Repetitive injection method: A tool for investigation of injection zone formation and its compression in microfluidic liquid chromatography

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 1381, Issue , 2015, Pages 110-117

  Gilar, Martin ^a   McDonald, Thomas S ^a   Roman, Gregory ^a   Johnson, Jay S ^a   Murphy, James P ^a   Jorgenson, James W ^b  

^a WATERS CORPORATION   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromatography; Gradient compression; Microfluidic; Repetitive injection method

Indexed keywords

CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; CHROMATOGRAPHY; COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY; FOCUSING; MICROFLUIDICS;

BAND FORMATIONS; GRADIENT ELUTION; INJECTION METHOD; SAMPLE INTRODUCTION; SAMPLE SOLVENT; TEMPORALLY RESOLVED; TRAILING EDGES; TRAPPING COLUMN;

LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DILUTION; ELUTION; FLOW RATE; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MICROFLUIDIC LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MICROFLUIDICS; PHASE TRANSITION; PREDICTION; REPETITIVE INJECTION METHOD; SIMULATION; VELOCITY; DEVICES; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES;

SOLVENT;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; SOLVENTS;

EID: 84922824727     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: 18733778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Rozing G., van de Goor T., Yin H., Killeen K., Glatz B., Kraiczek K., Lauer H.H. An experimental study of chromatographic dynamics in open and packed non-cylindrical conduits. J. Sep. Sci. 2004, 27:1391-1401.
2. Yin H., Killeen K. The fundamental aspects and applications of Agilent HPLC-Chip. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30:1427-1434.
3. Lin S.L., Lin T.Y., Fuh M.R. Recent developments in microfluidic chip-based separation devices coupled to MS for bioanalysis. Bioanalysis 2013, 5:2567-2580.
4. Aqai P., Cevik E., Gerssen A., Haasnoot W., Nielen M.W. High-throughput bioaffinity mass spectrometry for screening and identification of designer anabolic steroids in dietary supplements. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85:3255-3262.
5. Kruh-Garcia N.A., Murray M., Prucha J.G., Dobos K.M. Antigen 85 variation across lineages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-implications for vaccine and biomarker success. J. Proteomics 2014, 97:141-150.
6. Zhou H., Castro-Perez J., Lassman M.E., Thomas T., Li W., McLaughlin T., Dan X., Jumes P., Wagner J.A., Gutstein D.E., Hubbard B.K., Rader D.J., Millar J.S., Ginsberg H.N., Reyes-Soffer G., Cleary M., Previs S.F., Roddy T.P. Measurement of apo(a) kinetics in human subjects using a microfluidic device with tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 27:1294-1302.
7. Hebert N., Zhu X., Hunter C., van Soest R. 200μm ID chip based columns for increased throughput peptide quantitation with nanoLC/MS, US HUPO 2012 poster 2012, Eksigent.
8. Vukmanic D., Chiba M. Effect of organic solvents in sample solutions and injection volumes on chromatographic peak profiles of analytes in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1989, 483:189-196.
9. Jandera P., Hajek T., Cesla P. Effects of the gradient profile, sample volume and solvent on the separation in very fast gradients, with special attention to the second-dimension gradient in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:1995-2006.
10. Neue U.D., Marchand D.H., Snyder L.R. Peak compression in reversed-phase gradient elution. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1111:32-39.
11. Stahlberg J. The thermodynamic limit of linear gradient chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:3172-3179.
12. Poppe H., Paanakker J., Bronckhorst M. Peak width in solvent-programmed chromatography. I. General description of peak broadening in solvent-programmed elution. J. Chromatogr. 1981, 204:77-84.
13. Gritti F., Guiochon G. The ultimate band compression factor in gradient elution chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1178:79-91.
14. Neue U.D. Nonlinear retention relationships in reversed-phase chramatography. Chromatographia 2006, 63:45-53.
15. Neue U.D., Kuss H.J. Improved reversed-phase gradient retention modeling. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:3794-3803.
16. Gilar M., McDonald T.S., Johnson S.J., Murphy J.P., Jorgenson J.W. Wide injection zone compression in gradient reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr A 2015, (submitted for publication).
17. Neue U.D. Simulations of chromatograms. Quantification in LC and GC: A Practical Guide to Good Chromatographic Data 2009, 83-103. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. H.J. Kuss, S. Kromidas (Eds.).
18. Chloupek R.C., Hancock W.S., Snyder L.R. Computer simulation as a tool for the rapid optimization of the high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of a tryptic digest of human growth hormone. J. Chromatogr. 1992, 594:65-73.
19. Snyder L.R., Dolan J.W. High-Performance Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model 2007, Wiley & Son, Hoboken, NJ.
20. Snyder L.R., Dolan J.W., Gant J.R. Gradient elution in high-performance liquid chromatography. I. Theoretical basis for reversed-phase systems. J. Chromatogr. 1979, 165:3-30.
21. Dolan J.W., Snyder L.R., Djordjevic N.M., Hill D.W., Waeghe T.J. Reversed-phase liquid chromatographic separation of complex samples by optimizing temperature and gradient time I. Peak capacity limitations. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 857:1-20.
22. Dolan J.W., Gant J.R., Snyder L.R. Gradient elution in high-performance liquid chromatography: II. Practical application to reversed-phase systems. J. Chromatogr. 1979, 165:31-58.
23. Gilar M., Fountain K.J., Budman Y., Neue U.D., Yardley K.R., Rainville P.D., Russell R.J, Gebler J.C. Ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of oligonucleotides: retention prediction. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 958:167-182.
24. Schoenmakers P.J., Billiet H.A.H., De Galan L. Influence of organic modifiers on the retention behaviour in reversed-phase liquid chromatography and its consequences for gradient elution. J. Chromatogr. 1979, 185:179-195.
25. Neue U.D., Phoebe C.H., Tran K., Cheng Y.F., Lu Z. Dependence of reversed-phase retention of ionizable analytes on pH, concentration of organic solvent and silanol activity. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 925:49-67.
26. Nikitas P., Pappa-Louisi A. Retention models for isocratic and gradient elution in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:1737-1755.
27. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Peak compression factor of proteins. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:6124-6133.
28. Gilar M., Neue U.D. Peak capacity in gradient reversed-phase liquid chromatography of biopolymers. Theoretical and practical implications for the separation of oligonucleotides. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1169:139-150.
29. Snyder L.R., Dolan J.W. High performance gradient elution. The practical application of the linear-solvent-strength model 2007, John Wiley & sons, New Jersey.
30. Vu H., Spicer V., Gotfrid A., Krokhin O.V. A model for predicting slopes S in the basic equation for the linear-solvent-strength theory of peptide separation by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:489-497.
31. Masuda J., Maynard D.M., Nishimura M., Ueda T., Kowalak J.A., Markey S.P. Fully automated micro- and nanoscale one- or two-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography system for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry compatible with non-volatile salts for ion exchange chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 2005, 1063:57-69.