Language and human relations: Styles of address in contemporary language

Language and Human Relations: Styles of Address in Contemporary Language

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-183

  Clyne, Michael ^a   Norrby, Catrin ^a   Warren, Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922850938     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511576690     Document Type: Book

References (150)

1. Adams, George Brendan. 1985. Linguistic cross-links in phonology and grammar. In S.O&Baoill (ed.). Papers on Irish English, 27-35. Dublin: IRAAL.
2. Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Ahlgren, Perry. 1978. Tilltalsordet ni. Dess semantik och anvandning i historiskt per-spektiv. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.
4. Allensbach. 2003. Weniger schnell per ‘du’. Allensbacher Berichte 9/2003. www.ifd-allensbach.de/pdf/prd_0309.pdf (last accessed 15 December 2007).
5. Amendt, Gerhard. 1995. Du oder Sie: 1945-1968-1995. Bremen: Ikaru-Verlag. Ammon, Ulrich et al. 2004. Variantenworterbuch des Deutschen. Berlin: De Gruyter. Bakhtin, Michael. 1986. The problems of speech genres. In Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael (eds.). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
6. Bargiela, Francesca, Corinne Boz, Lily Gokzadze, Abdurrahman Hamza, Sara Mills and Nino Rukhadze. 2002. Ethnocentrism, politeness and naming strategies. Working Papers on the Web 3: Linguistic politeness and context. www.shu.ac.uk/wpw/politeness/bargiela.htm (last accessed 15 December 2007).
7. Barthes, Roland. 1971. Ecrivains, intellectuels, professeurs. Tel quel, 47: 1-15.
8. Bayer, Klaus. 1979. Die Anredepromina Du und Sie. Deutsche Sprache, 3: 212-19. Behrens, Leila. 2007. Konservierung von Stereotypen mit Hilfe der Statistik: Geert Hofstede und sein kulturvergleichendes Modell. Arbeitspapier 51, Neue Folge. Cologne: Institut fur Linguistik, Universitat.
9. Besch, Werner. 1998. II Duzen, Siezen, Titulierem. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
10. Birch, Barbara M. 1995. Quaker Plain Speech: A policy of linguistic divergence. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 116: 39-59.
11. Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms ofAddress: Problems ofpatterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.). Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 253-76. Calvet, Louis-Jean. 1976. A tu et a vous. Le Franqais dans le Monde, 118: 14-18. Clark, Herbert. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Clyne, Michael (ed.). 1992. Pluricentric Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
14. Clyne, Michael. 1995. The German Language in a Changing Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Clyne, Michael. 2006. Some thoughts on pragmatics, sociolinguistic variation and intercultural communication. InterculturalPragmatics, 3: 95-105.
16. Clyne, Michael and Sandra Kipp. 1999. Pluricentric Languages in an Immigrant Context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Clyne, Michael and Sandra Kipp. 2006. Tiles in a Multilingual Mosaic: Macedonian, Somali and Filipino in Melbourne. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
18. Clyne, Michael, Sue Fernandez and Rudolf Muhr. 2003. Communicative styles in a contact situation. Journal of German Linguistics, 15: 95-154.
19. Clyne, Michael, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby and Doris Schupbach. 2006. Perceptions of variation and change in German and Swedish address. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10 (3): 287-319.
20. Coffen, Beatrice. 2002. Histoire culturelle des pronoms d&adresse. Vers une typologie des systemes allocutoires dans les langues romanes. Paris: Honore Champion.
21. Coffen, Beatrice. 2003. Role attribue aux pronoms d&adresse dans la construction identitaire individuelle. Paper presented at the Colloquium Pronoms du 2epersonne etformes d&adresse dans les langues d&Europe, 6-8 March 2003, Institut Cervantes, Paris.
22. Coupland, Nikolas. 2001. Language, situation and the relational self: Theorizing dialect-style in sociolinguistics. In Penelope Eckert and John R. Rickford (eds.). Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 185-210.
