Statistics in forensic science. Part II. An aid to the evaluation of evidence;Statystyka w naukach sa̧dowych. Czȩść II. Statystyka jako pomoc w oszacowaniu wartości materiału dowodowego

Problems of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 65, Issue , 2006, Pages 68-81

  Aitken, Colin G G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evidence evaluation; Interpretation of evidence; Likelihood ratio; Significance testing

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; FORENSIC SCIENCE; LEGAL ASPECT; LEGAL EVIDENCE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIST; STATISTICS;

EID: 34249752643     PISSN: 12307483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Aitken C. G. G., Statistics in forensic science I: An aid to investigation, Problems of Forensic Sciences 2006, 65, 53-67.
2. Aitken C. G. G., Taroni F., Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester 2004.
3. Aitken C. G. G, Taroni F., Garbolino P., A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles, Theoretical Population Biology 2003, 63, 179-190
4. Aitken C. G. G., Lucy D., Zadora G. [et al.], Evaluation of transfer evidence for three-level multivariate data with the use of graphical models, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2006, 50, 2571-2588.
5. Darboux J. G., Appell P. E., Poincaré J. H., Examen critique des divers systémes ou études graphologiques auxquels a donné lieu le bordereau, [in:] L'affaire Drefus - la révision du procès de Rennes - enquête de la chambre criminelle de la Cour de Cassation, Ligue Française des Droits de l'Homme et du Citoyen, Paris 1908.
6. Evett I. W., A Bayesian approach to the problem of interpreting glass evidence in forensic science casework, Journal of the Forensic Science Society 1986, 26, 3-18.
7. Srihari S. N., Cha S. H., Arora H. [et al.], Individuality of handwriting, Journal of Forensic Sciences 2002, 47, 856-872.
8. Taroni F, Aitken C. G. G., Probabilistic reasoning in the law, part 1 : assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of DNA evidence, Science & Justice 1998, 38, 165-177.
9. Thompson W. C., Schumann E. L., Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials. The prosecutor's fallacy and the defence attorney's fallacy, Law and Human Behaviour 1987, 11, 167-187.