Creating research impact: The roles of research users in interactive research mobilisation

Evidence and Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 35-55

  Morton, Sarah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evidence based policy; Impact assessment; Research impact; Research utilisation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922922752     PISSN: 17442648     EISSN: 17442656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1332/174426514X13976529631798     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, 2003, Hidden harm: Responding to the needs of children of problem drug users, www.scotland.gov.uk 0027764.pdf, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive
2. Bartunek, J, Trullen, J, Bonet, E, Sauquet, A, 2003, Sharing and expanding academic and practitioner knowledge in health care, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 8, 2, 62-9
3. Bell, S, Shaw, B, Boaz, A, 2011, Real-world approaches to assessing the impact of environmental research on policy, Research Evaluation 20, 3, 227-37
4. Best, A, Holmes, B, 2010, Systems thinking, knowledge and action: Towards better models and methods, Evidence & Policy 6, 145-59
5. Boaz, A, Fitzpatrick, S, Shaw, B, 2009, Assessing the impact of research on policy: A literature review, Science and Public Policy 36, 4, 255-70
6. Bryman, A, 2004, Social research methods, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press
7. Court, J, Young, J, 2004, Bridging research and policy in international development: An analytical and practical framework, Research and policy in development programme briefing paper, London: Overseas Development Institute
8. Creswell, JW, 1994, Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, London: Sage
9. Crew, E, Young, J (eds), 2002, Bridging research and policy: Context, evidence, links, ODI working paper 173, London: Overseas Development Institute
10. Daley, BJ, 2001, Learning and professional practice: A study of four professions, Adult Education Quarterly 52, 1, 39-54
11. Denis, JL, Lomas, J, 2003, Convergent evolution: The academic and policy roots of collaborative research, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 8, Suppl 2, 1-6
12. Donovan, C, 2008, The Australian research quality framework: A live experiment in capturing the social, economic, environmental, and cultural returns of publicly funded research, New Directions for Evaluation 118, 47-60
13. Eisenhardt, KM, 2002, Building theories from case study research, in Huberman, AM, Miles, MB (eds), The qualitative researcher's companion, London: Sage
14. ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council), 2009, Taking stock: A summary of ESRC's work to evaluate the impact of research on policy and practice, ESRC, www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Taking%20Stock_tcm8-4545.pdf
15. Grant, J, Cottrell, R, Cluzeau, F, Fawcett, G 2000, Evaluating 'payback' on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: Applied bibliometric study, BMJ 320, 1107-11
16. Haas, PM, 1992, Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination, International Organization, 46, 1-35
17. Hanney, S, Gonzalez-Block, MA, Buxton, MJ, Kogan, M, 2003, The utilisation of health research in policy-making: Concepts, examples and methods of assessment, Health Research Policy and Systems 1, 1, 2
18. Hepburn, E, 2009, Knowledge and policy: A regional perspective, paper presented to Knowledge and Policy Academic Exchange, University of Edinburgh
19. Kingdon, JW, 1995, Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd edn), New York: Harper Collins
20. Knight, P 2002, Small scale research, London: Sage
21. Macduff, N, Netting, FE, 2000, Lessons learned from a practitioner-academician collaboration, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 29, 1, 46-60
22. Martin, S, 2010, Co-production of social research: Strategies for engaged scholarship, Public Money and Management 30, 4, 211-18
23. Meagher, L, Lyall, C, Nutley, S, 2008, Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: A method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science research, Research Evaluation 17, 3, 163-73
24. Molas-Gallart, J, Tang, P, 2011, Tracing productive interactions to identify social impacts: An example from the social sciences, Research Evaluation 20, 3, 219-26
25. Monaghan, M, 2008, Appreciating cannabis: The paradox of evidence in evidence-based policy-making, Evidence & Policy 4, 2, 209-31
26. Nutley, S, Walter, I, Davies, HTO, 2007, Using evidence: How research can inform public services, Bristol: Policy Press
27. Research Councils UK, 2011, Excellence with impact, www.rcuk.ac.uk/Publications/archive/ExcellencewithImpact
28. Richards, L, 2005, Handling qualitative data: A practical guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
29. Sabatier, PA, Jenkins-Smith, HC, 1993, Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach, Boulder, CO: Westview Press
30. Scottish Executive, 2001, Plan for action on alcohol problems, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive
31. Scottish Executive, 2004, Response to the report of the inquiry by the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/health/hhser.pdf, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive
32. Scottish Government, 2008, Changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol: A discussion paper on our strategic approach, Edinburgh: Scottish Government
33. Scottish Government, 2009, Changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol: A framework for action, Edinburgh: Scottish Government
34. Silverman, D, 2001, Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction (2nd edn), London: Sage
35. Spaapen, J, van Drooge, L, 2011, Introducing productive interactions in social impact assessment, Research Evaluation 20, 3, 211-18
36. Vestri, P, Health and Community Care Research Programme, Scottish Government, Analysis of responses to the consultation on the Scottish Government's strategic approach to changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol, www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2009/02/24154414/0, Edinburgh: Scottish Government
37. Walter, I, Davies, H, Nutley, S, 2003, Increasing research impact through partnerships: Evidence from outside health care, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 8, Suppl 2, 58-61
38. Walter, I, Nutley, SM, Davies, HTO, 2005, What works to promote evidence-based practice? A cross sector review, Evidence & Policy 1, 3, 335-64
39. Weiss, CH, 1979, The many meanings of research utilisation, Public Administration Review 39, 5, 426-31
40. Williams, I, 2011, Receptive contexts and the role of knowledge management in evidence-based practice, in Glasby, J (ed), Evidence, policy and practice: Critical perspectives in health and social care, Bristol: Policy Press