupski, and L. Sun Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 54 2008 785 793
18. A. Bill-Axelson, H. Garmo, and M. Lambe Suicide risk in men with prostate-specific antigen-detected early prostate cancer: a nationwide population-based cohort study from PCBaSe Sweden Eur Urol 57 2010 390 395
19. F. Fang, K. Fall, and M.A. Mittleman Suicide and cardiovascular death after a cancer diagnosis N Engl J Med 366 2012 1310 1318
20. S. Carlsson, F. Sandin, and K. Fall Risk of suicide in men with low-risk prostate cancer Eur J Cancer 49 2013 1588 1599
21. A. Bill-Axelson, H. Garmo, and U. Nyberg Psychiatric treatment in men with prostate cancer - results from a Nation-wide, population-based cohort study from PCBaSe Sweden Eur J Cancer 47 2011 2195 2201
22. C. Okholm, J.P. Goetze, L.B. Svendsen, and M.P. Achiam Inflammatory response in laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastric cancer Scand J Gastroenterol 2014 1 8
23. Q.D. Trinh, J. Sammon, and M. Sun Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample Eur Urol 61 2012 679 685
24. S. Carlsson, A.E. Nilsson, and M.C. Schumacher Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital Sweden. Urology 75 2010 1092 1097
25. A.E. Krambeck, D.S. DiMarco, and L.J. Rangel Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques BJU international 103 2009 448 453
26. A. Tewari, A. Srivasatava, and M. Menon A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution BJU Int 92 2003 205 210
27. S.D. Chung, J.J. Kelle, C.Y. Huang, Y.H. Chen, and H.C. Lin Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) BJU Int 110 2012 E966 E971
28. M.S. Litwin, D.P. Lubeck, J.M. Henning, and P.R. Carroll Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database J Urol 159 1998 1988 1992
29. A. Mansson, L. Henningsohn, G. Steineck, and W. Mansson Neutral third party versus treating institution for evaluating quality of life after radical cystectomy Eur Urol 46 2004 195 199
30. P.A. Clavien, J. Barkun, and M.L. de Oliveira The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience Ann Surg 250 2009 187 196