The effect of training image and secondary data integration with multiple-point geostatistics in groundwater modelling

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 2943-2954

  He, X L ^a   Sonnenborg, T O ^b   Jorgensen F ^b   Jensen, K H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDROGEOLOGY; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC; GEOSTATISTICAL SIMULATION; MULTIPLE-POINT GEOSTATISTICS; MULTIVARIATE DISTRIBUTIONS; PROBABILISTIC CAPTURE ZONES; STOCHASTIC HYDROGEOLOGY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3-D) SIMULATION; UNCONDITIONAL SIMULATIONS;

DATA INTEGRATION;

DATA SET; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; GEOPHYSICAL METHOD; GEOSTATISTICS; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDROGEOLOGY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 84923061029     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-18-2943-2014     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bourges, M., Mari, J.-L., and Jeannée, N.: A practical review of geostatistical processing applied to geophysical data: methods and applications, Geophys. Prospect., 60, 400-412, 2012.
2. Carle, S. F. and Fogg, G. E.: Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics, Math. Geol., 28, 453-76, 1996.
3. Clement, W. P. and Ward, A.: GPR surveys across a prototype surface barrier to determine temporal and spatial variations in soil moisture content, Chap. 23, in: The Handbook of Agricultural Geophysics, edited by: Allred, B. J., Ehsani, M. R., and Daniels, J. J., American Society of Agricultural Engineers, CRC Press, 305-315, 2008.
4. Comunian, A., Renard, P., Straubhaar, J., and Bayer, P.: Threedimensional high resolution fluvio-glacial aquifer analog - Part 2: geostatistical modeling, J. Hydrol., 405, 10-23, 2011.
5. Comunian, A., Renard, P., and Straubhaar, J.: 3D multiple-point statistics simulation using 2D training images, Comput. Geosci. 40, 49-65, 2012.
6. Coz, M. L., Genthon, P., and Adler, P. M.: Multiple-point statistics for modeling facies heterogeneities in a porous medium: the Komadugu-Yobe Alluvium, Lake Chad Basin, Math. Geosci., 43, 861-878, 2011.
7. Delhomme, J. P.: Spatial variability and uncertainty in groundwater flow parameters: a geostatistical approach, Water Resour. Res., 15, 269-280, 1979.
8. Deutsch, C. V. and Journel, A. G.: GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide, Oxford University Press, New York, 1992.
9. Deutsch, C. V. and Wang, L.: Hierarchical object-based stochastic modeling of fluvial reservoirs, Math. Geol., 28, 857-880, 1996.
10. Doherty, J.: PEST: Model Independent Parameter Estimation, 5th Edn. of user manual, Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane, Australia, 2005.
11. Evan, R. A. and Mary, C. H.: Documentation of the hydrogeologicunit flow (HUF) package, US Geological Survey Open File Rep 00-342, US Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA, 2000.
12. Goovaerts, P.: Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation, Oxford University Press, New York, 483 pp., 1997.
13. Guardiano, F. B. and Srivastava, R. M.: Multivariate Geostatistics: Beyond Bivariate Moments, in: Geostatistics Tróia '92, Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, edited by: Soares, A., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 133-144, 1993. (Pubitemid 24391874)
14. Harbaugh, A. W., Banta, E. R., Hill, M. C., and McDonald, M. G.: MODFLOW-2000, the US Geological Survey modular groundwater model - user guide to modularization concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process: US Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-92, US Department of Interior, Reston, VA, USA, 121 pp., 2000.
15. Harrar, W. G., Sonnenborg, T. O., and Henriksen, H. J.: Capture zone, travel time, and solute-transport predictions using inverse modeling and different geological models, Hydrogeol. J., 11, 536-548, 2003. (Pubitemid 37450483)
16. He, X., Sonnenborg, T. O., Jørgensen, F., Høyer, A.-S., Møller, R. R., and Jensen, K. H.: Analyzing the effects of geological and parameter uncertainty on prediction of groundwater head and travel time, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3245-3260, doi:10.5194/hess- 17-3245-2013, 2013.
17. Henriksen, H. J., Troldborg, L., Nyegaard, P., Sonnenborg, T. O., Refsgaard, J. C., and Madsen, B.: Methodology for construction, calibration and validation of a national hydrological model for Denmark, J. Hydrol., 280, 52-71, 2003. (Pubitemid 37171966)
18. Hoffmann, J.: The future of satellite remote sensing in hydrogeology, Hydrogeol. J., 13, 247-250, 2005.
19. Hu, L. Y. and Chugunova, T.: Multiple-point geostatistics for modeling subsurface heterogeneity: a comprehensive review, Water Resour. Res., 44, W11413, doi:10.1029/2008WR006993, 2008.
20. Huysmans, M. and Dassargues, A.: Application of multiple-point geostatistics on modeling groundwater flow and transport in a cross-bedded aquifer (Belgium), Hydrogeol. J., 17, 1901-1911, 2009.