23. Crowley, Terry. 2000. The Politics of Language in Ireland, 1366-1922. London: Routledge.
24. Crumley, Bruce. 2006. Pardon your French. Hit or miss? A formal debate forms over the correct form of address. Time Europe, 30 April.
25. Crystal, David. 1993. Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Davies, Bronwyn and Rom Harre. 1990. Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20 (1): 43-63.
27. Eckert, Penelope and John R. Rickford (eds.). 2001. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Ehlers, Klaas-Hinrich. 2004. Zur Anrede mit Titeln in Deutschland, Osterreich und Tschechien. Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenerhebung. Brucken. Germanistisches Jahrbuch Tschechien-Slowakei NF.12: 85-115.
29. Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1986. On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In John J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes (eds.). Directions in Sociolinguistics: The ethnography ofcommunication. Reissued with corrections and additions, Oxford: Blackwell. 213-50.
30. Filppula, Markku. 1999. The Grammar ofIrish English: Language in Hibernian style. London, New York: Routledge.
31. Fishman, Joshua A. 1965. Who speaks what language to whom and when? Linguistique, 2: 67-88.
32. Formentelli, Maicol. 2007. The vocative mate in contemporary English: A corpus based study. In A. Sanso (ed.). Language Resources and Linguistic Theory. Milan: Franco Angeli. 180-99.
33. Fraser, Bruce. 1990. Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14: 219-36.
34. Fraser, Bruce and William Nolen. 1981. The association of deference with linguistic form. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27: 93-110.
35. Fremer, Maria. 1998. Tilltal och omtal i samtal. Sprakbruk, 2: 5-10.
36. Folktinget. 2003. Sprakfordelningen i Svenskfinland. www.kaapeli.fi/~fti/pdf7publikationer/ Sprakfordelningen2003.pdf (last accessed 28 April 2007).
37. Gardner-Chloros, Penelope. 1991. Ni tu ni vous: Principes et paradoxes dans l&emploi des pronoms d&allocution en fransais contemporain. Journal of French Language Studies, 1 (1): 139-55.
38. Gardner-Chloros, Penelope. 2004. Le developpement historique de T7V en fransais et en anglais: Parallelisme et divergence. Franco-British Studies 33-34 (Autumn 2003-Spring 2004). Special Issue: Second person pronouns and forms of address in the languages of contemporary Europe. 90-99.
39. Gardner-Chloros, Penelope. 2007. Tu/vous choices: An ‘Act of Identity’? In Mari Jones and Wendy Ayres-Bennett (eds.). The French Language and Questions of Identity. Oxford: Legenda. 106-16.
40. Gartner, Detlev. 1992. Vom Sekretarsdeutsch zur Kommerzsprache. In Gotthard Lerchner (ed.). Sprachkultur im Wandel. Anmerkungen zur Kommunikationskultur. Frankfurt: Lang. 203-62.
41. Giles, Howard (ed.). 1984. The dynamics of speech accommodation. Special Issue. International Journal ofthe Sociology ofLanguage, 46.
42. Giles, Howard, Nikolas Coupland and Justine Coupland. 1991. Accommodation theory: Communication, context and consequence. In Howard Giles, Nikolas Coupland and Justine Coupland (eds.). Contexts of Accommodation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1-67.
43. Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
44. Goffman, Erving. 1967. On face-work. An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In Erving Goffman (ed.). Interactional Ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. New York: Anchor Books. 5-45.
45. Graddol, David and Joan Swan. 1989. Gender Voices. Oxford: Blackwell and Open University.
46. Greater London Authority. 2006a. Greater London Demographic Review 2005. London: Date Management and Analysis Group, Greater London Authority. www.london. gov.uk/gla/publications/factsandfigures/factsfigures/population.jsp (last accessed 23 March 2007).
47. Greater London Authority. 2006b. A Summary of Countries of Birth in London. DMAG Update. www.london.gov.uk/gla/publications/factsandfigures/dmag-update-2006-09. pdf (last accessed 9 April 2007).
