Costs and benefits of automatization in category learning of ill-defined rules

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 69, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-24

  Raijmakers, Maartje E J ^a   Schmittmann, Verena D ^b   Visser, Ingmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Automaticity; Category learning; Exemplar based learning; Ill defined categories; Individual differences; Latent Markov analysis; Representational shifts; Rule based learning; Strategies

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT FORMATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

CONCEPT FORMATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 84891948030     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Anderson J.R. The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review 1991, 98:409-429.
2. Anderson J.R., Betz J. A hybrid model of categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8(4):629-647.
3. Ashby F.G., Crossley M.J. Interactions between declarative and procedural-learning categorization systems. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 2010, 94(1):1-12.
4. Ashby F.G., Ell S.W. The neurobiology of human category learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5(5):204-210.
5. Ashby F.G., Gott R.E. Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988, 14(1):33-53.
6. Ashby F.G., Alfonso-Reese L.A., Turken A.U., Waldron E.M. A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review 1998, 105(3):442-481.
7. Ashby F.G., Ennis J.M., Spiering B.J. A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorization. Psychological Review 2007, 114(3):632-656.
8. Ashby F.G., Maddox W.T. Human category learning 2.0. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2010, 1-15.
9. Ashby F.G., Queller S., Berretty P.M. On the dominance of unidimensional rules in unsupervised categorization. Perception & Psychophysics 1999, 61:1178-1199.
10. Azzelini A. Statistical inference based on the likelihood 1996, Chapman and Hall, London.
11. Boom J., Hoijtink H., Kunnen S. Rules in the balance: Classes, strategies, or rules for the balance scale task?. Cognitive Development 2001, 16:717-735.
12. Bourne L.E., Healy A.F., Kole J.A., Graham S.M. Strategy shifts in classification skill acquisition: Does memory retrieval dominate rule use?. Memory & Cognition 2006, 34:903-913.
13. Bruner J.S., Goodnow J.J., Austin G.A. A study of thinking 1956, John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York.
14. Clogg C.C. Latent class models. Handbook of statistical modeling in the behavioral and social sciences 1994, Plenum, New York. G. Arminger (Ed.).
15. Davis T., Love B.C., Preston A.R. Learning the exception to the rule: Model-based fMRI reveals specialized representations for surprising category members. Cerebral Cortex 2012, 22:260-273.
16. Erickson M.A., Kruschke J.K. Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1998, 127(2):107-140.
17. Gluck M.A., Bower G.H. From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1988, 117:227-247.
18. Goldstone R.L., Kersten A. Concepts and categorization. Comprehensive handbook of psychology. Experimental psychology 2003, Vol. 4. Wiley, New Jersey.
19. Heinen T. Latent class and discrete latent trait models: Similarities and differences 1996, Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA.
20. Hélie S., Waldschmidt J.G., Ashby F.G. Automaticity in rule-based and information-integration categorization. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2010, 72(4):1013-1031.
21. Jansen B.R.J., van der Maas H.L.J. Statistical test of the rule assessment methodology by latent class analysis. Developmental Review 1997, 17(3):321-357.
22. Jansen B.R.J., van der Maas H.L.J. The development of children's rule use on the balance scale task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2002, 81(4):383-416.
23. Johansen M.K., Palmeri T.J. Are there representational shifts during category learning?. Cognitive Psychology 2002, 45(4):482-553.
24. Kruschke J.K. ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review 1992, 99(1):22-44.
25. Langeheine R., Van de Pol F. A unifying framework for Markov modeling in discrete space and discrete time. Sociological Methods & Researc 1990, 18(4):416-441.
26. Logan G.D. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review 1988, 95(4):492-527.
27. Love B.C., Medin D.L., Gureckis T.M. SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review 2004, 111(2):309-332.
28. Maddox W.T., Ing A.D. Delayed feedback disrupts the procedural-learning system but not the hypothesis-testing system in perceptual category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31(1):100-107.
29. Matsuka T., Sakamoto Y., Chouchourelou A. Modeling a flexible representation machinery of human concept learning. Neural Networks 2008, 21:289-302.
30. McCutcheon A.L. Latent class analysis 1987, Sage, Newbury Park.
31. Medin D.L., Schaffer M.M. Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review 1978, 85(3):207-238.
32. Moors A., De Houwer J. Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2006, 132(2):297-326.
33. Nomura E.M., Maddox W.T., Filoteo J.V., Ing A.D., Gitelman D.R., Parrish T.B., et al. Neural correlates of rule-based and information-integration visual category learning. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:37-43.
