Statistics in forensic science. Part I. An aid to investigation;Statystyka w naukach sa̧dowych. Czȩść I. Statystyka jako użyteczne narzȩdzie na etapie dochodzeniowym śledztwa

Problems of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 65, Issue , 2006, Pages 53-67

  Aitken, Colin G G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

DNA; Familial relationships; Offender profiling; Pre assessment; Relevant propositions; Sample size estimation

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CRIME; FORENSIC SCIENCE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; OFFENDER; STATISTICS;

EID: 34249690128     PISSN: 12307483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Aitken C. G. G., Sampling - how big a sample?, Journal of Forensic Sciences 1999, 44, 750-760.
2. Aitken C. G. G., Statistics in forensic science II: The evaluation of evidence, Problems of Forensic Sciences 2006, 65, 68-81.
3. Aitken C. G. G., Connolly T., Gammerman A. [et al.], Predicting an offender's characteristics: an evaluation of statistical modeling, Police Research Group, Special Interest Series Group 4; London 1995.
4. Aitken C. G. G., Connolly T., Gammerman A. [et al.], Statistical modeling in specific case analysis, Science & Justice 1996, 36, 245-255.
5. Aitken C.G.G., Gammerman A., Zhang G. [et al.], Bayesian belief networks with an application in specific case analysis, [in:] Computational learning and probabilistic reasoning, Gammerman A. [ed.], John Wiley & Sons, London 1996.
6. Aitken C. G. G., Taroni F., Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester 2004.
7. Ashcroft C. M., Evans S., Tebbett I. R., The persistence of fibers in head hair, Journal of the Forensic Science Society 1988, 28, 289-293.
8. Buckleton J., Triggs C. M., Walsh S. J. [ed.], Forensic DNA evidence interpretation, CRC Press, Boca Raton 2005.
9. th Meeting of European Fibres Group, Krakow 2000, 33-45.
10. Cook R., Webb-Salter M. T., Marshall L., The significance of fibres found in head hair, Forensic Science International 1997, 87, 155-160.
11. Cook R., Evett I. W., Jackson,G. [et al.], A model for case assessment and interpretation, Science & Justice 1998, 38, 151-156.
12. Cook R., Evett I. W., Jackson G. [et al.], A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in case-work, Science & Justice 1998, 38, 231-239.
13. Cook R., Evett I. W., Jackson G. [et al.], Case pre-assessment and review of a two-way transfer case, Science & Justice 1999, 39, 103-122.
14. European Network of Forensic Science Institutes Drugs Working Group (2004), Guidelines on representative drug sampling, http://www.enfsi.org.
15. Evett I. W., Jackson G., Lambert J. A. [et al.], The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation and the structure and content of statements, Science & Justice 2000, 40, 233-239.
16. Evett I. W., Jackson G., Lambert J. A., More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions, Science & Justice 2000, 40, 3-10.
17. Salter M. T., Cook R., Transfer of fibres to head hair, their persistence and retrieval, Forensic Science International 1996, 81, 211-221.