21. Huysmans, M. and Dassargues, A.: Modeling the effect of clay drapes on pumping test response in a cross-bedded aquifer using multiple-point geostatistics, J. Hydrol., 450-451, 159-167, 2012.
22. Høyer, A.-S., Lykke-Andersen, H., Jørgensen, F., and Auken, E.: Combined interpretation of SkyTEM and high-resolution seismic data, Phys. Chem. Earth A/B/C, 36, 1386-1397, 2011.
23. Johnson, N. M.: Characterization of alluvial hydrostratigraphy with indicator semivariograms, Water Resour. Res., 31, 3217-3227, 1995. (Pubitemid 26442611)
24. Journel, A. G.: Geostatistics: roadblocks and challenges, in: Geostatistics Tróia '92, edited by: Soares, A., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 213-224, 1993.
25. Journel, A. G.: Combining knowledge from diverse sources: an alternative to traditional data independence hypotheses, Math. Geol., 34, 573-596, 2002. (Pubitemid 41444752)
26. Journel, A. G.: Beyond covariance: the advent of multiple-point geostatistics, in: Geostatistics Banff 2004, Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, edited by: Leuangthong, O. and Deutsch, C. V., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 225-233, 2005.
27. Klise, K. A., Weissmann, G. S., McKenna, S. A., Nichols, E. M., Frechette, J. D., Wawrzyniec, T. F., and Tidwell, V. C.: Exploring solute transport and streamline connectivity using lidar-based outcrop images and geostatistical representations of heterogeneity, Water Resour. Res., 45, W05413, doi:10.1029/2008WR007500, 2009.
28. Liu, Y.: Using the Snesim program for multiple-point statistical simulation, Comput. Geosci., 32, 1544-1563, 2006. (Pubitemid 44283612)
29. Liu, Y., Harding, A., Abriel, W., and Strebelle, S.: Multiple-point simulation integrating wells, three-dimensional seismic data, and geology, AAPG Bull., 88, 905-921, 2004. (Pubitemid 39282418)
30. Liu, Y., Harding, A., Gilbert, R., and Journel, A. G.: A workflow for multiple-point geostatistical simulation, in: Geostatistics Banff 2004, Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, edited by: Leuangthong, O. and Deutsch, C. V., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 245-254, 2005.
31. Lubczynski, M. and Roy, J.: Hydrogeological interpretation and potential of the new magnetic resonance sounding (MRS) method, J. Hydrol., 283, 19-40, 2003. (Pubitemid 37435795)
32. Maharaja, A.: TiGenerator: object-based training image generator, Comput. Geosci., 34, 1753-1761, 2008.
33. Okabe, H. and Blunt, M. J.: Pore space reconstruction using multiple-point statistics, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 46, 121-137, 2005. (Pubitemid 40106452)
34. Okabe, H. and Blunt, M. J.: Pore space reconstruction of vuggy carbonates using microtomography and multiple-point statistics, Water Resour. Res., 43, W12S02, doi:10.1029/2006WR005680, 2007. (Pubitemid 351161998)
35. Pollock, D. W.: User's guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT a particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the US Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model (SuDoc I 19.76:94-464). The Survey Earth Science Information Center, Open-File Reports Section, distributor, 1994.
36. Rasmussen, E. S., Dybkjær, K., and Piasecki, S.: Lithostratigraphy of the Upper Oligocene - Miocene succession of Denmark, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin, Geological Survey of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, 22, 92 pp., 2010.
37. Remy, N., Boucher, A., and Wu, J.: Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS: A User's Guide, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
38. Scharling, P. B., Rasmussen, E. S., Sonnenborg, T. O., Engesgaard, P., and Hinsby, K.: Three-dimensional regional-scale hydrostratigraphic modeling based on sequence stratigraphic methods: a case study of the Miocene succession in Denmark, Hydrogeol. J., 17, 1913-1933, 2009.
39. Stisen, S., Sonnenborg, T. O., Højberg, A. L., Troldborg, L., and Refsgaard, J. C.: Evaluation of climate input biases and water balance issues using a coupled surface-subsurface model, Vadose Zone J., 10, 37-53, 2011.
40. Strebelle, S.: Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics, Math. Geol., 34, 1-21, 2002. (Pubitemid 41444773)
41. Strebelle, S. B.: Sequential simulation for modeling geological structures from training images, in: Stochastic Modeling and Geostatistics: Principles, Methods, and Case Studies, Volume II: AAPG Computer Applications in Geology 5, edited by: Coburn, T. C., Yarus, J. M., and Chambers, R. L., AAPG, Tulsa, OK, USA, 139-149, 2006.
42. Strebelle, S. B., Payrazyan, K., and Caers, J.: Modeling of a deepwater turbidite reservoir conditional to seismic data using multiple point geostatistics. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) Annual Conference and Technical Meeting, SPE 77429, San Antonio, TX, 2002.
43. Sørensen, K. I. and Auken, E.: SkyTEM - a new high-resolution helicopter transient electromagnetic system, Explor. Geophys., 35, 191-199, 2004.
44. Wingle, W. L. and Poeter, E. P.: Uncertainty associated with semivariograms used for site simulation, Ground Water, 31, 725-734, 1993.