Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed From Something Blue: Experiments on Dual Viewing TV and Twitter

Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 400-419

  Cameron, Jaclyn ^a   Geidner, Nick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922705042     PISSN: 08838151     EISSN: 15506878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2014.935852     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Eds.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177–190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie.
2. Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.
3. Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2008). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication, 58, 508–529.
4. Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111–137.
5. Crutchfield, R. S. (1955). Conformity and character. American Psychologist, 10, 191–198.
6. Davis, C. J., Bowers, J. S., & Memon, A. (2011). Social influence in televised election debates: A potential distortion of democracy. PLoS ONE, 6, e18154.
7. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.
8. Elmer, G. (2012). Live research: Twittering an election debate. New Media & Society. 1–13. doi: 10.1177/1461444812457328
9. Fein, S., Goethals, G. R., & Kugler, M. B. (2007). Social influences on political judgments: The case of presidential debates. Political Psychology, 28, 165–192.
10. Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). Acquiescence and social desirability as item response determinants: An IRT-based study with the Marlowe-Crowne and the EQ Lie scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 596–600.
11. Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 265–285.
12. Garrett, R. K., Carnahan, D., & Lynch, E. K. (2011). A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004–2008. Political Behavior, 35, 113–134.
13. Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247–266.
14. Guiffre, L. (2012, September). Coming of the second screen. Metro Magazine, 173, 142.
15. Hayes, A. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Jackson, D. N., & Messick, S. (1958). Content and style in personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 243–252.
17. Kassin, S. M. (1979). Consensus information, prediction, and causal attribution: A review of the literature and issues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1966–1981.
18. Kelly, S. M. (2013, March 12). The Bachelor gets social with real-time tweets on TV. Mashable. Retrieved from http://mashable.com.
19. Kim, J., & Park, H. S. (2011). The effect of uniform virtual appearance on conformity intention: Social identity model of deindividuation effects and optimal distinctiveness theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1223–1230.
20. Konolojy, A. (2013, July 17). Project Runway to reveal biggest second-screen interactivity in its history for launch of season 12. TV by the Numbers: Zap2it. Retrieved from http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com.
21. Larsson, A. O. (2013). Tweeting the viewer—use of twitter in a talk show context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 135–152.
22. Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2011). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 14, 729–747.
23. Lau, A. (2013, April 10). China's social media landscape 2013—CIC CEO on Social TV, WeChat, and More. ClickZ. Retrieved from http://www.clickz.com.
24. Lee, E. J. (2008). When are strong arguments stronger than weak arguments? Deindividuation effects on message elaboration in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 35, 646–665.
25. MECinAction. (2013, March, 28). The re-socialization of TV [Web log video]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rm2gPgGNx1k.
26. Nabi, R. L., Stitt, C. R., Halford, J., & Finnerty, K. L. (2006). Emotional and cognitive predictors of the enjoyment of reality-based and fictional television programming: An elaboration of the uses and gratifications perspective. Media Psychology, 8, 421–447.
27. Nakaso, D. (2013, September 30). Facebook, Twitter to send report on television-related “likes,” tweets to TV networks. San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved from http://www.mercurynews.com.
28. Nielsen. (2012). Nielsen's state of the media: Advertising & audiences (part 2: by demographic). Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2012/report-u-s-media-trends-by-demographic.html.
29. Nielsen. (2013, October 7). Nielsen launches “Nielsen Twitter TV ratings” [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/press-room/2013/nielsen-launches-nielsen-twitter-tv-ratings.html.
30. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—our social skin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. Ostrow, J. (2012, December 12). Ostrow: Hashtags on TV frustrate viewers but find favor as a marketing tool. The Denver Post. Retrieved from http://www.denverpost.com.
32. Paul, B., Salwen, M. B., & Dupagne, M. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 57–85.
33. Schlosser, A. E. (2009). The effect of computer-mediated communication on conformity vs. nonconformity: An impression management perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 374–388.
34. Sharp, A. (2012, October 17). Twitter at the town hall debate [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://blog.twitter.com/2012/twitter-at-the-town-hall-debate.
35. Smith, A., & Boyles, J. L. (2012). The rise of the “connected viewer.” (Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project). Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Connected_Viewers.pdf.
36. Smith, A., & Duggan, M. (2012). The state of the 2012 election—mobile politics. (Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project Report). Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_State_of_the_2012_race_mobile.pdf.
37. Song, G., Ma, Q., Wu, F., & Li, L. (2012). The psychological explanation of conformity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40, 1365–1372.
38. Stross, R. (2012, March 4). The second screen, trying to complement the first. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/.
39. Tagle, J. (2013). Social conversations on TV made possible by DISH with new Hopper app [Press release]. Retrieved from http://about.dish.com/press-release/products-and-services/social-conversations-tv-made-possible-dish-new-hopper-app.
40. Thorson, E., Wicks, R., & Leshner, G. (2012). Experimental methodology in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 112–124.
41. Tribbey, C. (2014, January 14). CEA, NATPE study offers second screen viewing insights [Web log post]. 2ndScreenSociety.com. Retreived from http://www.2ndscreensociety.com/blog/2014/01/14/cea-natpe-study-offers-second-screen-viewing-insights/.
42. Twitter. (2011, May 4). Watching together: Twitter and TV [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://blog.twitter.com/2011/watching-together-twitter-and-tv.
43. Twitter. (2012). 2012 year on Twitter: Global town square [Blog]. Retrieved from https://2012.twitter.com/en/global-town-square.html.
44. Visser, P. S., & Mirabile, R. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 779–795.
45. Weaver, J. B., Huck, I., & Brosius, H. B. (2009). Biasing public opinion: Computerized continuous response measurement displays impact viewers' perceptions of media messages. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 50–55.
46. Zhang, W., & Chia, S. C. (2006). The effects of mass media use and social capital on civic and political participation. Communication Studies, 57, 277–297.
47. Zickuhr, K. (2010). Generation 2010. (Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project Report). Retrieved from: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Generations-2010.aspx.