Framing effects and rationality

The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Sher, Shlomi ^a   McKenzie, Craig R M ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Framing effects; Natural language; Rationality; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922760774     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216093.003.0004     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Allan, L. G. (1993). Human contingency judgments: rule based or associative? Psychological Bulletin, 114, 325-448.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of tought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Duchon, D., Dunegan, K. J., & Barton, S. L. (1989). Framing the problem and making decisions: the facts are not enough. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, February, 25-27.
4. Hilton, D. J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: conversational inference and rational judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 248-271.
5. Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 1338-1339.
6. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Shafir, E. (1993). The interaction between reasoning and decision making: an introduction. Cognition, 49, 2, 1-9.
7. Jou, J., Shanteau, J., & Harris, R. J. (1996). An information processing view of framing effects: the role of causal schemas in decision making. Memory & Cognition, 24, 1-15.
8. Kahneman, D. (2000). Preface. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
10. Klayman, J. (1995). Varieties of confirmation bias. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 32, 385-418.
11. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228.
12. Kühberger, A. (1995). The framing of decisions: a new look at old problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 230-240.
13. Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23-55.
14. Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 374-378.
15. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188.
16. Marteau, T. M. (1989). Framing of information: its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 89-94.
17. McKenzie, C. R. M. (1994). The accuracy of intuitive judgment strategies: Covariation assessment and Bayesian inference. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 209-239.
18. McKenzie, C. R. M. (2004a). Framing effects in inference tasks-and why they are normatively defensible. Memory & Cognition, 32, 874-885.
19. McKenzie, C. R. M. (2004b). Hypothesis testing and evaluation. In D. J. Koehler, & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 200-219). Oxford: Blackwell.
20. McKenzie, C. R. M., & Amin, M. B. (2002). When wrong predictions provide more support than right ones. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 821-828.
21. McKenzie, C. R. M., Ferreira, V. S., Mikkelsen, L. A., McDermott, K. J., & Skrable, R. P. (2001). Do conditional hypotheses target rare events? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 291-309.
22. McKenzie, C. R. M., Liersch, M. J., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2006). Recommendations implicit in policy defaults. Psychological Science, 17, 414-420.
23. McKenzie, C. R. M., & Mikkelsen, L. A. (2000). The psychological side of Hempel's paradox of confirmation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 360-366.
24. McKenzie, C. R. M., & Mikkelsen, L. A. (2007). A Bayesian view of covariation assessment. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 33-61.
25. McKenzie, C. R. M., & Nelson, J. D. (2003). What a speaker's choice of frame reveals: reference points, frame selection, and framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 596-602.
26. McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., Jr., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259-1262.
27. Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast selfexamination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500-510.
28. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220.
29. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608-631.
30. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2003). Optimal data selection: revision, review, and reevaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 289-319.
31. Rensink, R.A., O'Regan, J. K., and Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
32. Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Shafir, E., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2002). Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 491-517.
34. Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2006). Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition, 101, 467-494.
35. Treisman, A. & DeSchepper, B. (1996). Object tokens, attention, and visual memory. In T. Inui, & J. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: information integration in perception and communication (pp. 15-46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
37. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, S251-S278.
38. Wilson, D. K., Kaplan, R. M., & Schneidermann, L. J. (1987). Framing of decisions and selections of alternatives in health care. Social Behaviour, 2, 51-59.