Appropriateness, acceptance and sensory preferences based on visual information: A web-based survey on meat substitutes in a meal context

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 42, Issue , 2015, Pages 56-65

  Elzerman, Johanna E ^a   Hoek, Annet C ^a,b   van Boekel, Martinus J A S ^a   Luning, Pieternel A ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Sense2action ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

Appropriateness; Consumer acceptance; Dish; Internet survey; Meal context; Meat substitutes; New product development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922161464     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aiking H. Sustainable protein production and consumption: Pigs or Peas? 2006, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
2. Aiking H. Future protein supply. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2011, 22:112-120.
3. Aurelia Vleesvervangers in Nederland 2002 2002, Aurelia, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
4. Broekema, R., & Smale, E. (2011). Nulmeting Peulvruchten. Inzicht in milieueffecten en gezondheidsaspecten van peulvruchten, retrieved on 2014-12-12. http://www.productschapakkerbouw.nl/files/Rapport%20Nulmeting%20Peulvruchten%20D1%204.pdf.
5. Cardello A.V., Schutz H.G. Food appropriateness measures as an adjunct to consumer preference/acceptability ratings. Food Quality and Preference 1996, 7(3/4):239-249.
6. Cardello A.V., Schutz H.G., Snow C., Lesher L. Predictors of food acceptance, consumption and satisfaction in specific eating situations. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:201-216.
7. Courtine R.J. Larousse gastronomique 1984, Librarie Larousse, Paris, France.
8. de Bakker, E., & Dagevos, H. (2010). Vleesminnaars, vleesminderaars en vleesmijders: Duurzame eiwitconsumptie in een carnivore eetcultuur. Wageningen University LEI-Report, Den Haag, The Netherlands, retrieved on 2014-12-1. http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/rapporten/2010/07/01/rapport-vleesminnaars-vleesminderaars-en-vleesmijders.html.
9. Elzerman J.E., Hoek A.C., van Boekel M.A.J.S., Luning P.A. Consumer acceptance and appropriateness of meat substitutes in a meal context. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22(3):233-240.
10. Elzerman J.E., van Boekel M.A.J.S., Luning P.A. Exploring meat substitutes: Consumer experiences and contextual factors. British Food Journal 2013, 115(5):700-710.
11. Fischler C. Food, self, and identity. Social Science Information 1988, 27:275-292.
12. Grunert K.G. What's in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perception of beef. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8(3):157-174.
13. Hoek A.C., Elzerman J.E., Hageman R., Kok F.J., Luning P.A., de Graaf C. Are meat substitutes liked better over time? A repeated in-home use test with meat substitutes or meat in meals. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28(1):253-263.
14. Hoek A.C., van Boekel M.A.J.S., Voordouw J., Luning P.A. Identification of new food alternatives: How do consumers categorize meat and meat substitutes?. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22(4):371-383.
15. Hurling R., Shepherd R. Eating with your eyes: Effect of appearance on expectations of liking. Appetite 2003, 41(2):167-174.
16. Jobse-van Putten J. Eenvoudig maar voedzaam. Cultuurgeschiedenis van de dagelijkse maaltijd in Nederland 1996, Sun B.V., Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
17. King S.C., Meiselman H.L., Hottenstein A.W., Work T.M., Cronk V. The effects of contextual variables on food acceptability: Confirmatory study. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:58-65.
18. King S.C., Weber A.J., Meiselman H.L., Nan L. The effect of meal situation physical environment and choice on food acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:645-653.
19. Klunder H.C., Wolkers-Rooijackers J., Korpela J.M., Nout M.J.R. Microbiological aspects of processing and storage of edible insects. Food Control 2012, 26(2):628-631.
20. Meiselman H.L. The future in consumer/sensory research: Evolving to a better science. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 27(2):208-214.
21. Michaut, A.M.K. (2004). Consumer acceptance of new products with application to foods (Ph.D. thesis). The Netherlands, Wageningen University.
22. Pliner P., Hobden K. Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite 1992, 19:105-120.
23. Pliner P., Salvy S. Food neophobia in humans. The psychology of food choice 2006, 75-92. CABI, Oxfordshire (UK). R. Shepherd, M. Raats (Eds.).
24. Resurreccion A.V.A. Sensory aspects of consumer choices for meat and meat products. Meat Science 2003, 66:11-20.
25. Rumpold B.A., Schlüter O.K. Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 2013, 17:1-11.
26. Sadler M.J. Meat alternatives - Market developments and health benefits. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2004, 15(5):250-260.
27. Schösler H., de Boer J., Boersema J.J. Can we cut out meat of the meal? Constructing consumer-oriented pathways towards meat substitution. Appetite 2012, 58(1):39-47.
28. Shurtleff, W., and Aoyagi, A. Chronology of tofu worldwide. Soyinfocenter.com. Retrieved on 2014-12-12.
29. Smil V. Worldwide transformation of diets, burdens of meat production and opportunities for novel food proteins. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2002, 30(3):305-311.
30. Stallberg-White C., Pliner P. The effect of flavor principles on willingness to taste novel foods. Appetite 1999, 33(2):209-221.
31. Statistics Netherlands (2014). Web page: Retrieved on 2014-12-12. http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/bevolking/cijfers/extra/piramide-fx.htm.
32. Tuorila H., Lähteenmäki L., Pohjalainen L., Lotti L. Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:29-37.
33. Tuorila H., Meiselman H.L., Bell R., Cardello A.V., Johnson W. Role of sensory and cognitive information in the enhancement of certainty and liking for novel and familiar foods. Appetite 1994, 23:231-246.
34. Tuorila H.M., Meiselman H.L., Cardello A.V., Lesher L.L. Effect of expectations and the definition of product category on the acceptance of unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9(6):421-430.
35. van Trijp H.C.M., van Kleef E. Newness, value and new product performance. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2008, 19:562-573.
36. Vinnari M., Tapio P. Future images of meat consumption in 2030. Futures 2009, 41(5):269-278.
37. Wansink B. Changing eating habits on the home front: Lost lessons from World War II research. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 2002, 21(1):90-99.
38. Wansink B., Park S.B., Sonka S., Morganosky M. How soy labeling influences preference and taste. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2000, 3(1):85-94.