Wide injection zone compression in gradient reversed-phase liquid chromatography

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 1390, Issue , 2015, Pages 86-94

  Gilar, Martin ^a   McDonald, Thomas S ^a   Johnson, Jay S ^a   Murphy, James P ^a   Jorgenson, James W ^b  

^a WATERS CORPORATION   (United States)

^b The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromatography; Gradient compression; Linear solvation strength theory; Microfluidic; Repetitive injection method; Retention prediction

Indexed keywords

CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; CHROMATOGRAPHY; COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY; MICROFLUIDICS; SPREADSHEETS;

GRADIENT REVERSED-PHASE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; INJECTION METHOD; RETENTION MODELS; RETENTION PREDICTION; SEPARATION DEVICES; SMALL MOLECULES; STRENGTH THEORY; ZONE BOUNDARIES;

LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;

BIOPOLYMER; SOLVENT; OLIGOPEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; CHROMATOGRAPH; COMPRESSION; ELECTRONIC SPREADSHEET; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MICROFLUIDICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPETITIVE INJECTION METHOD; REVERSED PHASE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; SIMULATION; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; PROCEDURES;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, REVERSE-PHASE; OLIGOPEPTIDES;

EID: 84922794976     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: 18733778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.02.057     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Stevenson P.G., Bassanese D.N., Conlan X.A., Barnett N.W. Improving peak shapes with counter gradients in two-dimensional high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1337:147-154.
2. Sanchez A.C., Anspach J.A., Farkas T. Performance optimizing injection sequence for minimizing injection band broadening contributions in high efficiency liquid chromatographic separations. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1228:338-348.
3. Mills M.J., Maltas J., Lough W.J. Assessment of injection volume limits when using on-column focusing with microbore liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 759:1-11.
4. Galaon T., Bacalum E., Cheregi M., David V. Retention studies for large volume injection of aromatic solvents on phenyl-silica based stationary phase in RP-LC. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2013, 51:166-172.
5. Lim L.W., Okouchi Y., Takeuchi T. On-line preconcentration of trace carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in microcolumn liquid chromatography via large volume injection. Talanta 2007, 72:1600-1608.
6. Jandera P., Hajek T., Cesla P. Effects of the gradient profile, sample volume and solvent on the separation in very fast gradients, with special attention to the second-dimension gradient in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:1995-2006.
7. Gilar M., McDonald T.S., Roman G., Johnson J.S., Murphy J.P., Jorgenson J.W. Repetitive injection method: a tool for investigation of injection zone formation and its compression in microfluidic liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1381:110-117.
8. Snyder L.R., Saunders D.L. Optimized solvent programming for separations of complex samples by liquid-solid adsorption chromatography. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1969, 7:195-208.
9. Lin S.L., Lin T.Y., Fuh M.R. Recent developments in microfluidic chip-based separation devices coupled to MS for bioanalysis. Bioanalysis 2013, 5:2567-2580.
10. Zhou H., Castro-Perez J., Lassman M.E., Thomas T., Li W., McLaughlin T., Dan X., Jumes P., Wagner J.A., Gutstein D.E., Hubbard B.K., Rader D.J., Millar J.S., Ginsberg H.N., Reyes-Soffer G., Cleary M., Previs S.F., Roddy T.P. Measurement of apo(a) kinetics in human subjects using a microfluidic device with tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 27:1294-1302.
11. Rozing G., van de Goor T., Yin H., Killeen K., Glatz B., Kraiczek K., Lauer H.H. An experimental study of chromatographic dynamics in open and packed non-cylindrical conduits. J. Sep. Sci. 2004, 27:1391-1401.
12. Aqai P., Cevik E., Gerssen A., Haasnoot W., Nielen M.W. High-throughput bioaffinity mass spectrometry for screening and identification of designer anabolic steroids in dietary supplements. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85:3255-3262.
13. Yin H., Killeen K. The fundamental aspects and applications of Agilent HPLC-Chip. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30:1427-1434.
14. N. Hebert, X. Zhu, C. Hunter, R. van Soest, 200μm ID chip based columns for increased throughput peptide quantitation with nanoLC/MS, US HUPO 2012 poster, Eksigent (2012).
15. Kruh-Garcia N.A., Murray M., Prucha J.G., Dobos K.M. Antigen 85 variation across lineages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-implications for vaccine and biomarker success. J. Proteomics 2014, 97:141-150.
16. Poppe H., Paanakker J., Bronckhorst M. Peak width in solvent-programmed chromatography. I. General description of peak broadening in solvent-programmed elution. J. Chromatogr. 1981, 204:77-84.
17. Neue U.D., Marchand D.H., Snyder L.R. Peak compression in reversed-phase gradient elution. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1111:32-39.
18. Gritti F., Guiochon G. The ultimate band compression factor in gradient elution chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1178:79-91.
19. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Peak compression factor of proteins. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:6124-6133.
20. Snyder L.R., Dolan J.W. High Performance Gradient Elution. The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model 2007, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
21. Snyder L.R., Dolan J.W., Gant J.R. Gradient elution in high-performance liquid chromatography. I. Theoretical basis for reversed-phase systems. J. Chromatogr. 1979, 165:3-30.
22. Neue U.D., Kuss H.J. Improved reversed-phase gradient retention modeling. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:3794-3803.
23. Gilar M., Fountain K.J., Budman Y., Neue U.D., Yardley K.R., Rainville P.D., Russell R.J., Gebler J.C. Ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of oligonucleotides: retention prediction. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 958:167-182.
24. Schoenmakers P.J., Billiet H.A.H., De Galan L. Influence of organic modifiers on the retention behaviour in reversed-phase liquid chromatography and its consequences for gradient elution. J. Chromatogr. 1979, 185:179-195.
25. Neue U.D., Phoebe C.H., Tran K., Cheng Y.F., Lu Z. Dependence of reversed-phase retention of ionizable analytes on pH, concentration of organic solvent and silanol activity. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 925:49-67.
26. Neue U.D. Nonlinear retention relationships in reversed-phase chramatography. Chromatographia 2006, 63:45-53.
27. Gilar M., Xie H., Jaworski A. Utility of retention prediction model for investigation of peptide separation selectivity in reversed-phase liquid chromatography: impact of concentration of trifluoroacetic acid, column temperature, gradient slope and type of stationary phase. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82:265-275.
28. Gilar M., Neue U.D. Peak capacity in gradient reversed-phase liquid chromatography of biopolymers. Theoretical and practical implications for the separation of oligonucleotides. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1169:139-150.
29. Vu H., Spicer V., Gotfrid A., Krokhin O.V. A model for predicting slopes S in the basic equation for the linear-solvent-strength theory of peptide separation by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:489-497.
30. Nikitas P., Pappa-Louisi A. Retention models for isocratic and gradient elution in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:1737-1755.