A practical review of geostatistical processing applied to geophysical data: Methods and applications

Geophysical Prospecting

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 400-412

  Bourges, Matthieu ^a   Mari, Jean Luc ^b   Jeannée, Nicolas ^a  

^a Geovariances ^*  (France)

^b IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES   (France)

Author keywords

Acquisition; Anisotropy; Data processing; Gravity; Modelling

Indexed keywords

ACQUISITION; GEO-STATISTICS; GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES; GEOPHYSICAL APPLICATIONS; GEOPHYSICAL DATA; GEOSTATISTICAL; GEOSTATISTICAL INTERPOLATION; GEOSTATISTICAL METHOD; GEOSTATISTICAL SIMULATION; GLOBAL TRENDS; GRAVITY SURVEY; GRIDDING; MODELLING; SEISMIC DATAS;

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; ANISOTROPY; DATA PROCESSING; GRAVITATION;

SEISMOLOGY;

ANISOTROPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURE; GEOSTATISTICS; INTERPOLATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC DATA;

EID: 84859444505     PISSN: 00168025     EISSN: 13652478     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00992.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. th SEG meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1218-1222.
2. Chilès J.P. and Delfiner P. 1999. Geostatistics Modelling Spatial Uncertainty. Wiley.
3. Chilès J.P. and Guillen A. 1984. Variogrammes et krigeages pour la gravimétrie et le magnétisme. Sciences de la Terre, Série Informatique Géologique 20, 455-468.
4. Deraisme et al. 2009. ISATIS Case Studies. Geovariances & Ecole des Mines de Paris, version 9, 724p.
5. Doyen P.M. 2007. Seismic Reservoir Characterization: An Earth Modelling Perspective. EAGE.
6. Dubrule O. 2003. Geostatistics for Seismic Data Integration on Earth Models, Distinguished Instructor Series, N°6. SEG/EAGE.
7. Hagedoorn G.J. 1959. The plus-minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections. Geophysical Prospecting 7, 158-182.
8. nd EAGE meeting, Barcelona, Spain, Expanded Abstracts, M034.
9. Mari J.L. and Porel G. 2007. 3D seismic imaging of a near-surface heterogeneous aquifer: A case study. Oil and Gas Science and Technology 63, 179-201. doi:
10. Matheron G. 1982. Pour une analyse krigeante des données régionalisées. Internal report N-732, Centre de Géostatistique et de Morphologie Mathématique, Ecole des Mines de Paris
11. Olivier R.J. and Simard R.G. 1981. Improvement of the conic prism model for terraincorrection in rugged topography. Geophysics 46, 1054-1056.
12. th SEG meeting, Denver, Colorado, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1654-1657.
13. Vesnaver A., Bridle R., Henry B., Ley II R., Rowe W. and Wyllie A. 2006. Geostatistical integration of near-surface geophysical data. Geophysical Prospecting 54, 667-680.
14. Yarus J.M. and Chambers R.L. 2006. Practical geostatistics - An armchair overview for petroleum reservoir engineers. Journal of Petroleum Technology 58, 78-86.