Hyperspectral anomaly change detection with slow feature analysis

Neurocomputing

Volumn 151, Issue P1, 2015, Pages 175-187

  Wu, Chen ^a   Zhang, Liangpei ^a   Du, Bo ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Anomaly change detection; Hyperion; Hyperspectral image; Multi temporal images; Slow feature analysis

Indexed keywords

FEATURE EXTRACTION; HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REMOTE SENSING; SPECTROSCOPY;

ANOMALY-DETECTION ALGORITHMS; CHANGE DETECTION; HYPERION; HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGE; MULTI-TEMPORAL IMAGE; SLOW FEATURE ANALYSIS; SLOW FEATURE ANALYSIS(SFA); STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS;

ANOMALY DETECTION;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; HYPERSPECTRAL ANOMALY CHANGE DETECTION METHOD; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; LEARNING ALGORITHM; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PREDICTION; REMOTE SENSING; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; SLOW FEATURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84922829753     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: 18728286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.09.058     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Singh A. Review article digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1989, 10:989-1003.
2. Lu D., Mausel P., Brondizio E., Moran E. Change detection techniques. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25:2365-2401.
3. Coppin P., Jonckheere I., Nackaerts K., Muys B., Lambin E. Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25:1565-1596.
4. Kennedy R.E., Townsend P.A., Gross J.E., Cohen W.B., Bolstad P., Wang Y.Q., Adams P. Remote sensing change detection tools for natural resource managers: understanding concepts and tradeoffs in the design of landscape monitoring projects. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113:1382-1396.
5. Hussain M., Chen D., Cheng A., Wei H., Stanley D. Change detection from remotely sensed images: from pixel-based to object-based approaches. ISPRS J. Photogramm. 2013, 80:91-106.
6. Xian G., Homer C. Updating the 2001 national land cover database impervious surface products to 2006 using landsat imagery change detection methods. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114:1676-1686.
7. Xian G., Homer C., Fry J. Updating the 2001 national land cover database land cover classification to 2006 by using landsat imagery change detection methods. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113:1133-1147.
8. Du B., Zhang L., Tao D., Zhang D. Unsupervised transfer learning for target detection from hyperspectral images. Neurocomputing 2013, 120:72-82.
9. Zhang L., Zhang L., Tao D., Huang X. Tensor discriminative locality alignment for hyperspectral image spectral-spatial feature extraction. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 2013, 51:242-256.
10. Landgrebe D. Hyperspectral image data analysis. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2002, 19:17-28.
11. Du B., Zhang L., Zhang L., Chen T., Wu K. A discriminative manifold learning based dimension reduction method. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2012, 14:272-277.
12. Moussaoui S., Hauksdóttir H., Schmidt F., Jutten C., Chanussot J., Brie D., Douté S., Benediktsson J.A. On the decomposition of Mars hyperspectral data by ICA and Bayesian positive source separation. Neurocomputing 2008, 71:2194-2208.
13. Zhang L., Wu K., Zhong Y., Li P. A new sub-pixel mapping algorithm based on a BP neural network with an observation model. Neurocomputing 2008, 71:2046-2054.
14. Zhang L., Huang X. Object-oriented subspace analysis for airborne hyperspectral remote sensing imagery. Neurocomputing 2010, 73:927-936.
15. Bioucas-Dias J., Plaza A., Camps-Valls G., Scheunders P., Nasrabadi N., Chanussot J. Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenges. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 2013, 1:6-36.
16. Wu C., Du B., Zhang L. A subspace-based change detection method for hyperspectral images. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens 2013, 6:815-830.
17. Meola J., Eismann M.T., Moses R.L., Ash J.N. Detecting changes in hyperspectral imagery using a model-based approach. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 2011, 49:2647-2661.
18. Meola J., Eismann M.T., Moses R.L., Ash J.N. Application of model-based change detection to airborne vnir/swir hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50:3693-3706.
