Statistical Analysis in Forensic Science: Evidential Values of Multivariate Physicochemical Data

Statistical Analysis in Forensic Science: Evidential Values of Multivariate Physicochemical Data

Volumn 9780470972106, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-322

  Zadora, Grzegorz ^a   Martyna, Agnieszka ^b   Ramos, Daniel ^c   Aitken, Colin ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC RESEARCH   (Poland)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS; REFRACTIVE INDEX;

ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS; ANALYTICAL METHOD; CONTAINER GLASS; EVIDENTIAL VALUE; PHYSICO-CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; PHYSICO-CHEMICAL DATA; QUANTITATIVE DATA; TRACE EVIDENCES;

DIGITAL FORENSICS;

EID: 84922459858     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118763155     Document Type: Book

References (156)

1. Adolf FP, Dunlop J 1999 Microspectrophotometry/colour measurements. In Forensic Examination of Fibres, 2nd edn, Robertson J, Grieve M (eds). Taylor & Francis, London.
2. Aitken CGG 2006a Statistics in forensic science. Part I. An aid to investigation. Problems of Forensic Sciences 65, 53-67.
3. Aitken CGG 2006b Statistics in forensic science. Part II. An aid to evaluation of evidence. Problems of Forensic Sciences 65, 68-81.
4. Aitken CGG, Zadora G, Lucy D 2007 A two-level model for evidence evaluation. Journal of Forensic Sciences 52, 412-419.
5. Almirall JR, Furton KG 2004 Analysis and interpretation of fire scene evidence. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
6. ASTM Standard Test Method for Ignitable Liquid Residues in Extracts from Fire Debris Samples by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry 2006. Annual Book of ASTM Standards.
7. Borusiewicz R 2002 Fire debris analysis - a survey of techniques used for accelerants isolation and concentration. Problems of Forensic Sciences 50, 44-63.
8. Borusiewicz R, Zieba-Palus J 2007 Comparison of the effectiveness of Tenax TA and Carbotrap 300 in concentration of flammable liquids compounds. Journal of Forensic Sciences 52, 70-74.
9. Borusiewicz R, Zieba-Palus J, Zadora G 2006 The influence of the type of accelerant, type of burned material, time of burning and availability of air on the possibility of detection of accelerants traces. Forensic Science International 160(2-3), 115-126.
10. Burns DT, Doolan KP 2005a A comparison of pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for the characterisation of automative paint samples. Analytica Chimica Acta 539, 145-155.
11. Burns DT, Doolan KP 2005b The discrimination of automotive clear coat paints indistinguishable by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy via pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta 539, 157-164.
12. Caddy B 2001 Forensic examination of glass and paints. Taylor & Francis, London and New York.
13. Casista AR, Sandercock PML 1994 Effects of annealing on toughened and non-toughened glass. Journal of Canadian Society of Forensic Science 27, 171-177.
14. Challinor JM 2007 Examination of forensic evidence. In Applied Pyrolysis Handbook, Wampler TP (ed). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 207-239.
15. Curran JM, Hicks TN, Buckleton JS 2000 Forensic interpretation of glass evidence. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
16. Evett IW 1977 The interpretation of refractive index measurement. Forensic Sciences International 9, 209-217.
17. Evett IW 1978 The interpretation of refractive index measurement II. Forensic Sciences International 12, 37-47.
18. Evett IW, Lambert JA 1982 The interpretation of refractive index measurement III. Forensic Sciences International 20, 237-245.
19. Falcone R, Sommariva G, Merita M 2006 WDXRF, EPMA and SEM/EDX quantitative chemical analyses of small glass samples. Microchimica Acta 155, 137-140.
20. Hicks TN, Monard-Sermier F, Goldmann T, Brunelle A, Champod C, Margot P 2003 The classification and discrimination of glass fragments using non destructive energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence. Forensic Science International 137, 107-118.
21. Kirk PL 1951 Density and Refractive Index: Their Application in Chemical Identification. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.
22. Kirkbride KP, Tungol MW 1999 Infrared microspectroscopy of fibres. In Forensic Examination of Fibres, 2nd edn, Robertson J, Grieve M (eds.), Taylor & Francis, London.
