Tissue integration of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: A comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 82, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1453-1461

  Thoma, Daniel S ^a   Jones, Archie A ^b   Dard, Michel ^c   Grize, Leticia ^d   Obrecht, Marcel ^c   Cochran, David L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^c INSTITUT STRAUMANN AG   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Animal; Dental implants; Histology; Models; Radiography; Titanium; Zirconium

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOG; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; RANDOMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANIMALS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DOGS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 80053607887     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.100737     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Longterm evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172. (Pubitemid 127688451)
2. Pikner SS, Gröndahl K, Jemt T, Friberg B. Marginal bone loss at implants: A retrospective, long-term follow-up of turned Brånemark System implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:11-23.
3. Zinsli B, Sägesser T, Mericske E, Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of small-diameter ITI implants: A prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:92-99. (Pubitemid 38251151)
4. Romeo E, Lops D, Margutti E, Ghisolfi M, Chiapasco M, Vogel G. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: A 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:247-259. (Pubitemid 38561063)
5. Allum SR, Tomlinson RA, Joshi R. The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: A comparative laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:553-559.
6. Davidson JA, Mishra AK, Kovacs P, Poggie RA. New surface-hardened, low-modulus, corrosion-resistant Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloy for total hip arthroplasty. Biomed Mater Eng 1994;4:231-243.
7. Davidson JA, Daigle KP, Kovacs P. Wear-resistant, hemocompatible Ti-Nb-Zr and Zr-Nb alloys to improve blood pump design and performance. Artif Organs 1996;20:513-522. (Pubitemid 26246655)
8. Goodman SB, Davidson JA, Fornasier VL. Histological reaction to titanium alloy and hydroxyapatite particles in the rabbit tibia. Biomaterials 1993;14:723-728. (Pubitemid 23247497)
9. Khan MA, Williams RL, Williams DF. Conjoint corrosion and wear in titanium alloys. Biomaterials 1999; 20:765-772. (Pubitemid 29176705)
10. Khan MA, Williams RL, Williams DF. The corrosion behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V, Ti-6Al-7Nb and Ti-13Nb-13Zr in protein solutions. Biomaterials 1999;20:631-637. (Pubitemid 29126733)
11. Okazaki Y, Rao S, Ito Y, Tateishi T. Corrosion resistance, mechanical properties, corrosion fatigue strength and cytocompatibility of new Ti alloys without Al and V. Biomaterials 1998;19:1197-1215. (Pubitemid 28395142)
12. Albrektsson T, Hansson HA, Ivarsson B. Interface analysis of titanium and zirconium bone implants. Biomaterials 1985;6:97-101. (Pubitemid 15104541)
13. Schätzle M, Männchen R, Balbach U, Hämmerle CH, Toutenburg H, Jung RE. Stability change of chemically modified sandblasted/acid-etched titanium palatal implants. A randomized-controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:489-495.
14. Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, et al. Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: A randomized pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:755-760.
15. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-533. (Pubitemid 41766080)
16. Bornstein MM, Valderrama P, Jones AA, Wilson TG, Seibl R, Cochran DL. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: A histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:233-241.
17. Gottlow J, Dard M, Kjellson F, Obrecht M, Sennerby L. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: A biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig [published online ahead of print June 25, 2010]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. doi:10.1111/j. 1708-8208.2010.00289.
18. Schenk R, Olah AJ, Hermann W. Preparation of calcified tissues for light microscopy. In: Dickson GR, ed. Methods of Calcified Tissue preparation. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1984:1.56.
19. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Säge-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:318-326. (Pubitemid 12092572)
20. Exner HE. A model stereological nomenclature. Acta Stereologica 1987;6(Suppl. 2):179-184.
21. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:1117-1130. (Pubitemid 127513679)
22. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2000;71:1412-1424.
23. Jung RE, Jones AA, Higginbottom FL, et al. The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs. J Periodontol 2008;79:260-270.
24. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:9-17. (Pubitemid 43188233)
25. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
26. Cochran DL, Bosshardt DD, Grize L, et al. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant- abutment diameters in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2009;80:609-617.
27. Morton D, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, et al. Early loading after 21 days of healing of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: Two-year results of a prospective two-center study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:9-17.
28. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lindhe J. Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32:925-932. (Pubitemid 41175584)
29. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2003;82:232-237. (Pubitemid 41766049)
30. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Periimplant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2006;85:473-478. (Pubitemid 43799268)