34. Nosofsky R.M. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1986, 115(1):39-57.
35. Nosofsky R.M. Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988, 14:700-708.
36. Nosofsky R.M., Palmeri T.J. An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review 1997, 104(2):266-300.
37. Nosofsky R.M., Palmeri T.J. A rule-plus-exception model for classifying objects in continuous-dimension spaces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1998, 5(3):345-369.
38. Nosofsky R.M., Clark S.E., Shin H.J. Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15(2):282-304.
39. Nosofsky R.M., Palmeri T.J., McKinley S.C. Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review 1994, 101(1):53-79.
40. Palmeri T.J., Gauthier I. Visual object understanding. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5:291-303.
41. Palmeri T.J., Wong A.C., Gauthier I. Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:378-386.
42. Posner M.I., Keele S.W. On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968, 77:353-363.
43. Quinlan P.T., van der Maas H.L.J., Jansen B.R.J., Booij O., Rendell M. Re-thinking stages of cognitive development: An appraisal of connectionist models of the balance scale task. Cognition 2007, 103:413-459.
44. Rabiner L.R. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 1989, 77(2):267-295.
45. Raijmakers M.E.J., Dolan C.V., Molenaar P.C.M. Finite mixture distribution models of simple discrimination learning. Memory & Cognition 2001, 29(5):659-677.
46. Raijmakers M.E.J., Jansen B.R.J., van der Maas H.L.J. Rules and development in triad classification task performance. Developmental Review 2004, 24(3):289-321.
47. Raijmakers M.E.J., Van Koten S., Molenaar P.C.M. On the validity of simulating stagewise development by means of PDP networks: Application of catastrophe analysis and an experimental test of rule-like behavior. Cognitive Science 1996, 20:101-136.
48. Rickard T.C. Strategy execution in cognitive skill learning: An item-level test of candidate models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30(1):65-82.
49. Rindskopf D. Using latent class analysis to test developmental models. Developmental Review 1987, 7(1):66-85.
50. Rosch E., Mervis C.B. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 1975, 7:573-605.
51. Schmittmann V.D., Dolan C.V., van der Maas H.L.J., Neale M.C. Discrete latent Markov models for normally distributed response data. Structural Equation Modeling 2005, 12(1):94-119.
52. Schmittmann V.D., Visser I., Raijmakers M.E.J. Multiple learning modes in the development of performance on a rule-based category-learning task. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(11):2079-2091.
53. Schneider W., Chein J.M. Controlled and automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science 2003, 27:525-559.
54. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 1978, 6:461-464.
55. Shiffrin R.M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 1977, 84:127-190.
56. Straatemeier M., van der Maas H.L.J., Jansen B.R.J. Children's knowledge of the earth: A new methodological and statistical approach. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2008, 100(4):276-296.
57. Touron D.R., Hertzog C. Strategy shift affordance and strategy choice in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32(2):298-310.
58. van Bers B.M.C.W., Visser I., van Schijndel T.J.P., Mandell D.J., Raijmakers M.E.J. The dynamics of development on the dimensional change card sorting task. Developmental Science 2011, 14:960-971.
59. van der Maas H.L.J., Straatemeier M. How to detect cognitive strategies: Commentary on 'Differentiation and integration: Guiding principles for analyzing cognitive change'. Developmental Science 2008, 11(4):449-453.
60. Vandierendonck A. A parallel rule activation and rule synthesis model for generalization in category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1995, 2(4):442-459.
61. Visser I., Speekenbrink M. depmixS4: An R-package for hidden Markov models. Journal of Statistical Software 2010, 36(7):1-21. (Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i07. Current version of depmixS4 available from CRAN, http://cran.r-project.org).
62. Visser I., Raijmakers M.E.J., Molenaar P.C.M. Fitting hidden Markov models to psychological data. Scientific Programming 2002, 10(3):185-200.
63. Visser I., Raijmakers M.E.J., Molenaar P.C.M. Characterizing sequence knowledge using online measures and hidden Markov models. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35(6):1502-1517.
64. Visser I., Schmittmann V.D., Raijmakers M.E.J. Markov process models for discrimination learning. Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences 2007, 337-366. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. K. van Montfort, H. Oud, A. Satorra (Eds.).
65. Visser, I., Schmittmann, V. D., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (in preparation). Category learning of an ill-defined category in school-aged children compared to adults.
66. Visser I. Seven things to remember about hidden Markov models. A tutorial on Markovian models for time series. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2011, 55(6):403-415.
67. Wickens T.D. Models for behavior: Stochastic processes in psychology 1982, San Francisco, Freeman, CA.