23. Koons RD, Fiedler C, Rawalt R 1988 Classification and discrimination of sheet and container glasses by inductively coupled plasma - atomic emission spectrometry and pattern recognition. Journal of Forensic Sciences, JFSCA 33, 49-67.
24. Latkoczy C, Becker S, Dücking M, Günther D, Hoogewerff J, Almirall JR, Buscaglia J, Dobney A, Koons RD, Montero S, van der Peijl G, Stoecklein W, Trejos T, Watling J, Zdanowicz V 2005 Development and evaluation of a standard method for the quantitative determination of elements in float glass samples by LA-ICP-MS. Journal of Forensic Sciences 50(6), 1327-1341.
25. Locke J, Underhill M 1985 Automatic refractive index measurement of glass particles. Forensic Science International 27, 247-260.
26. Lucy D, Zadora G 2011 Mixed effects modelling for glass category estimation from glass refractive indices. Forensic Science International 212, 189-197.
27. Mark P, Sandercock L 2007 Fire investigation and ignitable liquid residue analysis. A review: 2001-2007. Forensic Science International 176, 93-110.
28. Massonnet G, Stocklein W 1999 Identification of organic pigments in coatings: applications to red automotive topcoats: Part III: Raman spectroscopy (NIR FT-Raman). Science and Justice 39, 181-187.
29. Milczarek JM, Zieba-Palus J, Koscielniak P 2005 Application of pyrolysis-gas chromatography to car paint analysis for forensic purposes. Problems of Forensic Sciences 61, 7-18.
30. Neocleous T, Aitken CGG, Zadora G 2011 Transformations for compositional data with zeros with an application to forensic evidence evaluation. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 109, 77-85.
31. Newton AWN, Kitto L, Buckleton JS 2005 A study of the performance and utility of annealing in forensic glass analysis. Forensic Science International 115, 119-125.
32. Nic Daéid N 2004 Fire Investigation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
33. Olson LA 1986 Color comparison in questioned document examination using MSP. Journal of Forensic Sciences 4, 1330-1340.
34. Palenik SJ 1999 Microscopical examination of fibres. In Forensic Examination of Fibres, 2nd edn, Robertson J, Grieve M (eds). Taylor & Francis, London.
35. Ramos D, Zadora G 2011 Information-theoretical feature selection using data obtained by scanning electron microscopy coupled with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer for the classification of glass traces. Analytica Chimica Acta 705, 207-217.
36. Robertson J and GrieveM(eds) 1999 Forensic examination of fibres. In Forensic Examination of Fibres, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London.
37. Shevell SK 2003 The science of color. Elsevier, Oxford.
38. Stauffer E, Lentini JJ 2003 ASTM standards for fire debris analysis: a review. Forensic Science International 132, 63-67.
39. Suzuki EM, Carrabba M 2001 In situ identification and analysis of automotive paint pigments using line segment excitation Raman spectroscopy: I. Inorganic topcoat pigments. Journal of Forensic Sciences 46, 1053-1069.
40. Thornton JI, Crim D 2002 Forensic paint examination. In Forensic Science Handbook Saferstein R (ed.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
41. Trejos T, Almirall JR 2005a Sampling strategies for the analysis of glass fragments by LA-ICP-MS Part I: Micro-homogeneity study of glass and its application to the interpretation of forensic evidence. Talanta 67, 388-395.
42. Trejos T, Almirall JR 2005b Sampling strategies for the analysis of glass fragments by LA-ICP-MS Part II: Sample size and sample shape considerations. Talanta 67, 396-401.
43. Zadora G 2007a Glass analysis for forensic purposes - a comparison of classification methods. Journal of Chemometrics 21, 174-186.
44. Zadora G 2007b Laundering of 'illegal' fuels - a forensic chemistry perspective. Acta Chimica Slovenica 54, 110-113.
45. Zadora G 2009 Classification of glass fragments based on elemental composition and refractive index. Journal of Forensic Sciences 54, 49-59.
46. Zadora G 2010 Evaluation of evidential value of physicochemical data by a Bayesian network approach. Journal of Chemometrics 24, 346-366.
