Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire: How Fact-Checking Influences Citizens’ Reactions to Negative Advertising

Political Communication

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 127-151

  Fridkin, Kim ^a   Kenney, Patrick J ^a   Wintersieck, Amanda ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

campaigns; elections; fact checking; negative campaigning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922327904     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2014.914613     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adair, B. (2012, November 8). The value of fact checking in the 2012 campaign. Tampa Bay Times: Politifact. Retrieved from http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/nov/08/value-fact-checking-2012-campaign/
2. Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1996). Can the press monitor campaign advertising? Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1, 72–86.
3. Bank, J. (2007, November 9). Newspaper adwatch stories: Coming back strong. Results of an analysis of newspaper adwatch stories. The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/downloads/political_communication/factcheck/20071109_factcheckingjournalism/20071109_fcj_Newspaper_Report.pdf
4. Berinsky, A. (2012). Rumors, truths, and reality: A study of political misinformation (Unpublished manuscript). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
5. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14, 63–82.
6. Brooks, D. J., & Geer, J. G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 1–16.
7. Carr, D. (2012, November 6). A last fact check: It didn’t work. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/06/a-last-factcheck-it-didnt-work/
8. Chaiken, S. (1986). Physical appearance and social influence. In C. P. Herman, M. P. Zanna, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Physical appearance, stigma, and social behavior: The Ontario Symposium (vol. 3, pp. 143–177). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Converse, P. E. (2006). The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–74.
10. Corn, D. (2012, September/October). How to beat the fact checkers. Politicians have figured it out: When caught in a lie, attack the truth cops. Mother Jones. Retrieved from http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/factcheck-politifact-lying-politicians
11. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1998). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven. CT: Yale University Press.
12. Eagly, A. H., Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
13. Fowler, E. F., & Ridout, T. N. (2010). Advertising trends in 2010. The Forum, 8(4), Article 4.
14. FlackCheck.org. (2012). The public still has a lot to learn about the 2012 presidential race but those who seek out fact checking on the Internet know more. Retrieved from http://www.flackcheck.org/press/the-public-still-has-a-lot-to-learn-about-the-2012-presidential-race-but-those-who-seek-out-factchecking-on-the-Internet-know-more/
15. Franz, M. M., & Ridout, T. N. (2010). Political advertising and persuasion in the 2004 and 2008 presidential elections. American Politics Research, 38(2), 303–329.
16. Fridkin, K., & Kenney, P. (2011). Variability in citizens’ reactions to negative campaigning. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 307–325.
17. Friedrich, R. J. (1982). In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 797–833.
18. Geer, J. G. (2006). In defense of negativity: Attack ads in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
19. Geer, J. G. (2012). The news media and the rise of negativity in presidential campaigns. PS: Political Science and Politics, 45(3), 422–427.
20. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (1999). The spectacle of U.S. Senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Keith, T. (2012, November 1). In key Senate races, outside groups outpace candidates’ ad spending. It’s All Politics: Political News from NPR. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/11/01/164120931/in-key-senate-races-outside-groups-outpace-candidates-ad-spending
23. Kessler, G. (2012, November 4). The biggest Pinocchios of election 2012. The Washington Post: The Fact Checker. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/factchecker/post/the-biggest-pinocchios-of-election-2012/2012/11/02/ad6e0bb4-2534-11e2-9313-3c7f59038d93_blog.html
24. Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790–816.
25. Ladd, J. M. (2011). Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Lau, R. (1982). Negativity in person perception. Political Behavior, 4, 353–377.
27. Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–482.
28. McGraw, K. M., Lodge, M., & Stroh, P. (1990). On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue importance, and sophistication. Political Behavior, 12(1), 41–58.
29. McGuire, W. J. (1968). Personality and susceptibility to social influence. Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, 2, 1130–1187.
30. McGuire, W. J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Anderson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 136–314). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31. McGuire, W. J. (1972). Attitude change: The information-processing paradigm. Experimental Social Psychology, 108–141.
32. Mill, J. S. (2010). On Liberty. In S. Collini (Ed.), On liberty and other writings (7th ed., pp. 3–96). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33. Min, Y. (2002). Intertwining of campaign news and advertising: The content and electoral effects of newspaper ad watches. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(4), 927–944.
34. Mondak, J. J. (2000). Reconsidering the measurement of political knowledge. Political Analysis, 8, 57–82.
35. Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15.
36. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330.
37. Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Ubel, P. A. (2013). The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform. Medical Care, 51(2), 127–132.
38. O’Keefe, D. J. (2008). Elaboration likelihood model. International Encyclopedia of Communication, 4, 1475–1480.
39. OpenSecrets.org. (2012). 2012 Overview: Most expensive races. Center for Responsive Politics. Retrieved from http://www.opensecrets.org/overview/topraces.php?cycle=2012&display=currcandsout
40. O’Sullivan, P. B., & Geiger, S. (1995). Does the watchdog bite? Newspaper truthboxes and political attack ads. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 771–785.
41. Papper, B. (2007, November 9). TV adwatch stories: On the rise. Results of a survey of TV news directors. The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/downloads/political_communication/factcheck/20071109_factcheckingjournalism/20071109_fcj_TV_Survey_Report.pdf
42. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847–855.
43. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Haugtvedt, C. P. (1992). Involvement and persuasion: An appreciative look at the Sherifs’ contribution to the study of self-relevance and attitude change. In D. Granberg & G. Sarup (Eds.), Social judgment and intergroup relations: Essays in honor of Muzafer Sherif (pp. 147–174). New York, NY: Springer/Verlag.
44. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 1, pp. 323–390). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
45. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2012, January 23). Public priorities: Deficit rising, terrorism slipping. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2012/01/23/about-the-survey-55/
46. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2012, August 2). Romney’s personal image remains negative. Retrived from http://www.people-press.org/2012/08/02/romneys-personal-image-remains-negative/2/
47. Pfau, M., & Louden, A. (1994). Effectiveness of adwatch formats in deflecting political attack ads. Communication Research, 21(3), 325–341.
48. Sides, J., & Citrin, J. (2007, April). How large the huddled masses? The causes and consequences of public misperceptions about immigrant populations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
49. Taber, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.
50. Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 67.
51. U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 census summary file 1. Retrived from http://www.census.gov/2010census/news/press-kits/summary-file-1.html
52. West, D. M. (2010). Air wars: Television advertising in election campaigns, 1952–2008 (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
53. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.