48. Greenbaum, Thomas L. 1998. The Handbook for Focus Group Research, second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Hallstrom, Charlotta and Michael Reuter. 2000. Finlandssvensk ordbok. Helsinki: Schildts.
51. Halmoy, Odile. 1999. Le vouvoiement en fransais: Forme non-marquee de la seconde personne du singulier. In Jane Nystedt (ed.). XIV Skandinaviska Romanistkongressen. Stockholm: Acta Universitatis Stockhomiensis.
52. Harre, Rom and Luk van Langenhove. 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral contexts of interactional action. Oxford: Blackwell.
53. Havu, Eva. 2005. Quand les Fran$ais tutoient-ils? Paper presented at the XVIe Congres des romanistes scandinaves, 25-27 August 2005, Copenhagen. www.ruc.dk/cuid/ publikationer/publikationer/XVI-SRK-Pub/KFL/KFL06-Havu (last accessed 15 December 2007).
54. Havu, Eva. 2006. L&emploi des pronoms d&adresse en fransais: Etude sociolinguistique et comparaison avec le finnois. In Irma Taavitsainen, Juhani Harma and Jarmo Korhonen (eds.). Dialogic language use. Dimensions du dialogisme. Dialogischer Sprachgebrauch. Helsinki: Socieete Neophilologique. 225-40.
55. Hellmann, Manfred. 1978. Sprache zwischen Ost und West-Uberlegungen zur Wortschatzdifferenzierung zwischen BRD und DDR und ihren Folgen. In Wolfgang Kuhlwein und Gunter Radden (eds.). Sprache und Kultur-Studien zu Diglossie, Gastarbeiterproblematik undkulturelle Integration. Tubingen: Narr. 15-54.
56. Hellmann, Manfred. 1990. Sprachgebrauch nach der Wende: Eine erste Bestandaufnahme. Muttersprache, 100: 266-86.
57. Hickey, Leo and Miranda Stewart (eds.). 2005. Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
58. Hickey, Raymond. 2003. The German address system: Binary and scalar system at once. In Irma Raavitsainen and Andreas Jucker (eds.). Diachronic Perspectives on Address Form Systems. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 401-25.
59. Hill, Ben, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki and Tsunao Ogino. 1986. Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 10: 347-71.
60. Hofstede, Geert. 1991. Cultures and Organizations. London: McGraw-Hill.
61. Holmes, Janet. 2001. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman.
62. Holtgraves, Thomas. 2001. Politeness. In W. Peter Robinson and Howard Giles (eds.). The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 341-55.
63. Hughson, Jo-anne. 2001. Le tu et le vous: Etude sociolinguistique dans la banlieue parisienne. Unpublished Diplome d&etudes approfondies. Universite Paris-X, Nanterre.
64. Hughson, Jo-anne. 2005. Spanish address pronoun usage in an inter-cultural immigrant context: Language, social and cultural values among Spanish-English bilinguals in Australia. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of Melbourne.
65. Ide, Sachiko. 1989. Formal forms and discernment. Multilingua, 8: 223-48.
66. Joseph, John. 1989. Review of terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures by Friederike Braun. Language, 65 (4): 852-7.
67. Joseph, John. 2004. Language and Identity: National, ethnic, religious. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
68. Kachru, Braj. 1982. The Other Tongue. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
69. Kallen, Jeffrey. 2005. Politeness in Ireland: ‘…in Ireland, it&s done without being said’. In Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart (eds.). Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 130-44.
70. Kallmeyer, Werner. 2003. Sagen Sie bitte du zu mir. Werner Kallmeyer, Soziolinguist am Institut fur Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim, uber die Kunst der richtigen Anrede. Das Gesprach fuhrte Cosima Schmitt (Werner Kallmeyer, Sociolinguist at the Institute for German Language in Mannheim, on the art of correct address. Conversation with Cosima Schmitt). Die Zeit, 58.27, 26 Juni 2003.
