Precise quantification of pulsatility is a necessity for direct comparisons of six different pediatric heart-lung machines in a neonatal CPB model

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 600-603

  Ündar, Akif ^a,c   Eichstaedt, Harald C ^b   Masai, Takafumi ^b   Bigley, Joyce E ^b   Kunselman, Allen R ^c  

^a PENN STATE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOLOGY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; HEMODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY; PULMONARY DISEASES; PUMPS; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS (CPB); PULSATILITY; ROLLER HEAD; SURPLUS HEMODYNAMIC ENERGY (SHE);

PEDIATRICS;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; ENERGY; FLOW RATE; HEART LUNG MACHINE; HEMODYNAMICS; INDUCED HYPOTHERMIA; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE; PULSATILE FLOW; PUMP; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPERFUSION; SWINE; WARMING; WAVEFORM;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; ENERGY METABOLISM; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HYPOTHERMIA, INDUCED; PULSATILE FLOW; REWARMING; SWINE;

EID: 26444564727     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mat.0000177780.39577.d2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Ündar A, Rosenberg G, Myers JL: Majors factors in the controversy of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile flow during acute and chronic cardiac support [editorial]. ASAIO J 51: 173-175, 2005.
2. Ündar A: Benefits of pulsatile flow during and after cardiopulmonary bypass procedures [editorial]. Artif Organs 29: 687-689, 2005.
3. Ündar A: Myths and truths of pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion during acute and chronic cardiac support [editorial]. Artif Organs 28: 439-443, 2004.
4. Ündar A: Principles and practices of pulsatile perfusion in pediatric and adult open-heart surgery. Turk J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 12: 215-219, 2004.
5. Ündar A: The ABCs of research on pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass [editorial]. Med Sci Monit 8: ED21-ED24, 2002.
6. Ündar A, Eichstaedt HC, Masai T, et al: Comparison of six pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass pumps during pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 122: 827-829, 2001.
7. Ündar A, Masai T, Frazier OH, Fraser CD Jr: Pulsatile and non-pulsatile flows can be quantified in terms of energy equivalent pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass for direct comparisons. ASAIO J 45: 610-614, 1999.
8. Shepard RB, Simpson DC, Sharp JF: Energy equivalent pressure. Arch Surg 93: 730-740, 1966.
9. Wright C: Hemodynamic analysis could resolve the pulsatile blood flow controversy. Ann Thorac Surg 58: 1199-204, 1994.
10. Ündar A, Masai T, Beyer EA, et al: Pediatric physiologic pulsatile pump enhances cerebral and renal blood flow during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Artif Organs 26: 919-923, 2002.
11. Ündar A, Masai T, Yang SQ, et al: Pulsatile perfusion improves regional myocardial blood flow during and after hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in a neonatal piglet model. ASAIO J 48: 90-95, 2002.
12. Ündar A, Masai T, Yang SQ, et al: Effects of perfusion mode on regional and global organ blood flow in a neonatal piglet model. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 1336-1343, 1999.
13. Ündar A, Eichstaedt HC, Frazier OH, Fraser CD: Monitoring regional cerebral oxygen saturation using near-infrared spectroscopy during pulsatile hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in a neonatal piglet model. ASAIO J 46: 103-106, 2000.
14. Ündar A: Design and performance of physiologic pulsatile flow cardiopulmonary bypass systems for neonates and infants [PhD dissertation]. The University of Texas at Austin, May 1996.
15. Ündar A, Zapanta CM, Reibson JD, et al: Precise quantification of pressure-flow waveforms of a pulsatile VAD during chronic support. ASAIO J 51: 56-59, 2005.
16. Ündar A, Eichstaedt HC, Bigley JE, et al: Effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion on cerebral hemodynamics investigated using a new pediatric pump. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124: 413-416, 2002.
17. Ündar A, Lodge AJ, Daggett CW, et al: The type of aortic cannula and membrane oxygenator affect the pulsatile waveform morphology produced by a neonate-infant cardiopulmonary bypass system in vivo. Artif Organs 22: 681-686, 1998.
18. Gourlay T, Gibbons M, Taylor KM: Pulsatile flow compatibility of a group of membrane oxygenators. Perfusion 2: 115-126, 1987.
19. Ündar A, Koenig KM, Frazier OH, Fraser CD: Impact of membrane oxygenators on pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion in a neonatal model. Perfusion 15: 111-120, 2000.
20. Ündar A, Lodge AJ, Daggett CW, et al: Design and performance of a physiologic pulsatile flow neonate-infant cardiopulmonary bypass system. ASAIO J 42: M580-583, 1996.
21. Kim HK, Son HS, Fang YH, et al: The effects of pulsatile flow upon renal tissue perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: A comparative study of pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow. ASAIO J 51: 30-36, 2005.
22. Cu YJ, Dekroon TL, Elstrodt JM, et al: Augmentation of abdominal organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass with a novel intra-aortic pulsatile catheter pump. Int J Artif Organs 28: 35-43, 2005.