|
Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 509-512
|
Controversy over the benefits of pulsatile perfusion (multiple letters) [1]
a b,c,d b,c,d b,c,d b,c,d b,c,d b,c,d b,c,d b,c,d b,c,d b,c,d
d
Bitsnbrains
(Spain)
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTERIAL PRESSURE;
CANNULA;
CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS;
CARDIOPULMONARY HEMODYNAMICS;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION;
HEART ASSIST DEVICE;
HEART PERFUSION;
HUMAN;
LETTER;
LUNG PERFUSION;
OXYGENATOR;
PULSATILE FLOW;
THROMBOCYTE FUNCTION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
WAVEFORM;
ANIMAL;
BLOOD PRESSURE;
CENTRIFUGATION;
HEMODYNAMICS;
NOTE;
PHYSIOLOGY;
SWINE;
THROMBOCYTE ACTIVATION;
THROMBOCYTE COUNT;
ANIMALS;
BLOOD PRESSURE;
CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS;
CENTRIFUGATION;
EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION;
HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES;
PLATELET ACTIVATION;
PLATELET COUNT;
PULSATILE FLOW;
SWINE;
|
EID: 4644291302
PISSN: 03913988
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/039139880402700610 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (0)
|