Three-dimensional high resolution fluvio-glacial aquifer analog - Part 2: Geostatistical modeling

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 405, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 10-23

  Comunian, A ^a   Renard, P ^a   Straubhaar, J ^a   Bayer, P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Aquifer analog; Fluvio glacial; Heterogeneity; Hierarchical framework; Hydrofacies; Multiple point statistics

Indexed keywords

FLUVIO-GLACIAL; HETEROGENEITY; HIERARCHICAL FRAMEWORK; HYDROFACIES; MULTIPLE-POINT STATISTICS;

AQUIFERS; GLACIAL GEOLOGY; GROUNDWATER FLOW; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; SEDIMENTOLOGY; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ALGORITHM; AQUIFER; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA SET; FLUVIAL PROCESS; GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURE; GEOSTATISTICS; GLACIAL ENVIRONMENT; GROUND PENETRATING RADAR; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HETEROGENEITY; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MEASUREMENT METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; RESOLUTION; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SEDIMENTARY STRUCTURE; SEDIMENTOLOGY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 79959975039     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.037     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bayer P., Huggenberger P., Renard P., Comunian A. Three-dimensional high resolution fluvio-glacial aquifer analog: Part 1: Field study. Journal of Hydrology 2011, 405(1-2):1-9.
2. Boucher A. Considering complex training images with search tree partitioning. Computers & Geosciences 2009, 35(6):1151-1158.
3. Caers, J., 2005. Petroleum Geostatistics. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
4. Carle, S., 1996. A transition probability-based approach to geostatistical characterization of hydrostratigraphic archi-tecture. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California Davis.
5. Chilès J., Delfiner P. Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty 1999, Wiley, New York.
6. Chugunova T.L., Hu L.Y. Multiple-point simulations constrained by continuous auxiliary data. Mathematical Geosciences 2008, 40(2):133-146.
7. Cornaton, F., 2007. Ground Water: A 3-D Ground Water Flow and Transport Finite Element Simulator. Reference manual. Tech. rep., University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
8. de Marsily G., Delay F., Goncalves J., Renard P., Teles V., Violette S. Dealing with spatial heterogeneity. Hydrogeology Journal 2005, 13(1):161-183.
9. de Vries L.M., Carrera J., Falivene O., Gratacos O., Luit J.S. Application of multiple point geostatistics to non-stationary images. Mathematical Geosciences 2009, 41(1):29-42.
10. Guardiano, F.B., Srivastava, R.M., 1993. Multivariate geostatistics: beyond bivariate moments. In: Soares, A. (Ed.), Geostatistics: Troia '92, vol. 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 133-144.
11. Gumiaux C., Gapais D., Brun J. Geostatistics applied to best-fit interpolation of orientation data. Tectonophysics 2003, 376(3-4):241-259.
12. Haralick, R.M., Shapiro, L.G., 1992. Computer and Robot Vision, vol. I. Addison-Wesley.
13. Hu L.Y., Chugunova T.L. Multiple-point geostatistics for modeling subsurface heterogeneity: a comprehensive review. Water Resources Research 2008, 44(W11413):14.
14. Huysmans M., Peeters L., Moermans G., Dassargues A. Relating small-scale sedimentary structures and permeability in a cross-bedded aquifer. Journal of Hydrology 2008, 361(1-2):41-51.
15. Jussel P., Stauffer F., Dracos T. Transport modeling in heterogeneous aquifers: 1. Statistical description and numerical generation of gravel deposits. Water Resources Research 1994, 30(6):1803-1817.
16. Khan D., Strebelle S., Hanggoro D., Willis B., Pyrcz M. Non-stationary multiple point simulation to model complex deltaic deposits for flow simulation. Geostatistics Santiago 2008 2008, 217-226. Springer, Netherland. J. Ortiz, X. Emery (Eds.).
17. Koltermann C.E., Gorelick S.M. Heterogeneity in sedimentary deposits: a review of structure-imitating, process-imitating, and descriptive approaches. Water Resources Research 1996, 32(9):2617-2658.
18. Lajaunie C., Courrioux G., Manuel L. Foliation fields and 3D cartography in geology: principles of a method based on potential interpolation. Mathematical Geology 1997, 29(4):571-584.
19. Liu Y. Using the Snesim program for multiple-point statistical simulation. Computers & Geosciences 2006, 32(10):1544-1563.
20. Maharaja A. Stochastic modeling of the Rhine-Meuse delta using multiple-point geostatistics. Mathematics and Statistics 2005, vol. 14:653-659. Springer, Netherlands. O. Leuangthong, C.V. Deutsch (Eds.).
21. Maharaja A. Tigenerator: object-based training image generator. Computers & Geosciences 2008, 34(12):1753-1761.
22. Maji, R., 2005. Conditional stochastic modelling of DNAPL migration and dissolution in a high-resolution aquifer analog. Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo.
23. Maji R., Sudicky E., Panday S., Teutsch G. Transition probability/markov chain analyses of DNAPL source zones and plumes. Ground Water 2006, 44(6):853-863.
24. Mariethoz G., Renard P., Straubhaar J. The direct sampling method to perform multiple-point geostatistical simulations. Water Resources Research 2010, 46(11):W11536.
25. Renard P., Genty A., Stauffer F. Laboratory determination of the full permeability tensor. Journal of Geophysical Research 2001, 106(B11):26443-26452.
26. Rubin Y., Gómez-Hernández J.J. A stochastic approach to the problem of upscaling of conductivity in disordered media: theory and unconditional numerical simulations. Water Resources Research 1990, 26:691-701.
27. Straubhaar J., Renard P., Mariethoz G., Froidevaux R., Besson O. An improved parallel multiple-point algorithm using a list approach. Mathematical Geosciences 2011, 43(3):305-328.
28. Strebelle, S., 2000. Sequential simulation drawing structure from training images. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
29. Weissmann G., Fogg G. Multi-scale alluvial fan heterogeneity modeled with transition probability geostatistics in a sequence stratigraphic framework. Journal of Hydrology 1999, 226(1-2):48-65.