Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: Results from the health professionals follow-up study

European Urology

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 432-438

  Alemozaffar, Mehrdad ^a   Sanda, Martin ^b   Yecies, Derek ^c   Mucci, Lorelei A ^d,e   Stampfer, Meir J ^d,e   Kenfield, Stacey A ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Health related quality of life; Open; Outcomes; Prostatectomy; Robotic

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER RISK; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

AGED; BENCHMARKING; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LINEAR MODELS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTORS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84922261859     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.039     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. K.B. Stitzenberg, Y.N. Wong, M.E. Nielsen, B.L. Egleston, and R.G. Uzzo Trends in radical prostatectomy: centralization, robotics, and access to urologic cancer care Cancer 118 2012 54 62
2. B. Duffey, B. Varda, and B. Konety Quality of evidence to compare outcomes of open and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy Curr Urol Rep 12 2011 229 236
3. D.C. Kang, M.J. Hardee, S.F. Fesperman, T.L. Stoffs, and P. Dahm Low quality of evidence for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a systematic review of the published literature Eur Urol 57 2010 930 937
4. W.T. Lowrance, T.V. Tarin, and S.F. Shariat Evidence-based comparison of robotic and open radical prostatectomy ScientificWorldJournal 10 2010 2228 2237
5. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and W. Artibani Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies Eur Urol 55 2009 1037 1063
6. K.J. Kowalczyk, H.Y. Yu, W. Ulmer, S.B. Williams, and J.C. Hu Outcomes assessment in men undergoing open retropubic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy World J Urol 30 2012 85 89
7. J.C. Hu, X. Gu, and S.R. Lipsitz Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy JAMA 302 2009 1557 1564
8. W.T. Lowrance, E.B. Elkin, and L.M. Jacks Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes J Urol 183 2010 1366 1372
9. Q.D. Trinh, J. Sammon, and M. Sun Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample Eur Urol 61 2012 679 685
10. R.A. Gardiner, J. Yaxley, and G. Coughlin A randomised trial of robotic and open prostatectomy in men with localised prostate cancer BMC Cancer 12 2012 189
11. W.V. Shappley III, S.A. Kenfield, and J.L. Kasperzyk Prospective study of determinants and outcomes of deferred treatment or watchful waiting among men with prostate cancer in a nationwide cohort J Clin Oncol 27 2009 4980 4985
12. P.A. Kupelian, M. Elshaikh, C.A. Reddy, C. Zippe, and E.A. Klein Comparison of the efficacy of local therapies for localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a large single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy and external-beam radiotherapy J Clin Oncol. 20 2002 3376 3385
13. S.J. Freedland, M.E. Sutter, F. Dorey, and W.J. Aronson Defining the ideal cutpoint for determining PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen Urology 61 2003 365 369
14. A.V. D'Amico, R. Whittington, and S.B. Malkowicz Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer JAMA 280 1998 969 974
15. M.G. Sanda, R.L. Dunn, and J. Michalski Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors N Engl J Med 358 2008 1250 1261
16. J.T. Wei, R.L. Dunn, M.S. Litwin, H.M. Sandler, and M.G. Sanda Development and validation of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer Urology 56 2000 899 905
17. N. Kamo, S.V. Dandapani, and R.A. Miksad Evaluation of the SCA instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with cancer care administered via paper or via the Internet Ann Oncol 22 2011 723 729
18. N.L. Shah, R. Dunn, and T.K. Greenfield Development and validation of a novel instrument to measure patient satisfaction in multiple dimensions of urological cancer care quality J Urol 169 Suppl 2003 11
19. K.J. Kowalczyk, J.M. Levy, and C.F. Caplan Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: results from the 100% Medicare sample Eur Urol 61 2012 803 809
20. W.T. Lowrance, J.A. Eastham, and C. Savage Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States J Urol 187 2012 2087 2093
21. Y. Kordan, D.A. Barocas, and H.O. Altamar Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy BJU Int 106 2010 1036 1040
22. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and S. Fracalanza A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution BJU Int 104 2009 534 539
23. S.B. Farnham, T.M. Webster, S.D. Herrell, and J.A. Smith Jr. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy Urology 67 2006 360 363
24. B. Rocco, D.V. Matei, and S. Melegari Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis BJU Int 104 2009 991 995
25. A.E. Krambeck, D.S. DiMarco, and L.J. Rangel Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques BJU Int 103 2009 448 453
26. G.B. Di Pierro, P. Baumeister, P. Stucki, J. Beatrice, H. Danuser, and A. Mattei A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload Eur Urol 59 2011 1 6
27. J.A. Smith Jr., R.C. Chan, and S.S. Chang A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy J Urol 178 2007 2385 2389 discussion 2389-90
28. M.A. White, A.P. De Haan, D.D. Stephens, T.K. Maatman, and T.J. Maatman Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program? Urology 73 2009 567 571
29. F.R. Schroeck, L. Sun, and S.J. Freedland Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy BJU Int 102 2008 28 32
30. D.A. Barocas, S. Salem, and Y. Kordan Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival J Urol 183 2010 990 996
31. S.M. Prasad, N.L. Keating, and Q. Wang Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy Urology 72 2008 647 652 discussion 652-3
32. A. Tewari, A. Srivasatava, and M. Menon A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution BJU Int 92 2003 205 210
33. J.B. Malcolm, M.D. Fabrizio, and B.B. Barone Quality of life after open or robotic prostatectomy, cryoablation or brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer J Urol 183 2010 1822 1828