The relationship between anti-gay prejudice and the categorization of sexual orientation

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 77, Issue , 2015, Pages 74-80

  Rule, Nicholas O ^a   Tskhay, Konstantin O ^a   Brambilla, Marco ^b   Riva, Paolo ^b   Andrzejewski, Susan A ^c   Krendl, Anne C ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anti gay bias; Individual differences; Prejudice; Sexual orientation; Social categorization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922567575     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.038     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allport G. The nature of prejudice 1954, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
2. Allport G.W., Kramer B.M. Some roots of prejudice. Journal of Psychology 1946, 22:9-39.
3. Andrzejewski S.A., Hall J.A., Salib E.R. Anti-Semitism and identification of Jewish group membership from photographs. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 2009, 33:47-58.
4. Anselmi P., Vianello M., Voci A., Robusto E. Implicit sexual attitude of heterosexual, gay and bisexual individuals: Disentangling the contribution of specific associations to the overall measure. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e78990.
5. Brambilla M., Riva P., Rule N.O. Familiarity increases the accuracy of categorizing male sexual orientation. Personality and Individual Differences 2013, 55:193-195.
6. Brewer M.B. A dual process model of impression formation. Advances in social cognition 1988, Vol. 1:1-36. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
7. Carter J.D., Hall J.A., Carney D.R., Rosip J.C. Individual differences in the acceptance of stereotyping. Journal of Research in Personality 2006, 40:1103-1118.
8. Castano E., Yzerbyt V., Bourguignon D., Seron E. Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2002, 38:315-322.
9. Cohen J. Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
10. Dasgupta N., Rivera L.M. From automatic antigay prejudice to behavior: The moderating role of conscious beliefs about gender and behavioral control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 91:268-280.
11. Freeman J.B., Ambady N. MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods 2010, 42:226-241.
12. Gabriel U., Banse R., Hug F. Predicting private and public helping behaviour by implicit attitudes and the motivation to control prejudiced reactions. British Journal of Social Psychology 2007, 46:365-382.
13. Greenwald A.G., McGhee D.E., Schwartz J.L. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74:1464-1480.
14. Hall J.A., Andrzejewski S.A., Yopchick J.E. Psychosocial correlates of interpersonal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 2009, 33:149-180.
15. Herek G.M. Heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. The Journal of Sex Research 1988, 25:451-477.
16. Herek G.M. The attitudes toward lesbians and gay men (ATLG) scale. Handbook of sexuality-related measures 1998, 392-394. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. C.M. Davis, W.L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, S.L. Davis (Eds.).
17. Hewstone M. Living apart, living together? The role of intergroup contact in social integration. Proceedings of the British Academy 2009, 162:243-300.
18. Hudson W.W., Ricketts W.A. A strategy for the measurement of homophobia. Journal of Homosexuality 1980, 5:357-372.
19. Inbar Y., Pizarro D.A., Knobe J., Bloom P. Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion 2009, 9:435-439.
20. Johnson K.L., Ghavami N. At the crossroads of conspicuous and concealable: What race categories communicate about sexual orientation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e18025.
21. Johnson K.L., Gill S., Reichman V., Tassinary L.G. Swagger, sway, and sexual orientation: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 93:321-334.
22. Karpinski A., Hilton J.L. Attitudes and the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81:774-788.
23. Leyens J.-P.h., Yzerbyt V.Y. The ingroup overexclusion effect: Impact of valence and confirmation on stereotypical information search. European Journal of Social Psychology 1992, 22:549-569.
24. Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (in press). The interpersonal consequences of processing ease: Fluency as a metacognitive foundation for prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science.
25. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
26. Marsh A.A., Kleck R.E., Ambady N. The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach- and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion 2005, 5:119-124.
27. McConahay J.B., Hardee B.B., Batts V. Has racism declined in America? It depends on who is asking. Journal of Conflict Resolution 1981, 25:563-579.
28. Morrison M.A., Morrison T.G. Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality 2002, 43:15-37.
29. Munson B., Babel M. Loose lips and silver tongues, or, projecting sexual orientation through speech. Language and Linguistics Compass 2007, 1:416-449.
30. Olson M.A., Fazio R. Relations between implicit measures of prejudice: What are we measuring?. Psychological Science 2003, 14:636-639.
31. Page-Gould E., Mendoza-Denton R., Alegre J.M., Siy J.O. Understanding the impact of cross-group friendship on interactions with novel outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2010, 98:775-793.
32. Pettigrew T.F., Tropp L.R. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 90:751-783.
33. Plant E.A., Devine P.G. Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75:811-832.
34. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Revised ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35. Rule N.O. The influence of target and perceiver race in the categorization of male sexual orientation. Perception 2011, 40:830-839.
36. Rule N.O., Ambady N. Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50-ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44:1100-1105.
37. Rule N.O., Ambady N., Adams R.B., Macrae C.N. Us and them: Memory advantages in perceptually ambiguous groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:687-692.
38. Rule N.O., Ambady N., Adams R.B., Macrae C.N. Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 95:1019-1028.
39. Rule N.O., Ambady N., Hallett K.C. Female sexual orientation is perceived accurately, rapidly, and automatically from the face and its features. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009, 45:1245-1251.
40. Rule N.O., Ishii K., Ambady N., Rosen K.S., Hallett K.C. Found in translation: Cross-cultural consensus in the accurate categorization of male sexual orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2011, 37:1449-1507.
41. Rule N.O., Rosen K.S., Slepian M.L., Ambady N. Mating interest improves women's accuracy in judging male sexual orientation. Psychological Science 2011, 22:881-886.
42. Savin-Williams R.C. Who's gay? Does it matter?. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2006, 15:40-44.
43. Stern C., West T.V., Jost J.T., Rule N.O. The politics of gaydar: Ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2013, 104:520-541.
44. Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2012). The Motivation to Avoid Sexual Discrimination Scale. Unpublished survey measure, University of Toronto.
45. Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (in press). Sexual orientation across culture and time. In S. Safdar & N. Kosakowska-Berzecka (Eds.). The psychology of gender and culture. New York: Springer.
46. Tskhay, K. O., Krendl, A. C., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Age-related physical changes interfere with sexual orientation judgments. Manuscript under review.
47. Tskhay K.O., Rule N.O. Accuracy in categorizing perceptually ambiguous groups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2013, 17:72-86.
48. Valentova J., Rieger G., Havlicek J., Linsenmeier J.A., Bailey J.M. Judgments of sexual orientation and masculinity-femininity based on thin slices of behavior: A cross-cultural comparison. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2011, 40:1145-1152.
49. Wilson J.P., Rule N.O. Perceptions of others' political affiliation are moderated by individual perceivers' own political attitudes. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e95431.