71. Kasper, Gabriele. 1994. Politeness. In R. E. Asher (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 6. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 3206-11.
72. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1992. Les interactions verbales, vol. II. Paris: Armand Colin.
73. Kipp, Sandra, Michael Clyne and Anne Pauwels. 1995. Immigration and Australia&s Language Resources. Canberra: AGPS.
74. Kretzenbacher, Heinz L. 1991. Vom Sie zum Du-und retour? In Heinz L. Kretzenbacher and Uwe Segebrecht. Vom Sie zum Du-mehr als eine neue Konvention? Antworten aufdie Preisfrage der Deutschen Akademie fur Sprache und Dichtung vom Jahr 1989. Hamburg, Zurich: Luchterhand Literaturverlag. 9-77.
75. Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadephia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
76. Lakoff, Robin. 1973. The logic of politeness; or, minding your p&s and q&s. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society, 292-305.
77. Lakoff, Robin and Sachiko Ide (eds.). 2005. Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
78. Lambert, Wallace E. and G. Richard Tucker. 1976. Tu, Vous, Usted. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
79. Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
80. Leech, Geoffrey N. 1999. The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In Hilde Hasselgard and Signe Oksefiell (eds.). Out of Corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Rodopi. 107-118.
81. Le Page, Robert B. and Andree Tabouret-Keller. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Lerchner, Gotthard. 1992. Broiler, Plast(e) und Datsche machen noch nicht den Unterschied. Fremdheit und Toleranz in einer polyzentrischen deutschen Kommunikationskultur. In Gotthard Lerchner (ed.). Sprachkultur im Wandel: Anmerkungen zur Kommunikationskultur. Frankfurt: Lang. 297-332.
83. L&Express. 2006. D&ou viennent les Parisiens. Dossier special. L ‘Express, 30 November.
84. Linell, Per. 1998. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
85. Ludi, Georges. 1992. French as a pluricentric language. In Michael Clyne (ed.). Pluricentric Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 149-78.
86. Macarthur, Tom (ed.). 1992. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87. Maley, Catherine. 1974. The Pronouns of Address in Modern Standard French. University, MS: University of Mississippi Romance Monographs.
88. Mara, Johanna and Lena Hulden. 2000. Halsningsvanor, tilltal och omtal i Svenskfinland under 1900-talet. Kallan 2. Helsinki: Svenska litteratursallskapet i Finland.
89. Martensson, Eva. 1986. Det nya niandet. Nordlund 10. Lund: Dept. of Nordic Languages. 35-79.
90. Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1989. Politeness and conversational universal observations from Japanese. Multilingua, 8: 200-21.
91. Mattheier, Klaus J. 1980. Pragmatik und Semantik der Dialekte. Heidelberg: Winter.
92. McCarthy, Michael and Anne O&Keeffe. 2003. ‘What&s in a name?’ Vocatives in casual conversations and radio phone-in calls. In Pepi Leistyna and Charles F. Meyer (eds.). Corpus Analysis: Language structure and language use. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi. 153-85.
93. Morford, Janet. 1997. Social indexicality in French pronominal address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7 (1): 3-37.
94. Muhlhausler, Peter and Rom Harre. 1990. You: The grammatical expression of social relations. In Peter Muhlhausler and Rom Harre (eds.). Pronouns and People: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Blackwell. 131-67.
95. Muhr, Rudolf. 1987. Regionale Unterschiede im Gebrauch von Beziehungsindikatoren zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Osterreich und ihre Auswirkungen auf den Unterricht in Deutsch als Fremdsprachen, dargestellt an Modalpartikeln. In Lutz Goetze (ed.). Deutsch als Fremdsprache: Situation eines Faches. Bonn: Durrsche Buchhandlung. 144-56.