47. Zadora G, Borusiewicz R 2010 Fire scene and fire debris analysis. In INTERPOL's Forensic Science Review, Nic Daéid N, Hauck MM (eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 562-589.
48. Zadora G, Brozek-Mucha Z 2003 SEM-EDX - a useful tool for forensic examinations. Material Chemistry and Physics 81, 345-348.
49. Zadora G, Neocleous T 2009a Likelihood ratio model for classification of forensic evidences. Analytica Chimica Acta 64, 266-278.
50. Zadora G, Neocleous T 2009b Evidential value of physicochemical data - comparison of methods of glass database creation. Journal of Chemometrics 24, 367-378.
51. Zadora G, Wilk D, 2009 Evaluation of evidence value of refractive index measured before and after annealing of container and float glass fragments. Problems of Forensic Sciences 80, 365-377.
52. Zadora G, Zuba D 2010 Gas chromatography in forensic science, Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. Wiley, Chichester.
53. Zadora G, Neocleous T, Aitken CGG 2010 A two-level model for evidence evaluation in the presence of zeros. Journal of Forensic Sciences 55, 371-384.
54. Zieba-Palus J 1999 Application of micro-FTIR to the examination of paint samples. Journal of Molecular Structure 511-512, 327-335.
55. Zieba-Palus J 2005 Microspectrophotometry in forensic science. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. Wiley, Chichester.
56. Zieba-Palus J, Borusiewicz R 2006 Examination of multilayer paint coats by the use of infrared, Raman and XRF spectroscopy for forensic purposes. Journal of Molecular Structure 792-793, 286-292.
57. Zieba-Palus J, Zadora G, Milczarek JM, Koscielniak P 2008a Pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis as a useful tool in forensic examination of automotive paint traces. Journal of Chromatography A 1179, 41-46.
58. Zieba-Palus J, Zadora G, Milczarek JM 2008b Differentiation and evaluation of evidence value of styrene acrylic urethane topcoat car paints analysed by pyrolysis-gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A 1179, 47-58.
59. Zieba-Palus J, Michalska A, Weselucha-Birczynska A, 2011 Characterisation of paint samples by infrared and Raman spectroscopy for criminalistic purposes. Journal of Molecular Structure 993, 134-141.
60. Aitken CGG 2006a Statistics in forensic science. Part I. An aid to investigation. Problems of Forensic Sciences 65, 53-67.
61. Aitken CGG 2006b Statistics in forensic science. Part II. An aid to evaluation of evidence. Problems of Forensic Sciences 65, 68-81.
62. Aitken CGG, Lucy D 2004 Evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data. Applied Statistics 53, 109-122.
63. Aitken CGG, Taroni F 2004 Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists. In 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester.
64. Aitken CGG, Lucy D, Zadora G, Curran JM 2006 Evaluation of trace evidence for three-level multivariate data with the use of graphical models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 50, 2571-2588.
65. Aitken CGG, Zadora G, Lucy D 2007 A two-level model for evidence evaluation. Journal of Forensic Sciences 52, 412-419.
66. Aitken CGG, Roberts P, Jackson G 2012 Fundamentals of Probability and Statistical Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. Royal Statistical Society, London.
67. Andersson K, Lock E, Jalava K, Huizer H, Jonson S, Kaa E, Lopes A, Poortman-van der Meer A, Sippola E, Dujourdy L, Dahlen J 2007 Development of a harmonized method for the profiling of amphetamines VI. Evaluation of methods for comparison of amphetamine. Forensic Science International 169, 86-99.
68. Bishop CM 2006 Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, New York.
69. Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ and Lambert JA 1998a A model for case assessment and interpretation. Science and Justice 38, 151-156.
70. Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ and Lambert JA 1998b A hierarchy of propositions: Deciding which level to address in casework. Science and Justice 38, 231-239.
71. Curran JM, Hicks TN, Buckleton JS 2000 Forensic Interpretation of Glass evidence, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
72. Doble P, Sandercock M, Du Pasquier E, Petocz P, Roux C, Dawson M 2003 Classification of premium and regular gasoline by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, principal component analysis and artificial neural networks. Forensic Science International 132, 26-39.