19. Theiler J., Wohlberg B. Local coregistration adjustment for anomalous change detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50:3107-3116.
20. Eismann M.T., Meola J., Hardie R.C. Hyperspectral change detection in the presence of diurnal and seasonal variations. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 2008, 46:237-249.
21. Eismann M.T., Meola J., Stocker A.D., Beaven S.G., Schaum A.P. Airborne hyperspectral detection of small changes. Appl. Opt. 2008, 47:F27-F45.
22. Theiler J., Scovel C., Wohlberg B., Foy B.R. Elliptically contoured distributions for anomalous change detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2010, 7:271-275.
23. A. Schaum, A. Stocker, Long-interval chronochrome target detection, in: Proc. 1997 International Symposium on Spectral Sensing Research, 1998, pp. 1760-1770.
24. A.P. Schaum, A. Stocker, Hyperspectral Change Detection and Supervised Matched Filtering Based on Covariance Equalization, Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery X, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2004, pp. 77.
25. Mayer R., Bucholtz F., Scribner D. Object detection by using whitening/dewhitening to transform target signatures in multitemporal hyperspectral and multispectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 2003, 41:1136-1142.
26. Wilbert N., Sprekeler H., Franzius M., Berkes P., Wiskott L. Slow feature analysis. Scholarpedia 2011, 6:5282.
27. Wiskott L., Sejnowski T.J. Slow feature analysis: unsupervised learning of invariances. Neural Comput. 2002, 14:715-770.
28. Berkes P., Wiskott L. Slow feature analysis yields a rich repertoire of complex cell properties. J. Vision. 2005, 5:579-601.
29. Zhang Z., Dacheng T. Slow feature analysis for human action recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell 2012, 34:436-450.
30. Blaschke T., Zito T., Wiskott L. Independent slow feature analysis and nonlinear blind source separation. Neural Comput. 2007, 19:994-1021.
31. Berkes P. Pattern recognition with slow feature analysis. Cogn. Sci. EPrint Arch. (CogPrint) 2005, v4104.
32. Reed I.S., Yu X. Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 1990, 38:1760-1770.
33. Stein D.W.J., Beaven S.G., Hoff L.E., Winter E.M., Schaum A.P., Stocker A.D. Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2002, 19:58-69.
34. Jin H., Ling C.X. Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2005, 17:299-310.
35. M. Shimoni, R. Heremans, D. Borghys, C. Perneel, Change detection in industrial and urban scenes using VNIR and TIR hyperspectral imagery, in: Sixth EARSeL SIG IS Workshop, 2009.
36. Acito N., Resta S., Diani M., Corsini G. Robust technique for anomalous change detection in airborne hyperspectral imagery based on automatic and adaptive band selection. Opt. Eng. 2013, 52:36202-36208.
37. Theiler J. Quantitative comparison of quadratic covariance-based anomalous change detectors. Appl. Opt. 2008, 47:F12-F26.
38. P. Marpu, P. Gamba, J.A. Benediktsson, Hyperspectral change detection using IR-MAD and feature reduction, in: 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2011, pp. 98-101.
39. Nielsen A.A., Conradsen K., Simpson J.J. Multivariate alteration detection (MAD) and MAF postprocessing in multispectral, bitemporal image data: new approaches to change detection studies. Remote Sens. Environ. 1998, 64:1-19.
40. Nielsen A.A. The regularized iteratively reweighted MAD method for change detection in multi- and hyperspectral data. IEEE Trans. Image Process 2007, 16:463-478.
41. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Automatica 1975, 11:23-27.
42. Celik T. Unsupervised change detection in satellite images using principal component analysis and k-means clustering. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2009, 6:772-776.
43. Wang H., Ellis E.C. Image misregistration error in change measurements. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2005, 71:1037.
44. Acito N., Resta S., Diani M., Corsini G. Residual misregistration noise estimation in hyperspectral anomalous change detection. Opt. Eng. 2012, 51:111705-1-111705-10.
45. B. Wohlberg, J. Theiler, Improved Change Detection with Local Co-registration Adjustments, First Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS), 2009, 1-4.
46. B. Wohlberg, J. Theiler, Symmetrized local co-registration optimization for anomalous change detection, in: Proc. SPIE Computational Imaging VIII, (SPIE), 2010, pp. 753307.