96. Muhr, Rudolf. 1994. Entschuldigen Sie, Frau Kollegin… Sprechaktrealisierungsunterschiede an Universitaten in Osterreich und Deutschland. In Susanne Bachleitner-Held (ed.). Verbale Interaktion. Salzburg: Kovac. 126-44.
97. Muhr, Rudolf and Peter Sellner. 2006. Zehn Jahre Forschung zum Osterreischischen Deutsch 1995-2005: Eine Bilanz. Frankfurt: Lang.
98. Niedzielski, Nancy A. and Dennis Richard Preston. 2000. Folk Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
99. Norrby, Catrin. 1997. Kandidat Svensson, duellerni-omutvecklingenavtilltalsskicket i svenskan. In Anders-Borje Andersson et al. (eds.). Svenska som andrasprak och andra sprak: Festskrift till Gunnar Tingbjdrn. Gothenburg: Department of Swedish Language, Gothenburg University. 319-28.
100. Norrby, Catrin and Gisela Hakansson. 2004. ‘Kan jag hjalpa dig mednagot?’ Omtilltali en servicesituation. Sprak & Stil, 13: 6-34.
101. Nyblom, Heidi. 2006. The use of address pronouns among Finnish and Finland-Swedish students. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 29 (2): 19.1-19.12
102. O Laoire, Muiris. 2005. The Language Planning Situation in Ireland. Current Issues in Language Planning, 6: 251-314.
103. Paulston, Christina Bratt. 1976. Pronouns of address in Swedish: Social class semantics and changing system. Language in Society, 5: 359-86.
104. Pauwels, Anne. 1998. Women Changing Language. London: Longman.
105. Pavlenko, Aneta and Adrian Blackledge. 2004. Introduction. Theoretical approaches to the study of negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. In Aneta Pavlenko and Adrian Blackledge (eds.). Negotiation of Identities in Multilingual Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 1-33.
106. Peeters, Bert. 2004. Tuou vous? Zeitschriftfurfranzdsische Sprache undLiteratur, 114: 1-17.
107. Peyret, Emmanuele. 2006. C&est “mademoiselle” ou “madame”? Liberation, 12 April.
108. Plevoets, Koen, Dirk Speelman and Dirk Geeraerts. 2008. The distribution of T/V pronouns in Netherlandic and Belgian Dutch. In Schneider and Barron, 181-210.
109. Ransmayr, Jutta. 2006. Der Status des Osterreichischen Deutsch an nicht-deutschsprachigen Universitaten. Frankfurt: Lang.
110. Reuter, Mikael. 1992. Swedish as a pluricentric language. In Michael Clyne (ed.). Pluricentric Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 101-16.
111. Romaine, Suzanne. 2001. A corpus-based view of gender in British and American English. In Marlis Hellinger and Hudumod Bussmann (eds.). Gender Across Languages: The linguistic representation of women and men. Vol 1. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 153-75.
112. Saari, Miijaa. 1995. ‘Jo, nu kunde vi festa nog’. Synpunkter pa svenskt sprakbruk i Sverige och Finland. Folkmalsstudier, 36: 75-108.
113. Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lecture 6. In Gail Jefferson (ed.). Lectures on Conversation. Vols. 1-2. Oxford: Blackwell. 40-8.
114. Sakowski, Klaus. Not dated. Geduzt werden im Betrieb-LAG Hamm. Juristische Beitrage Arbeitsrecht. www.sakowski.de/arb-r/arb-r13.html (accessed 24 September 2004).
115. Schacherreitner, Christian. 2004. Sie Trottel, du! ONachrichten 06/03/04. www.nachrichten. at/magazin/wochenende/252744?PHPSESSID= (accessed 24 September 2004).
116. Schlosser, Horst-Dieter. 1991. Deutsche Teilung, deutsche Einheit und die Sprache der Deutschen. Politik und Zeitgeschichte, Beilage zur Wochenzeitung Das Parlament, B17/91: 13-21.
