Evaluation of evidence value of refractive index measured before and after annealing of container and float glass fragments;Ocena wartościdowodowej współczynnika załamania światła zmierzonego przed i po wykonaniu procesu odprȩżania okruchów szkła opakowaniowego, okiennego i z szyb samochodowych

Problems of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 80, Issue , 2009, Pages 365-385

  Zadora, Grzegorz ^a   Wilk, Dariusz ^b,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC RESEARCH   (Poland)

^b INSTITUTE OF CATALYSIS AND SURFACE CHEMISTRY   (Poland)

^c JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Annealing of glass fragments; Bayesian networks; Classification; Evidence values of refractive index of glass fragments; Likelihood ratio

Indexed keywords

GLASS;

ANNEALING; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; CONTAINER; MEASUREMENT; PROCESS DESIGN; REFRACTION INDEX; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE; TENSION;

EID: 77951988328     PISSN: 12307483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aitken C. G. G., Taroni F., Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 2004.
2. Aitken C. G. G., Zadora G., Lucy D., A two-level model for evidence evaluation, Journal of Forensic Sciences 2007, 52, 412-419.
3. Caddy B., Forensic examination of glass and paint. Analysis and interpretation, Taylor & Francis, London 2001.
4. Casista A. R., Sandercock P. M. L., Effects of annealing on toughened and non-thoughened glass, Journal of Canadian Society of Forensic Science 1994, 27, 171-177. (Pubitemid 24319090)
5. Hicks T., Monard Sermier F., Goldmann T. [et al.], The classification and discrimination of glass fragments using non destructive energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence, Forensic Science International 2003, 137, 107-118. (Pubitemid 37373619)
6. Locke J., Hayes C. A., The identification of toughened glass by annealing, Forensic Science International 1984, 20, 295-301.
7. Locke J., Winstanley R., Rockett L. A. [et al.], A comparison of long and short schedules for annealing of glass particles, Forensic Science International 1985, 29, 247-258. (Pubitemid 16206153)
8. Marcouiller J. M., A revised glass annealing method to distinguish glass types, Journal of Forensic Sciences 1990, 35, 554-559. (Pubitemid 20151960)
9. Newton A. W. N., Kitto L., Bucleton J. S., A study of the performance and utility of annealing in forensic glass analysis, Forensic Science International 2005, 155, 119-125.
10. Pawluk-Kołc M., Ziȩba-Palus J., Parczewski A., Application of false discovery rate procedure to pairwise comparisons of refractive index of glass fragments, Forensic Science International 2006, 160, 53-58. (Pubitemid 43949455)
11. Pawluk-Kołc M., Ziȩba-Palus J., Parczewski A., The effect of re-annealing on the distribution of refractive index in a windscreen and a windowpane, Forensic Science International 2008, 174, 222-228.
12. Rayland S. G., Sheet or container? - Forensic glass comparions with an emphasis on source classification, Journal of Forensic Sciences 1986, 31, 1314-1329.
13. Royal R., Statistical evidence, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, London 1992.
14. Taroni F., Aitken C., Garbolino P., Biedermann A., Bayesian Networks and probability inferences in forensic sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 2006.
15. Trejos T., Almirall J. R., Sampling strategies for the analysis of glass fragments LA-ICP-MS. Part 1: micro-homogeneity study of glass and its application to the interpretation of forensic evidence, Talanta 2005, 67, 388-395.
16. Underhill M., The annealing of glass. Notes for caseworkers, Metropolitan Police Forensic Science Laboratory, Aldermaston, London 1992.
17. Wachowicz M. J., Szkło w kryminalistyce. Technologia produkcji przedmiotów szklanych a współczynnik załamania światła, zestaw GRIM 2, Problemy Kryminalistyki 2004, 245, 11-37.
18. Winstanley R., Rydeard C., Concepts of annealing applied to small glass fragments, Forensic Science International 1985, 29, 1-10. (Pubitemid 16217527)
19. Zadora G., Classification of glass fragments based on elemental composition and refractive index, Journal of Forensic Sciences 2009, 54, 49-59.
20. Zadora G., Evaluation of evidence value of glass fragments by likelihood ratio and Bayesian Network approaches, Analytica Chimica Acta 2009, 642, 279-290.
21. Zadora G., Brożek-Mucha Z., SEM-EDX - a useful tool for forensic examinations, Materials Chemistry and Physics 2003, 81, 345-348.
22. Zadora G., Neocleous T., Likelihood ratio model for classification of forensic evidences, Analytica Chimica Acta 2009, 642, 266-278.