CNRS - TELECOM ParisTech at ImageCLEF 2013 scalable concept image annotation task: Winning annotations with context dependent SVMs

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 1179, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Sahbi, Hichem ^a  

^a TELECOM PARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

Context dependent kernels; Image annotation; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS; WEBSITES;

CONTEXT DEPENDENT; CONTEXT DEPENDENT KERNELS; CONTEXTUAL CUE; IMAGE ANNOTATION; IMAGE COLLECTIONS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; TRAINING SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; VISUAL FEATURE;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84922031804     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. C. Bahlmann, B. Haasdonk, and H. Burkhardt. On-line handwriting recognition with support vector machines, a kernel approach. IWFHR, pages 49-54, 2002.
2. K. Barnard, P.Duygululu, D. Forsyth, D. Blei, and M. Jordan. Matching words and pictures. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003.
3. S. Boughorbel, J. Tarel, and N. Boujemaa. The intermediate matching kernel for image local features. IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005.
4. L. Cao, J. Luo, and T. Huang. Annotating photo collection by label propagation according to multiple similarity cues. ACM Multimedia, 2008.
5. G. Carneiro and N. Vasconcelos. Formulating semantic image annotation as a supervised learning problem. In. Proc. of CVPR, 2005.
6. M. Cuturi. Fast global alignment kernels. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 2011.
7. M. Davis, S. King, N. Good, and R. Sarvas. From context to content. leveraging context to infer media metadata. In. Proceedings of 12th Annual ACM Interna-tional Conference on Multimedia, MM 2004, Brave New Topics Session on From Context to Content. Leveraging Contextual Metadata to infer Multimedia Content in New York, ACM Press, 188-195, 2004.
8. P. Duygulu, K. Barnard, J. deFreitas, and D. Forsyth. Object recognition as machine translation. Learning a lexicon for a fixed image vocabulary. In. Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., Johansen, P. (eds.) ECCV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2353, pp. 97-112. Springer, Heidelberg, 2002.
9. A. Gallagher, C. Neustaedter, L. Cao, J. Luo, and T. Chen. Image annotation using personal calendars as context. ACM Multimedia, 2008.
10. Y. Gao, J. Fan, X. Xue, and R. Jain. Automatic image annotation by incorporat-ing feature hierarchy and boosting to scale up svm classié rs. in Proc. of ACM MULTIMEDIA, 2006.
11. Y. Gao, M. Wang, Z.-J. Zha, J. Shen, X. Li, and X. Wu. Visual-textual joint rele-vance learning for tag-based social image search. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 22, 2013.
12. T. Gartner. A survey of kernels for structured data. Multi Relational Data Mining, 5(1): 49-58, 2003.
13. K. Grauman and T. Darrell. The pyramid match kernel. Efficient learning with sets of features. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), 8: 725-760, 2007.
14. X. He, R. Zimel, and M. Carreira. Multiscale conditional random é lds for image labeling. In CVPR, 2004.
15. D. Joshi, A. Gallagher, J. Yu, and J. Luo. Inferring photographic location using geotagged web images. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 56(1): 131-153, 2012.
16. R. Kondor and T. Jebara. A kernel between sets of vectors. In proceedings of the 20th International conference on Machine Learning, 2003.
17. J. Li and J. Z. Wang. Automatic linguistic indexing of pictures by a statistical modeling approach. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 25(9): 1075-1088, 2003.
18. X. Li, C. Snoek, and M. Worring. Learning tag relevance by neighbor voting for social image retrieval. In MIR conference, 2008.
19. Y. Liu, D. Xu, I.-H. Tsang, and J. Luo. Textual query of personal photos facili-tated by large-scale web data. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 33(5): 1022-1036, 2011.
20. S. Lyu. Mercer kernels for object recognition with local features. In the proceedings of the IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005.
21. F. Monay and D. GaticaPerez. Plsa-based image autoannotation. Constraining the latent space. in Proc. of ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2004.
22. P. Moreno, P. Ho, and N. Vasconcelos. A kullback-leibler divergence based kernel for svm classfication in multimedia applications. In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2003.
23. G. Moser and B. Serpico. Combining support vector machines and markov random é lds in an integrated framework for contextual image classification. In TGRS, 2012.
24. S. Nowak and M. Huiskes. New strategies for image annotation. Overview of the photo annotation task at imageclef 2010. in The Working Notes of CLEF 2010, 2010.
25. J. Qiu, M. Hue, A. Ben-Hur, J.-P. Vert, and W. S. Noble. A structural alignment kernel for protein structures. Bioinformatics, 23(9): 1090-1098, 2007.
26. D. Ritendra, D. Joshi, J. Li, and J. Wang. Image retrieval. Ideas, inuences, and trends of the new age. ACM Computing Surveys, 2008.
27. H. Sahbi. Explicit context-Aware kernel map learning for image annotation. The 9th International Conference on Computer Vision systems, 2013.
28. H. Sahbi, J.-Y. Audibert, and R. Keriven. Context-dependent kernels for object classification. In Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 4(33), 2011.
29. H. Sahbi, J.-Y. Audibert, J. Rabarisoa, and R. Keriven. Context-dependent kernel design for object matching and recognition. In the proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2008.
30. H. Sahbi and X. Li. Context based support vector machines for interconnected image annotation (the saburo tsuji best regular paper award). In the Asian Con-ference on Computer Vision (ACCV), 2010.
31. D. Semenovich and A. Sowmya. Geometry aware local kernels for object recogni-tion. In ACCV, 2010.
32. J. Shawe-Taylor and N. Cristianini. Support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
33. A. Singhal, L. Jiebo, and Z. Weiyu. Probabilistic spatial context models for scene content understanding. In CVPR, 2003.
34. Z. Stone, T. Zickler, and T. Darrell. Auto-tagging facebook. Social network context improves photo annotation. in IVW, 2008.
35. V. N. Vapnik. Statistical learning theory. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, 1998.
36. M. Villegas, R. Paredes, and B. Thomee. Overview of the imageclef 2013 scalable concept image annotation subtask. CLEF 2013 working notes, Valencia, Spain, 2013.
37. C. Wallraven, B. Caputo, and A. Graf. Recognition with local features. The kernel recipe. ICCV, pages 257-264, 2003.
38. L. Wu, X. Hua, N. Y. nd W. Ma, and S. Li. Flickr distance. In. Proc. of ACM MULTIMEDIA, 2008.
39. L. Yang, B. Geng, A. Hanjalic, and X.-S. Hua. A unified context model for web image retrieval. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP), 8(3): 28, 2012.
40. Y.-H. Yang, P-T.Wu, C.-W. Lee, K.-H. Lin, W. Hsu, and H. Chen. Contextseer. Context search and recommendation at query time for shared consumer photos. ACM Multimedia, 2008.
41. D. Zhou, J. Bian, S. Zheng, H. Zha, and C. Giles. Exploring social annotations for information retrieval. in the WWW conference, Beijing, China, 2008