Digital impressions for fabrication of definitive "All-on-Four" restorations

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 125-129

  Gherlone, Enrico Felice ^a   Ferrini, Francesco ^b   Crespi, Roberto ^c   Gastaldi, Giorgio ^d   Capparé, Paolo ^a  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital ^*  (Italy)

^c SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

all on four; digital impression; tilted implants

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

ADULT; AGED; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH, EDENTULOUS; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH, EDENTULOUS; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC;

EID: 84922218871     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000206     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Johnson GH, Craig RG. Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53: 484-490
2. Millstein PL. Determining the accuracy of gypsum casts made from type IV dental stone. J Oral Rehabil. 1992; 19: 239-243
3. Sahin S, Cehreli M, Yalcin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prosthesesdA review. J Dent. 2002; 30: 271-282
4. Wang T, Leu L, Wang J, et al. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: A numeric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2002; 17: 231-237
5. Sones AD. Complications with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62: 581-585
6. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: Deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140: 1301-1304
7. Henkel GL A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007; 28: 422-431
8. Kurbad A. Impression-free production techniques. Int J Comput Dent. 2011; 14: 59-66
9. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, et al. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: Clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16: 26-35
10. Karl M, Rosch S, Graef F, et al. Strain situation after fixation of 3-unit ceramic veneered implant superstructures. Implant Dent. 2005; 14: 157-165
11. Del'Acqua MA, Arioli-Filho JN, Compagnoni MA, et al. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23: 226-236
12. Lin WS, Harris BT, Morton D. The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 187-191
13. Joda T, Wittneben JG, Bragger U. Digital implant impressions with the "Individualized Scanbody Technique" (IST) for emergence profile support. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013. doi: 10.1111/clr.12099
14. Lin WS, Harris BT, Morton D. Use of implant-supported interim restorations to transfer periimplant soft tissue profiles to a milled polyurethane definitive cast. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 333-337
15. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, et al. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent. 2010; 38: 553-559
16. McDonnell T, Houston F, et al. The effect of time lapse on the accuracy of two acrylic resins used to assemble an implant framework for soldering. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91: 538-540
17. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: Efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 111-115
18. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: Conventional versus digital impressions an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent. 2011; 14: 11-21
19. Maintz JB, Viergever MA A survey of medical image registration. Med Image Anal. 1998; 2: 1-36