Clinical Effectiveness of Centrifugal Pump to Produce Pulsatile Flow During Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Artificial Organs

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Gu, Y John ^a,c   Van Oeveren, Willem ^a   Mungroop, Hubert E ^b   Epema, Anne H ^b   Den Hamer, Inez J ^c   Keizer, Jorrit J ^c   Leuvenink, Ron P ^c   Mariani, Massimo A ^c   Rakhorst, Gerhard ^a  

^a Departments of Biomedical Engineering   (Netherlands)

^b Anesthesiology   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary bypass; Centrifugal pump; Pulsatile flow

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL HEART; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; PULSATILE FLOW;

ADULT PATIENTS; CARDIAC-SURGERY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING; HEMODYNAMIC ENERGY; PERFORMANCE; PULSATILE PUMP; PULSATILES; SURPLUS HEMODYNAMIC ENERGIES;

HEART;

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CENTRIFUGATION; CENTRIFUGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; FEMALE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; PULSE PRESSURE; PUMP;

EID: 79951637555     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01152.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Taylor KM, Bain WH, Davidson KG, Turner MA. Comparative clinical study of pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion in 350 consecutive patients. Thorax 1982;37:324-30.
2. Ündar A. Benefits of pulsatile flow during and after cardiopulmonary bypass procedures. Artif Organs 2005;29:688-90.
3. Shepard RB. Quantitative assessment of mechanical energy in pulsatile blood flow during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:931-2.
4. Ündar A, Eichstaedt HC, Masai T, Bigley JE, Kunselman AR. Precise quantification of pulsatility is a necessity for direct comparisons of six different pediatric heart-lung machines in a neonatal CPB model. ASAIO J 2005;51:600-3.
5. Murkin JM. Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion revisited. J Card Surg 2006;21:355-6.
6. Klein M, Dauben HP, Schulte HD, Gams E. Centrifugal pumping during routine open heart surgery improves clinical outcome. Artif Organs 1998;22:326-36.
7. Parolari A, Alamanni F, Naliato M, etal. Adult cardiac surgery outcomes: role of the pump type. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:575-82.
8. Hansbro SD, Sharpe DA, Catchpole R, etal. Haemolysis during cardiopulmonary bypass: an in vivo comparison of standard roller pumps, non-occlusive roller pumps and centrifugal pumps. Perfusion 1999;14:3-10.
9. Ashraf S, Butler J, Tian Y, etal. Inflammatory mediators in adults undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison of centrifugal and roller pumps. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:480-4.
10. Driessen JJ, Fransen G, Rondelez L, Schelstraete E, Gevaert L. Comparison of the standard roller pump and a pulsatile centrifugal pump for extracorporeal circulation during routine coronary artery bypass grafting. Perfusion 1991;6:303-11.
11. Driessen JJ, Dhaese H, Fransen G, etal. Pulsatile compared with nonpulsatile perfusion using a centrifugal pump for cardiopulmonary bypass during coronary artery bypass grafting. Effects on systemic haemodynamics, oxygenation, and inflammatory response parameters. Perfusion 1995;10:3-12.
12. Ündar A, Ji B, Lukic B, etal. Quantification of perfusion modes in terms of surplus hemodynamic energy levels in a simulated pediatric CPB model. ASAIO J 2006;52:712-7.
13. Loef BG, Epema AH, Navis G, Ebels T, van Oeveren W, Henning RH. Off-pump coronary revascularization attenuates transient renal damage compared with on-pump coronary revascularization. Chest 2002;121:1190-4.
14. Rosner MH, Portilla D, Okusa MD. Cardiac surgery as a cause of acute kidney injury: pathogenesis and potential therapies. J Intensive Care Med 2008;23:3-18.
15. Egashira K. Molecular mechanisms mediating inflammation in vascular disease: special reference to monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Hypertension 2003;41:834-41.
16. Harboe H. A method for determination of haemoglobin in plasma by near UV spectroscopy. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1959;11:66-70.
17. Ündar A, Eichstaedt HC, Masai T, etal. Comparison of six pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass pumps during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:827-9.
18. Gourlay T, Gibbons M, Taylor KM. Pulsatile flow compatibility of a group of membrane oxygenators. Perfusion 1987;2:115-26.
19. Segers PA, Heida JF, de Vries I, Maas C, Boogaart AJ, Eilander S. Clinical evaluation of nine hollow-fibre membrane oxygenators. Perfusion 2001;16:95-106.
20. Gu YJ, De Kroon TL, Elstrodt JM, van Oeveren W, Boonstra PW, Rakhorst G. Augmentation of abdominal organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass with a novel intra-aortic pulsatile catheter pump. Int J Artif Organs 2005;28:35-43.
21. Murkin JM, Martzke JS, Buchan AM, Bentley C, Wong CJ. A randomized study of the influence of perfusion technique and pH management strategy in 316 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. I. Mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:340-8.
22. Onorati F, Santarpino G, Rubino AS, etal. Body perfusion during adult cardiopulmonary bypass is improved by pulsatile flow with intra-aortic balloon pump. Int J Artif Organs 2009;32:50-61.
23. Lim CH, Son HS, Fang YH, etal. Hemodynamic energy generated by a combined centrifugal pump with an intra-aortic balloon pump. ASAIO J 2006;52:592-4.
24. Onorati F, Santarpino G, Presta P, etal. Pulsatile perfusion with intra-aortic balloon pumping ameliorates whole body response to cardiopulmonary bypass in the elderly. Crit Care Med 2009;37:902-11.
25. Onorati F, Santarpino G, Tangredi G, etal. Intra-aortic balloon pump induced pulsatile perfusion reduces endothelial activation and inflammatory response following cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:1012-9.
26. Herreros J, Ubilla M, Berjano EJ, etal. In vivo assessment of a new method of pulsatile perfusion based on a centrifugal pump. Artif Organs 2010;34:140-6.