A Meta-Analysis of Pulmonary Function With Pulsatile Perfusion in Cardiac Surgery

Artificial Organs

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 110-117

  Lim, Choon Hak ^a   Nam, Myung Ji ^b   Lee, Ji Sung ^c   Kim, Hyun Jung ^b   Kim, Ji Yeon ^d   Shin, Hye Won ^a   Lee, Hye Won ^a   Sun, Kyung ^a  

^a Korea University Ansan Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Soonchunhyang University   (South Korea)

^d Inje University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary bypass; Meta analysis; Pulsatile perfusion

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY;

CARDIAC-SURGERY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CHEST RADIOGRAPHS; CONTROLLED TRIAL; META-ANALYSIS; NON-INVASIVE VENTILATIONS; PULMONARY DYSFUNCTION; PULMONARY FUNCTION; PULSATILES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

INTENSIVE CARE UNITS;

ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE; ARTICLE; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG COMPLIANCE; LUNG FUNCTION; LUNG PERFUSION; META ANALYSIS; NONINVASIVE POSITIVE VENTILATION; NONINVASIVE VENTILATION; NONPULSATILE PERFUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; PULSATILE PERFUSION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; LUNG; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERFUSION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; HUMANS; LUNG; PERFUSION; PULSATILE FLOW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84922638758     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aor.12312     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Messent M, Sullivan K, Keogh BF, Morgan CJ, Evans TW. Adult respiratory distress syndrome following cardiopulmonary bypass: incidence and prediction. Anaesthesia 1992;47:267-268.
2. Asimakopoulos G, Smith PL, Ratnatunga CP, Taylor KM. Lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome after cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1107-1115.
3. Ng CS, Wan S, Yim AP, Arifi AA. Pulmonary dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Chest 2002;121:1269-1277.
4. Richter JA, Meisner H, Tassani P, Barankay A, Dietrich W, Braun SL. Drew-Anderson technique attenuates systemic inflammatory response syndrome and improves respiratory function after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:77-83.
5. Siepe M, Goebel U, Mecklenburg A, etal. Pulsatile pulmonary perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass reduces the pulmonary inflammatory response. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:115-122.
6. Haines N, Wang S, Undar A, Alkan T, Akcevin A. Clinical outcomes of pulsatile and non-pulsatile mode of perfusion. J Extra Corpor Technol 2009;41:26-29.
7. Santini F, Onorati F, Telesca M, etal. Pulsatile pulmonary perfusion with oxygenated blood ameliorates pulmonary hemodynamic and respiratory indices in low-risk coronary artery bypass patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:794-803.
8. Baraki H, Gohrbandt B, Del Bagno B, Haverich A, Boethig D, Kutschka I. Does pulsatile perfusion improve outcome after cardiac surgery? A propensity-matched analysis of 1959 patients. Perfusion 2012;27:166-174.
9. Onorati F, Santarpino G, Presta P, etal. Pulsatile perfusion with intra-aortic balloon pumping ameliorates whole body response to cardiopulmonary bypass in the elderly. Crit Care Med 2009;37:902-911.
10. Abramov D, Tamariz M, Serrick CI, etal. The influence of cardiopulmonary bypass flow characteristics on the clinical outcome of 1820 coronary bypass patients. Can J Cardiol 2003;19:237-243.
11. Murray JF, Matthay MA, Luce JM, Flick MR. An expanded definition of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;138:720-723.
12. Lim CH, Son HS, Fang YH, etal. Hemodynamic energy generated by a combined centrifugal pump with an intra-aortic balloon pump. ASAIO J 2006;52:592-594.
13. Gu YJ, van Oeveren W, Mungroop HE, etal. Clinical effectiveness of centrifugal pump to produce pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Artif Organs 2011;35:E18-26.
14. Serraino GF, Marsico R, Musolino G, etal. Pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass with intra-aortic balloon pump improves organ function and reduces endothelial activation. Circ J 2012;76:1121-1129.
15. Onorati F, Rubino AS, Nucera S, etal. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery versus standard linear or pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass: endothelial activation and inflammatory response. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37:897-904.
16. Onorati F, Santarpino G, Rubino AS, etal. Body perfusion during adult cardiopulmonary bypass is improved by pulsatile flow with intra-aortic balloon pump. Int J Artif Organs 2009;32:50-61.
17. Sezai A, Shiono M, Nakata K, etal. Effects of pulsatile CPB on interleukin-8 and endothelin-1 levels. Artif Organs 2005;29:708-713.
18. Tarcan O, Ozatik MA, Kale A, etal. Comparison of pulsatile and non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Sci Monit 2004;10:CR294-299.
19. Driessen JJ, Dhaese H, Fransen G, etal. Pulsatile compared with nonpulsatile perfusion using a centrifugal pump for cardiopulmonary bypass during coronary artery bypass grafting. Effects on systemic haemodynamics, oxygenation, and inflammatory response parameters. Perfusion 1995;10:3-12.
20. Murkin JM, Martzke JS, Buchan AM, Bentley C, Wong CJ. A randomized study of the influence of perfusion technique and pH management strategy in 316 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. I. Mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:340-348.
21. Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ 1997;315:1533-1537.
22. Bevelaqua F, Garritan S, Haas F, Salazar-Schicchi J, Axen K, Reggiani JL. Complications after cardiac operations in patients with severe pulmonary impairment. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:602-606.
23. Alkan-Bozkaya T, Akçevin A, Türkoğlu H, Ündar A. Impact of pulsatile perfusion on clinical outcomes of neonates and infants with complex pathologies undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass procedures. Artif Organs 2013;37:82-86.
24. Alkan T, Akçevin A, Undar A, Türkoğlu H, Paker T, Aytaç A. Effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion on vital organ recovery in pediatric heart surgery: a pilot clinical study. ASAIO J 2006;52:530-535.
25. Zhao J, Liu JP, Feng ZY, Liu YL, Li SJ, Long C. Clinical application of pulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass in pediatric heart surgery. ASAIO J 2009;55:300-303.
26. Alkan T, Akçevin A, Undar A, Türkoğlu H, Paker T, Aytaç A. Benefits of pulsatile perfusion on vital organ recovery during and after pediatric open heart surgery. ASAIO J 2007;53:651-654.
27. Akçevin A, Alkan-Bozkaya T, Qiu F, Undar A. Evaluation of perfusion modes on vital organ recovery and thyroid hormone homeostasis in pediatric patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Artif Organs 2010;34:879-884.
28. Undar A, Eichstaedt HC, Masai T, Bigley JE, Kunselman AR. Precise quantification of pulsatility is a necessity for direct comparisons of six different pediatric heart-lung machines in a neonatal CPB model. ASAIO J 2005;51:600-603.
29. Undar A. Controversy over the benefits of pulsatile perfusion. Int J Artif Organs 2004;27:509-510.
30. Shepard RB, Simpson DC, Sharp JF. Energy equivalent pressure. Arch Surg 1966;93:730-740.
31. Wright G. Hemodynamic analysis could resolve the pulsatile blood flow controversy. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:1199-1204.
32. Ündar A. Energy equivalent pressure formula is for precise quantification of different perfusion modes. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1777-1778.
33. Undar A, Ji B, Lukic B, etal. Quantification of perfusion modes in terms of surplus hemodynamic energy levels in a simulated pediatric CPB model. ASAIO J 2006;52:712-717.