73. Evett IW, et al. 2011 Expressing Evaluative Opinions: A Position Statement. Science and Justice 51, 1-2.
74. Evett IW, Weir BS 1998 Interpreting DNA Evidence. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
75. Evett IW, Jackson G, Lambert JA, McCrossan S 2000 The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation and the structure and content of statements. Science and Justice 40, 233-239.
76. Hickman DA 1987 Glass types identified by chemical analysis. Forensic Science International 33, 23-46.
77. Hicks TN, Monard-Sermier F, Goldmann T, Brunelle A, Champod C, Margot P 2003 The classification and discrimination of glass fragments using non destructive energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence. Forensic Science International 137, 107-118.
78. Kellner R, Mermet JM, Otto M, Valcarcel M,Widmer HM (eds.) 2004 Analytical Chemistry: A Modern Approach to Analytical Science, 2nd edn. Wiley VCH, Weinheim.
79. Kher A, Mulholland M, Reedy B, Maynard P 2001 Classification of document papers by infrared spectroscopy and multivariate statistical techniques. Applied Spectroscopy 55, 1192-1198.
80. Kher A, Mulholland M, Green E, Reedy B 2006 Forensic classification of ballpoint pen inks using high performance liquid chromatography and infrared spectroscopy with principal components analysis and linear discriminant analysis. Vibration Spectroscopy 40, 270-277.
81. Klemenc S 2001 In common batch searching of illicit heroin samples - evaluation of data by chemometric methods. Forensic Science International 115, 43-52.
82. Koons RD, Buscaglia J 1999 The forensic significance of glass composition and refractive index measurements. Journal of Forensic Sciences 44, 496-503.
83. Koons RD, Buscaglia J 2002 Interpretation of glass composition measurements: The effects of match criteria on discrimination capability. Journal of Forensic Sciences 47, 505-512.
84. Koons RD, Fiedler C, Rawalt R 1988 Classification and discrimination of sheet and container glasses by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry and pattern recognition. Journal of Forensic Sciences 33, 49-67.
85. Lucy D 2005 Introduction to Statistics for Forensic Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
86. Martyna A, Zadora G, Stanimirova I, Ramos D 2013 Wine authenticity verification as a forensic problem. An application of likelihood ratio approach to label verification. Food Chemistry.
87. Neocleous T, Aitken CGG, Zadora G 2011 Transformations for compositional data with zeros with an application to forensic evidence evaluation. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 109, 77-85.
88. Otto M 2007 Statistics and Computer Application in Analytical Chemistry. Wiley VCH, Weinheim.
89. Pierrini G, Doyle S, Champod C, Taroni F,Wakelin D, Lock C 2007 Evaluation of preliminary isotopic analysis (13C and 15N) of explosives. A likelihood ratio approach to assess the links between Semtex samples. Forensic Science International 167, 43-48.
90. Ramos D 2007 Forensic evaluation of the evidence using automatic speaker recognition systems. PhD thesis, Depto. de Ingeniería Informática, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Available at http://atvs.ii.uam.es.
91. Robertson B, Vignaux GA 1995 Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
92. Thanasoulias NC, Parisis NA, Evmiridis NP 2003 Multivariate chemometrics for the forensic discrimination of blue ball-point pen inks based on their VIS spectra. Forensic Science International 138, 75-84.
93. Zadora G 2007 Glass analysis for forensic purposes - a comparison of classification methods. Journal of Chemometrics 21, 174-186.
94. Zadora G 2009 Classification of glass fragments based on elemental composition and refractive index. Journal of Forensic Sciences 54, 49-59.
95. Zadora G, Neocleous T 2009 Likelihood ratio model for classification of forensic evidences. Analytica Chimica Acta 64, 266-278.
96. Zadora G 2010 Evaluation of the evidence value of physicochemical data by a Bayesian network approach. Journal of Chemometrics 24, 346-366.
97. Zadora G, Piekoszewski W, Parczewski A 2003 An application of chosen similarity measurements of objects for forensic purposes. In Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute 54th Session 60, 364-367.
