The prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage with tissue adhesives in a contaminated environment is associated with the presence of anti-inflammatory macrophages

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1507-1516

  Wu, Zhouqiao ^a   Vakalopoulos, Konstantinos A ^a   Boersema, Geesien S A ^a   Kroese, Leonard F ^a   Lam, King H ^a   van der Horst, Paul H ^a   Mulder, Irene M ^a   M Bastiaansen Jenniskens, Yvonne ^a   Kleinrensink, Gert Jan ^a   Jeekel, Johannes ^a   Lange, Johan F ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Anastomotic leakage; Animal model; Contaminated surgery; Macrophages; Tissue adhesive

Indexed keywords

ENBUCRILATE; FIBRIN GLUE; SURGICAL GLUE; TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ABSCESS; ADHESION; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASCITES; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; CD4 CD8 RATIO; CELL INFILTRATION; COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENTEROCOCCUS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FOLLOW UP; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INFLAMMATORY CELL; MACROPHAGE; MALE; NONHUMAN; PERITONITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEUS; RAT; SEPTICEMIA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; T LYMPHOCYTE; WOUND HEALING; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; ANIMAL; BACTERIAL INFECTION; COLON; COMPLICATION; DRUG EFFECTS; IMMUNOLOGY; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; RECTUM; SURGERY; WISTAR RAT;

ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL INFECTIONS; COLON; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MACROPHAGES; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; PERITONITIS; RATS, WISTAR; RECTUM; TISSUE ADHESIVES; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84921936410     PISSN: 01791958     EISSN: 14321262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-014-2012-x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Demetriades D, Murray JA, Chan L et al (2001) Penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: diversion or primary anastomosis? An AAST prospective multicenter study. J Trauma 50(5):765–75
2. Nelson R, Singer M (2003) Primary repair for penetrating colon injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3, CD002247
3. Constantinides VA, Heriot A, Remzi F et al (2007) Operative strategies for diverticular peritonitis: a decision analysis between primary resection and anastomosis versus Hartmann’s procedures. Ann Surg 245(1):94–103
4. Kamwendo NY, Modiba MC, Matlala NS, Becker PJ (2002) Randomized clinical trial to determine if delay from time of penetrating colonic injury precludes primary repair. Br J Surg 89(8):993–8
5. Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T et al (2006) Primary resection with anastomosis vs. Hartmann’s procedure in nonelective surgery for acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 49(7):966–81
6. Hudolin T, Hudolin I (2005) The role of primary repair for colonic injuries in wartime. Br J Surg 92(5):643–7
7. Golub R, Golub RW, Cantu R Jr, Stein HD (1997) A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. J Am Coll Surg 184(4):364–72
8. Tang R, Chen HH, Wang YL et al (2001) Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234(2):181–9
9. Leichtle SW, Mouawad NJ, Welch KB, Lampman RM, Cleary RK (2012) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 55(5):569–75
10. Salem L, Flum DR (2004) Primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 47(11):1953–64
11. Snijders HS, Wouters MW, van Leersum NJ et al (2012) Meta-analysis of the risk for anastomotic leakage, the postoperative mortality caused by leakage in relation to the overall postoperative mortality. Eur J Surg Oncol 38(11):1013–9
12. Ahrendt GM, Tantry US, Barbul A (1996) Intra-abdominal sepsis impairs colonic reparative collagen synthesis. Am J Surg 171(1):102–7, discussion 7–8
13. Thornton FJ, Ahrendt GM, Schaffer MR, Tantry US, Barbul A (1997) Sepsis impairs anastomotic collagen gene expression and synthesis: a possible role for nitric oxide. J Surg Res 69(1):81–6
14. Schaffer M, Barbul A (1998) Lymphocyte function in wound healing and following injury. Br J Surg 85(4):444–60
15. Paral J, Subrt Z, Lochman P et al (2011) Suture-free anastomosis of the colon experimental comparison of two cyanoacrylate adhesives. J Gastrointest Surg 15(3):451–9
16. Silecchia G, Boru CE, Mouiel J et al (2008) The use of fibrin sealant to prevent major complications following laparoscopic gastric bypass: results of a multicenter, randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22(11):2492–7
17. Slieker JC, Vakalopoulos KA, Komen NA, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2013) Prevention of leakage by sealing colon anastomosis: experimental study in a mouse model. J Surg Res 184(2):819–24
18. Preul MC, Campbell PK, Garlick DS, Spetzler RF (2010) Application of a new hydrogel dural sealant that reduces epidural adhesion formation: evaluation in a large animal laminectomy model. J Neurosurg Spine 12(4):381–90
19. Vakalopoulos KA, Daams F, Wu Z, et al. Tissue adhesives in gastrointestinal anastomosis: a systematic review. J Surg Res. 2013 Jan 16.
20. Wu Z, Boersema GS, Vakalopoulos KA, et al. Critical analysis of cyanoacrylate in intestinal and colorectal anastomosis. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013 Oct 24.
21. Deerenberg EB, Mulder IM, Ditzel M et al (2012) Polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel decreases formation of adhesions in a rat model of peritonitis. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 13(5):321–5
22. Deerenberg EB, Mulder IM, Grotenhuis N, Ditzel M, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2012) Experimental study on synthetic and biological mesh implantation in a contaminated environment. Br J Surg 99(12):1734–41
23. Zuhlke HV, Lorenz EM, Straub EM, Savvas V. Pathophysiology and classification of adhesions. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir. 1990:1009–16.
24. Phillips JD, Kim CS, Fonkalsrud EW, Zeng H, Dindar H (1992) Effects of chronic corticosteroids and vitamin A on the healing of intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg 163(1):71–7
25. Hendriks T, Mastboom WJ (1990) Healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses parameters for repair. Dis Colon Rectum 33(10):891–901
26. de Hingh IH, de Man BM, Lomme RM, van Goor H, Hendriks T (2003) Colonic anastomotic strength and matrix metalloproteinase activity in an experimental model of bacterial peritonitis. Br J Surg 90(8):981–8
27. Chawla A (2010) Control of macrophage activation and function by PPARs. Circ Res 106(10):1559–69
28. Dal Secco D, Paron JA, de Oliveira SH, Ferreira SH, Silva JS, Cunha FQ (2003) Neutrophil migration in inflammation: nitric oxide inhibits rolling, adhesion and induces apoptosis. Nitric Oxide 9(3):153–64
29. Vakalopoulos KA, Wu Z, Kroese L, et al. Mechanical strength and rheological properties of tissue adhesives with regard to colorectal anastomosis: an ex vivo study. Annals of surgery. 2014. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000599
30. Wu Z, Vakalopoulos KA, Kroese LF et al (2013) Reducing anastomotic leakage by reinforcement of colorectal anastomosis with cyanoacrylate glue. Eur Surg Res 50(3–4):255–61
31. Brasken P, Lehto M, Renvall S (1990) Fibronectin, laminin, and collagen types I, III, IV and V in the healing rat colon anastomosis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 79(2):65–71
32. Gratchev A, Guillot P, Hakiy N et al (2001) Alternatively activated macrophages differentially express fibronectin and its splice variants and the extracellular matrix protein betaIG-H3. Scand J Immunol 53(4):386–92
33. Brown BN, Londono R, Tottey S et al (2012) Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials. Acta Biomater 8(3):978–87
34. Kou PM, Babensee JE (2011) Macrophage and dendritic cell phenotypic diversity in the context of biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res A 96(1):239–60
35. Schneider DF, Palmer JL, Tulley JM et al (2011) A novel role for NKT cells in cutaneous wound repair. J Surg Res 168(2):325–33, e1
36. Tough DF, Sun S, Sprent J (1997) T cell stimulation in vivo by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). J Exp Med 185(12):2089–94
37. Park JE, Barbul A (2004) Understanding the role of immune regulation in wound healing. Am J Surg 187(5A):11S–6S
38. Postlethwaite AE, Holness MA, Katai H, Raghow R (1992) Human fibroblasts synthesize elevated levels of extracellular matrix proteins in response to interleukin 4. J Clin Invest 90(4):1479–85
39. Burleson DG, Mason AD Jr, Pruitt BA Jr (1988) Lymphoid subpopulation changes after thermal injury and thermal injury with infection in an experimental model. Ann Surg 207(2):208–12
40. van der Ham AC, Kort WJ, Weijma IM, Jeekel H (1993) Transient protection of incomplete colonic anastomoses with fibrin sealant: an experimental study in the rat. J Surg Res 55(3):256–60
41. van der Ham AC, Kort WJ, Weijma IM, van den Ingh HF, Jeekel H (1992) Effect of antibiotics in fibrin sealant on healing colonic anastomoses in the rat. Br J Surg 79(6):525–8
42. Mansson P, Zhang XW, Jeppsson B, Thorlacius H (2002) Anastomotic healing in the rat colon: comparison between a radiological method, breaking strength and bursting pressure. Int J Colorectal Dis 17(6):420–5
43. Bonanomi G, Prince JM, McSteen F, Schauer PR, Hamad GG (2004) Sealing effect of fibrin glue on the healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses: implications for the endoscopic treatment of leaks. Surg Endosc 18(11):1620–4
44. Kanellos I, Christoforidis E, Kanellos D, Pramateftakis MG, Sakkas L, Betsis D (2006) The healing of colon anastomosis covered with fibrin glue after early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Tech Coloproctol 10(2):115–20
45. Wang P, Wang J, Zhang W, Li Y, Li J (2009) Effect of the combination of fibrin glue and growth hormone on intestinal anastomoses in a pig model of traumatic shock associated with peritonitis. World J Surg 33(3):567–76
46. Kayaoglu HA, Ersoy OF, Ozkan N, Celik A, Filiz NO (2009) Effect of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate on high-risk colonic anastomoses. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 25(4):177–83
47. Nursal TZ, Anarat R, Bircan S, Yildirim S, Tarim A, Haberal M (2004) The effect of tissue adhesive, octyl-cyanoacrylate, on the healing of experimental high-risk and normal colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 187(1):28–32
48. Kirkegaard P, Christensen AB, Ibsen J (1980) Experimental nonsuture colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 139(2):233–6