Short GeLC-SWATH: A fast and reliable quantitative approach for proteomic screenings

Proteomics

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 757-762

  Anjo, Sandra Isabel ^a,b   Santa, Cátia ^a,c   Manadas, Bruno ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^d Biocant Biotechnology Innovation Center   (Portugal)

Author keywords

In gel digestion; Membrane proteins; Proteomic screenings; Quantification; SWATH; Technology

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; PROTEIN; PEPTIDE FRAGMENT; PROTEOME;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; GEL CHROMATOGRAPHY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HYDROPHOBICITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SWATH MASS SPECTROMETRY; ANIMAL; BRAIN CORTEX; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; RAT;

ANIMALS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; RATS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84922847099     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400221     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Ong, S. E., Mann, M., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005, 1, 252-262.
2. Vowinckel, J., Capuano, F., Campbell, K., Deery, M. et al., The beauty of being (label)-free: sample preparation methods for SWATH-MS and next-generation targeted proteomics. F1000 Res., doi: 10.12688/f11000research.12682-12272.v12682.
3. Gillet, L. C., Navarro, P., Tate, S., Rost, H. et al., Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2012, 11, O111.016717.
4. Switzar, L., Giera, M., Niessen, W. M., Protein digestion: an overview of the available techniques and recent developments. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 1067-1077.
5. Granvogl, B., Ploscher, M., Eichacker, L. A., Sample preparation by in-gel digestion for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Anal. Bioanal. chemistry 2007, 389, 991-1002.
6. Granvogl, B., Gruber, P., Eichacker, L. A., Standardisation of rapid in-gel digestion by mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2007, 7, 642-654.
7. Lundby, A., Olsen, J. V., GeLCMS for in-depth protein characterization and advanced analysis of proteomes. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 753, 143-155.
8. Santos, S. D., Manadas, B., Duarte, C. B., Carvalho, A. L., Proteomic analysis of an interactome for long-form AMPA receptor subunits. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 1670-1682.
9. Tang, W. H., Shilov, I. V., Seymour, S. L., Nonlinear fitting method for determining local false discovery rates from decoy database searches. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3661-3667.
10. Sennels, L., Bukowski-Wills, J. C., Rappsilber, J., Improved results in proteomics by use of local and peptide-class specific false discovery rates. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 179.
11. Lambert, J. P., Ivosev, G., Couzens, A. L., Larsen, B. et al., Mapping differential interactomes by affinity purification coupled with data-independent mass spectrometry acquisition. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 1239-1245.
12. Collins, B. C., Gillet, L. C., Rosenberger, G., Rost, H. L. et al., Quantifying protein interaction dynamics by SWATH mass spectrometry: application to the 14-3-3 system. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 1246-1253.