98. Zadora G, Neocleous T, Aitken CGG 2010 A two-level model for evidence evaluation in the presence of zeros. Journal of Forensic Sciences 55, 371-384.
99. Zieba-Palus J, Zadora G, Milczarek JM 2008 Differentiation and evaluation of evidence value of styrene acrylic urethane topcoat car paints analysed by pyrolysis-gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A 1179, 47-58.
100. Adam C 2010 Essential Mathematics and Statistics for Forensic Science. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester.
101. Aitken CGG and Taroni F 2004 Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
102. Aitken CGG, Zadora G, Lucy D 2007 A two-level model for evidence evaluation. Journal of Forensic Sciences 52, 412-419.
103. Andersson K, Lock E, Jalava K, Huizer H, Jonson S, Kaa E, Lopes A, Poortman-van der Meer A, Sippola E, Dujourdy L, Dahlen J 2007 Development of a harmonized method for the profiling of amphetamines VI. Evaluation of methods for comparison of amphetamine. Forensic Science International 169, 86-99.
104. Bozza S, Taroni F, Marquis R, Schmittbuhl M 2008 Probabilistic evaluation of handwriting evidence: Likelihood ratio for authorship. Applied Statistics 57, 329-341.
105. Curran JM 2011 Introduction to Data Analysis with R for Forensic Scientists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
106. Evans M, Hastings N, Peacock B 2000 Statistical Distributions, 3rd edn. JohnWiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
107. Kellner R, Mermet JM, Otto M, Valcarcel M,Widmer HM (eds) 2004 Analytical Chemistry: A Modern Approach to Analytical Science. 2nd edn. Wiley VCH, Wienheim, Germany.
108. Klemenc S 2001 In common batch searching of illicit heroin samples - evaluation of data by chemometric methods. Forensic Science International 115, 43-52.
109. Lucy D 2005 Introduction to Statistics for Forensic Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
110. Martyna A, Sjastad K-E, Zadora G, Ramos D 2013 Analysis of lead isotopic ratios of glass objects with the aim of comparing them for forensic purposes. Talanta 105, 158-166.
111. Otto M 2007 Statistics and Computer Application in Analytical Chemistry. Wiley VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
112. Silverman BW 1986 Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall, London.
113. Spence LD, Baker AT, Byrne JP 2000 Characterization of document paper using elemental compositions determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectroscopy 15, 813-819.
114. Stephenson G 1973 Mathematical Methods for Science Students (2nd edn). Longman, London.
115. Whittaker J 1990 Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
116. Zadora G, Neocleous T 2009 Likelihood ratio model for classification of forensic evidence. Analytica Chimica Acta 64, 266-278.
117. Zadora G, Wilk D, 2009 Evaluation of evidence value of refractive index measured before and after annealing of container and float glass fragments. Problems of Forensic Sciences 80, 365-377.
118. Zadora G, Neocleous T, Aitken CGG 2010 A two-level model for evidence evaluation in the presence of zeros. Journal of Forensic Sciences 55, 371-384.
119. Zieba-Palus J, Zadora G, Milczarek JM 2008 Differentiation and evaluation of evidence value of styrene acrylic urethane topcoat car paints analysed by pyrolysis-gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A 1179, 47-58.
120. Aitken CGG 1986 Statistical discriminant analysis in forensic science. Journal of Forensic Sciences 26, 237-247.
121. Aitken CGG, Taroni F 2004 Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
122. Aitken CGG, Lucy D 2004 Evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data. Applied Statistics 53, 109-122.
123. Berry DA 1991 Inferences in forensic identification and paternity cases using hypervariable DNA sequences (with discussion). Statistical Science 6, 175-205.
124. Berry DA, Evett IW, Pinchin R 1992 Statistical inference in crime investigations using deoxyribonucleic acid profiling (with discussion). Applied Statistics 41, 499-531.
125. Borusiewicz R, Zieba-Palus J, Zadora G 2006 The influence of the type of accelerant, type of burned material, time of burning and availability of air on the possibility of detection of accelerants traces. Forensic Science International 160(2-3), 115-126.
126. Chan KPS, Aitken CGG 1989 Estimation of the Bayes' factor in a forensic science problem. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 33, 249-264.
