A mathematical model for post-disaster road restoration: Enabling accessibility and evacuation

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Volumn 61, Issue , 2014, Pages 56-67

  Tuzun Aksu, Dilek ^a   Ozdamar, Linet ^a  

^a YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Network accessibility; Post disaster relief and recovery; Resource constraints; Road restoration; Scheduling

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEM RECOVERY; DISASTER PREVENTION; EMERGENCY SERVICES; HIGHWAY PLANNING; ROADS AND STREETS;

DISASTER RECOVERY; DISASTER RELIEF; DISASTER-RESPONSE; NETWORK ACCESSIBILITY; POST DISASTERS; POST-DISASTER RELIEF AND RECOVERY; PRIMARY OBJECTIVE; RESOURCE CONSTRAINT; ROAD RESTORATION; SCHEDULING;

RESTORATION;

ACCESSIBILITY; ALGORITHM; NETWORK ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; ROAD TRANSPORT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

ISTANBUL [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 84888373195     PISSN: 13665545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Berdica K. An introduction to network vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done. Transport Policy 2002, 9:117-127.
2. Chang S.E., Nojima N. Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2001, 35(6):475-494.
3. Chen Y.W., Tzeng G.H. A fuzzy multi-objective model for reconstructing the post-quake road-network by genetic algorithm. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 1999, 1(2):85-95.
4. Chen Y., Tzeng G. Determining the optimal reconstruction priority of a post-quake road network. Computing in Civil and Building Engineering 2000, 686-693.
5. Chen A., Yang C., Kongsomsaksakul S., Lee M. Network based accessibility measures for vulnerability analysis of degradable transportation networks. Networks and Spatial Economics 2007, 7:241-256.
6. Cho S., Gordon P., Moore J.E., Richardson H.W., Shinozuka M., Chang S. Integrating transportation network and regional economic models to estimate the costs of a large urban earthquake. Journal of Regional Science 2001, 41:39-65.
7. Erath A., Birdsail J., Axhausen K.W., Hajdin R. Vulnerability assessment methodology for Swiss road network. Transportation Research Record 2010, 2137:118-126.
8. FEMA Public Assistance: Debris Management Guide 2007, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
9. Feng C.M., Wang T.C. Highway emergency rehabilitation scheduling in post-earthquake 72hours. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 2003, 5:3276-3285.
10. Giovinazzi S., Nicholson A. Transport Network Reliability in Seismic Risk Analysis and Management 2010, Civil and Natural Resources Engineering Dept., Canterbury University, New Zealand.
11. Ham H., Kim T.J., Boyce D.E. Assessment of economic impacts from unexpected events with an interregional commodity flow and multimodal transportation network model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2005, 39:849-860.
12. Jenelius E., Mattsson L.-G. Network vulnerability analysis of area covering disruptions: a grid based approach with case study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2012, 46:746-760.
13. Kim T.J., Ham H., Boyce D.E. Economic impacts of transportation network changes: implementation of combined transportation network and input-output model. Papers in Regional Science 2002, 81:223-246.
14. Liberatore F., Ortuño M.T., Tirado G., Vitoriano B., Scaparra M.P. A hierarchical compromise model for the joint optimization of recovery operations and distribution of emergency goods in Humanitarian Logistics. Computers & Operations Research 2012, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2012.03.019.
15. Matisziw T.C., Murray A.T. Modeling s-t path availability to support disaster vulnerability assessment of network infrastructure. Computers & Operations Research 2009, 36(1):16-26.
16. Maya Duque, Sörensen P. A GRASP metaheuristic to improve accessibility after a disaster. OR Spectrum 2011, 33(3):525-542.
17. Murray A.T., Matisziw T.C., Grubesic T.H. Critical network infrastructure analysis: interdiction and system flow. Journal of Geographical Systems 2007, 9(2):103-117.
18. Nolz P.C., Semet F., Doerner K.F. Risk approaches for delivering disaster relief supplies. OR Spectrum 2011, 33(3):543-569.
19. Sohn J. Evaluating the significance of highway network links under flood damage: an accessibility approach. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40:491-506.
20. Yan S., Shih Y.L. Optimal scheduling of emergency roadway repair and subsequent relief distribution. Computers & Operations Research 2009, 36(6):2049-2065.
21. Yan S., Shih Y.L. An ant colony system-based hybrid algorithm for an emergency roadway repair time-space network flow problem. Transportmetrica 2012, 8(5):361-386.