117. Schneider, Klaus and Anne Barron (eds.). 2008. Variational Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
118. Sdun, Nora. 2004. Individuelle Kommoditat. Textem 24/08/04. www.textem.de/index.php?id=25&backPID=1&tt_news=183 (accessed 24 September 2004).
119. Seidman, Michael. 2004. The Imaginary Revolution: Parisian students and workers in 1968. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.
120. Sifianou, Maria. 1992. Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A cross-cultural perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
121. Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 1996. Reconsidering power and distance. Journal ofPragmatics, 26 (1): 1-24.
122. SproB, Elfriede Monika. 2001. Das Du-Wort. Zur Anrede im Umgang mit anderen. Unpublished PhD thesis. Karl-Franzens-Universitat, Graz.
123. Stevenson, Patrick. 2002. Language and German Disunity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
124. Stewart, Miranda. 2005. Politeness in Britain: ‘It&s only a suggestion…’. In Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart (eds.). Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 116-29.
125. Svennevig, Jan. 1999. Getting Acquainted in Conversation. A study of initial interactions. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.
126. Tajfel, Henri. 1974. Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13: 65-93.
127. Tandefelt, Marika. 1994. Urbanization and Bilingualism. In Bengt Nordberg and Norbert Dittmar (eds.). Urbanization and Language Change in Fenno-Scandinavia. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 246-73.
128. Tandefelt, Marika. 2006. Tankom.Handlingsprogram for svenskan i Finland. [Imagine if.Action plan for Swedish in Finland.] Sprak i Norden 2006. 57-66.
129. Teleman, Ulf. 2002. Ara, rikedom & reda: Svensk sprakvard och sprakpolitik under aldre nyare tid. Stockholm: Norstedts Ordbok.
130. Teleman, Ulf. 2003. Tradis och funkis: Svensk sprakvard och sprakpolitik efter 1800. Stockholm: Norstedts Ordbok.
131. Thompson, Robert W. 1992. Spanish as a pluricentric language. In Michael Clyne (1992), 45-70.
132. Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
133. Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
134. Trudgill, Peter and Jean Hannah. 1985. International English. London: Arnold.
135. Tykesson-Bergman, Ingela. 2006. Samtal i butik: Spraklig interaktion mellan bitraden och kunder. Stockholm Studies in Scandinavian Philology. New Series 41. Stockholm University.
136. Upton, Clive and John D. A. Widdowson. 2006. An Atlas of English Dialects, second edition. London, New York: Routledge.
137. Vanderkerckhove, Reinhild. 2005. Belgian Dutch versus Netherlandic Dutch: New patterns of divergence? On pronouns of address and dimunitives. Multilingua, 24: 379-98.
138. Vermaas, J. A. M. 2002. Veranderingen in de Nederlandse aanspraakvormen van de dertiende t/m de twintigste eeuw. Utrecht: LOT.
139. Wahrig, Gerhard. 1977 [1968]. Deutsches Worterbuch. Gutersloh: Bertelsmann.
140. Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
141. Wales, Katie. 2003. Second person pronouns in contemporary English: The end of a story or just the beginning? Franco-British Studies, 33-34: 172-85.
142. Wales, Katie. 2006. Northern English: A cultural and social history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
143. Watts, Richard J. 1989. Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behaviour. Multilingua, 8: 131-66.
144. Watts, Richard J. 1991. Power in Family Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
145. Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
146. Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds.). 1992. Politeness in Language: Studies in its history, theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
147. Wellander, Erik. 1935. TilltalsordetNi. Stockholm: C.E. Fritzes Bokforlags Aktiebolag.
148. Winter, Joanne and Anne Pauwels. 2007. Missing me and Msing the other: Courtesy titles for women in Englishes. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30 (1): DOI:10.2104/aral0708.
149. Yli-Vakkuri, Valma. 2005. Politeness in Finland: Evasion at all costs. In Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart (eds.). Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 189-202.
150. Zimmerman, Don. 1998. Identity, context and interaction. In Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe (eds.). Identities in Talk. London: Sage. 89-106.