127. Evett IW, Cage PE, Aitken CGG 1987 Evaluation of the likelihood ratio for fibre transfer evidence in criminal cases. Applied Statistics 36, 174-180.
128. Taroni F, Bozza S, Biedermann A, Garbolino P and Aitken CGG 2010 Data Analysis in Forensic Science: A Bayesian Decision Perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
129. Zadora G 2009 Classification of glass fragments based on elemental composition and refractive index. Journal of Forensic Sciences 54, 49-59.
130. Zadora G 2010 Evaluation of evidential value of physicochemical data by a Bayesian network approach. Journal of Chemometrics 24, 346-366.
131. Zadora G, Neocleous T 2009 Likelihood ratio model for classification of forensic evidences. Analytica Chimica Acta 64, 266-278.
132. Zadora G, Borusiewicz R, Zieba-Palus J 2005 Differentiation between weathered kerosene and diesel fuel using automatic thermal desorption-GC-MS analysis and the likelihood ratio approach. Journal of Separation Sciences 28(13), 1467-1475.
133. Zadora G, Neocleous T, Aitken CGG 2010 A two-level model for evidence evaluation in the presence of zeros. Journal of Forensic Sciences 55, 371-384.
134. Aitken CGG and Taroni F 2004 Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
135. Brümmer N 2010 Measuring, refining and calibrating speaker and language information extracted from speech. PhD thesis, School of Electrical Engineering, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa. Available at http://sites.google.com/site/nikobrummer/ (last accessed 2 October 2012).
136. Brümmer N and du Preez J 2006 Application independent evaluation of speaker detection. Computer Speech and Language 20(2-3), 230-275.
137. Cover TMand Thomas JA 2006 Elements of Information Theory, 2nd edn.Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ.
138. Dawid AP 1982 The well-calibrated Bayesian. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77(379), 605-610.
139. Dawid AP 2004 Statistics and the law. Technical report, University College London. Available at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/
140. deGroot MH and Fienberg SE 1983 The comparison and evaluation of forecasters. The Statistician 32, 12-22.
141. Duda RO, Hart PE and Stork DG 2001 Pattern Classification. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
142. Evett IW 1998 Towards a uniform framework for reporting opinions in forensic science casework. Science and Justice 38(3), 198-202.
143. Evett IW and Buckleton JS 1996 Statistical analysis of STR data. In B. Brinkmann, A Carracedo, and W. Bär (eds), Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics 6, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 6, 79-86.
144. Garthwaite PH, Kadane JB and O'Hagan A 2005 Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100(470), 680-701.
145. Gneiting T and Raftery A 2007 Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction and estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 102, 359-378.
146. Lindley DV 2006 Understanding Uncertainty. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ.
147. Lindley DV, Tversky A and Brown RV 1979 On the reconciliation of probability assessments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 142(2), 146-180.
148. Martin A, Doddington G, Kamm T, Ordowski M and Przybocki M 1997 The DET curve in assessment of decision task performance. Proc. of Eurospeech, pp. 1895-1898.
149. O'Hagan T 2004 Dicing with the unknown. Significance 1(3), 132-133.
150. Ramos D 2007 Forensic evaluation of the evidence using automatic speaker recognition systems PhD thesis Depto. de Ingenieria Informatica, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain. Available at http://atvs.ii.uam.es.
151. Ramos D and Gonzalez-Rodriguez J 2013 Reliable support: measuring calibration of likelihood ratios. Forensic Science International 230(1-3), 156-169.
152. Ramos D, Gonzalez-Rodriguez J, Zadora G and Aitken CGG 2013 Information-theoretical assessment of the performance of likelihood ratio computation methods. Journal of Forensic Sciences. In press.
153. Royall R 1997 Statistical Evidence, A Likelihood Paradigm. Chapman & Hall, London.
154. Royall R 2000 On the probability of observing statistical misleading evidence. Journal of the American Statistical Association 95(451), 760-768.
155. Savage L 1971 The elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66(336), 783-801.
156. Taroni F, Bozza S, Biedermann A, Garbolino P and Aitken CGG 2010 Data Analysis in Forensic Science: A Bayesian Decision Perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.