Population Genomics Reveals Chromosome-Scale Heterogeneous Evolution in a Protoploid Yeast

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 184-192

  Friedrich, Anne ^a   Jung, Paul ^a   Reisser, Cyrielle ^a   Fischer, Gilles ^b,c   Schacherer, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Chromosome evolution; Population genomics; Yeast

Indexed keywords

CYSTEINE; GLYCINE;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; FUNGAL GENOME; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS ISOLATION; GC RICH SEQUENCE; GENE CONVERSION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; INTROGRESSION; LACHANCEA KLUYVERI; LAST COMMON ANCESTOR; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NATURAL POPULATION; NONHUMAN; POPULATION GENETICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; YEAST; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; MUTATION RATE; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES; SACCHAROMYCES;

LACHANCEA; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KLUYVERI;

CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOMICS; MUTATION RATE; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SACCHAROMYCES;

EID: 84922373440     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu295     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. 2012. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491: 56-65.
2. Almeida P, Gonçalves C, Teixeira S, Libkind D, Bontrager M, Masneuf-Pomarede I, Albertin W, Durrens P, Sherman DJ, Marullo P, et al. 2014. A Gondwanan imprint on global diversity and domestication of wine and cider yeast Saccharomyces uvarum. Nat Commun. 5: 4044.
3. Andersen EC, Gerke JP, Shapiro JA, Crissman JR, Ghosh R, et al. 2012. Chromosome-scale selective sweeps shape Caenorhabditis elegans genomic diversity. Nat Genet. 44: 285-290.
4. Baack EJ, Rieseberg LH. 2007. A genomic view of introgression and hybrid speciation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 17: 513-518.
5. Boyle EI, Weng S, Gollub J, Jin H, Botstein D, et al. 2004. GO: : TermFinderopen source software for accessing Gene Ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes. Bioinformatics 20: 3710-3715.
6. Cao J, Schneeberger K, Ossowski S, Günther T, Bender S, et al. 2011. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations. Nat Genet. 43: 956-963.
7. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 17: 540-552.
8. Cherry JM, Ball C, Weng S, Juvik G, Schmidt R, et al. 1997. Genetic and physical maps of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 387: 67-73.
9. Cromie GA, Hyma KE, Ludlow CL, Garmendia-Torres C, Gilbert TL, et al. 2013. Genomic sequence diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae assessed by RAD-seq. G3 (Bethesda) 3: 2163-2171.
10. Darriba DA, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9: 772.
11. Drillon G, Carbone A, Fischer G. 2014. SynChro: A fast and easy tool to reconstruct and visualize synteny blocks along eukaryotic chromosomes. PLoS One 9: e92621.
12. Dujon B. 2010. Yeast evolutionary genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 11: 512-524.
13. Duret L, Galtier N. 2009. Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 10: 285-311.
14. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: A multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 113.
15. Fay JC, Benavides JA. 2005. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 1: e5.
16. Fearnhead P. 2006. SequenceLDhot: detecting recombination hotspots. Bioinformatics 22: 3061-3066.
17. Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 52: 696-704.
18. Hittinger CT, Gonçalves P, Sampaio JP, Dover J, Johnston M, Rokas A. 2010. Remarkably ancient balanced polymorphisms in a multi-locus gene network. Nature 464: 54-58.
19. Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 23: 254-267.
20. Hutter S, Vilella AJ, Rozas J. 2006. Genome-wide DNA polymorphism analyses using VariScan. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 409.
21. Jung PP, Fridedrich A, Reisser C, Hou J, Schacherer J. 2012. Mitochondrial genome evolution in a single protoploid species. G3 (Bethesda) 2: 1113-1127.
22. Lesecque Y, Mouchiroud D, Duret L. 2013. GC-biased gene conversion in yeast is specifically associated with crossovers: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary significance. Mol Biol Evol. 30: 1409-1419.
23. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754-1760.
24. Li H, et al. 2009. The sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078-2079.
25. Liti G, Carter DM,Moses AM,Warringer J, Parts L, et al. 2009. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458: 337-341.
26. Liti G, Schacherer J. 2011. The rise of yeast population genomics. C R Biol. 334: 612-619.
27. Lynch M. 2007. The origins of genome architecture. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates Inc.
28. LynchM, SungW,Morris K, Coffey N, Landry CR, et al. 2008. A genomewide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105: 9272-9277.
29. McCullough J, Herskowitz I. 1979. Mating pheromones of Saccharomyces kluyveri: pheromone interactions between Saccharomyces kluyveri and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 138: 146-154.
30. McVean GA, Myers SR, Hunt S, Deloukas P, Bentley DR, et al. 2004. The fine-scale structure of recombination rate variation in the human genome. Science 304: 581-584.
31. Morales L, Dujon B. 2012. Evolutionary role of interspecies hybridization and genetic exchanges in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76: 721-739.
32. Payen C, Fischer G, Marck C, Proux C, Sherman DJ, et al. 2009. Unusual composition of a yeast chromosome arm is associated with its delayed replication. Genome Res. 19: 1710-1721.
33. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
34. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, et al. 2007. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and populationbased linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 81: 559-575.
35. Ruderfer DM, Pratt SC, Seidel HS, Kruglyak L. 2006. Population genomic analysis of outcrossing and recombination in yeast. Nat Genet. 38: 1077-1081.
36. Schacherer J, Shapiro J, Ruderfer DM, Kruglyak L. 2009. Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 458: 342-345.
37. Skelly DA, Merrihew GE, Riffle M, Connelly CF, Kerr EO, et al. 2013. Integrative phenomics reveals insight into the structure of phenotypic diversity in budding yeast. Genome Res. 9: 1496-1504.
38. Souciet JL, Dujon B, Gaillardin C, Johnston M, Baret PV, et al. 2009. Comparative genomics of protoploid Saccharomycetaceae. Genome Res. 19: 1696-1709.
39. Sueoka N. 1995. Intrastrand parity rules of DNA base composition and usage biases of synonymous codons. J Mol Evol. 40: 318-325.
40. Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
41. Tsai IJ, Bensasson D, Burt A, Koufopanou V. 2008. Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: quantifying the life cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105: 4957-4962.
42. Wang QM, Liu WQ, Liti G, Wang SA, Bai FY. 2012. Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Mol Ecol 21: 5404-5417.
43. Wolfe KH, Shields DC. 1997. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387: 708-713.
44. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 24: 1586-1591