ARBOOK: Development and Assessment of a Tool Based on Augmented Reality for Anatomy

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 119-124

  Ferrer Torregrosa, J ^a   Torralba, J ^a   Jimenez, M A ^a   Garcia S ^b   Barcia, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE VALENCIA SAN VICENTE MÁRTIR   (Spain)

^b Valencia Health Agency   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Augmented reality; Teaching supporting material; Three dimensional interpretation; Virtual imaging

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921922622     PISSN: 10590145     EISSN: 15731839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-014-9526-4     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Azuma R, Baillot Y, Behringer R et al (2001) Recent advances in augmented reality. Comput Graph Appl IEEE 21:34–47. doi:10.1109/38.963459
2. Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
3. Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentive perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 14:1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
4. Bryan RR, Glynn SM, Kittleson JM (2011) Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Sci Educ 14:1049–1063. doi:10.1002/sce.20462
5. Cabrilo I, Sarrafzadeh A, Bijlenga P, Landis BN, Schaller K (2014) Augmented reality-assisted skull base surgery. Neurochirurgie. doi:10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.07.001
6. Campos-Sánchez A, López-Núñez JA, Carriel V, Martín-Piedra MÁ, Sola T, Alaminos M (2014) Motivational component profiles in university students learning histology: a comparative study between genders and different health science curricula. BMC Med Educ 10(14):46. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-46
7. Cottam WW (1999) Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors. Clin Anat 12:55–65
8. Dalkey N, Helmer O (1963) An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci 9:458–467
9. Eccles JS, Wigfield A (2002) Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu Rev Psychol 14:109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
10. Garg A, Norman GR, Spero L, Maheshwari P (1999) Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? Acad Med 74:S87–S89
11. Garg AX, Norman G, Sperotable L (2001) How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Lancet 357:363–364
12. Garg AX, Norman GR, Eva KW et al (2002) Is there any real virtue of virtual reality? The minor role of multiple orientations in learning anatomy from computers. Acad Med 77:S97–S99
13. Glynn SM, Brickman P, Armstrong N, Taasoobshirazi G (2011) Science motivation questionnaire II: validation with science majors and nonscience majors. J Res Sci Teach 14:1159–1176. doi:10.1002/tea.20442
14. Gopal T, Herron SS, Mohn RS et al (2010) Effect of an interactive web-based instruction in the performance of undergraduate anatomy and physiology lab students. Comput Educ 55:500–512
15. Harman KL, Humphrey GK, Goodale MA (1999) Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition. Curr Biol 9:1315–1318
16. James KH, Humphrey GK, Goodale MA (2001) Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: where the action is. Can J Exp Psychol Can Psychol Exp 55:111–120
17. James KH, Humphrey GK, Vilis T et al (2002) “Active” and “passive” learning of three-dimensional object structure within an immersive virtual reality environment. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 34:383–390
18. Keehner M, Khooshabeh P, Hegarty M (2008) Individual differences among users: Implications for the design of 3D medical visualizations. User Centered Des Med Vis pp 1–24
19. Lamounier E, Bucioli A, Cardoso A et al (2010) On the use of Augmented Reality techniques in learning and interpretation of cardiologic data. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Conf 2010:610–613. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5628019
20. Luciano CJ, Banerjee PP, Bellotte B et al (2011) Learning retention of thoracic pedicle screw placement using a high-resolution augmented reality simulator with haptic feedback. Neurosurgery 69:ons14. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821954ed
21. Luursema J-M, Verwey WB, Kommers PA et al (2006) Optimizing conditions for computer-assisted anatomical learning. Interact Comput 18:1123–1138
22. McLachlan JC, Bligh J, Bradley P, Searle J (2004) Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med Educ 38:418–424
23. McNulty JA, Halama J, Espiritu B (2004) Evaluation of computer-aided instruction in the medical gross anatomy curriculum. Clin Anat N Y N 17:73–78
24. Nicholson DT, Chalk C, Funnell WRJ, Daniel SJ (2006) Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Med Educ 40:1081–1087
25. Okamoto T, Onda S, Yanaga K, Suzuki N, Hattori A (2014) Clinical application of navigation surgery using augmented reality in the abdominal field. Surg Today (in press)
26. Sakellariou S, Ward BM, Charissis V et al (2009) Design and Implementation of Augmented Reality Environment for Complex Anatomy Training: Inguinal Canal Case Study. Springer, San Diego, pp 605–614
27. Soler L, Nicolau S, Pessaux P, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2014) Real-time 3D image reconstruction guidance in liver resection surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 3(2):73–81. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.02.03
28. Stirling A, Birt J (2014) An enriched multimedia eBook application to facilitate learning of anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 7:19–27. doi:10.1002/ase.1373
29. Thomas RG, William John N, Delieu JM (2010) Augmented reality for anatomical education. J Vis Commun Med 33:6–15
30. Vernon T, Peckham D (2002) The benefits of 3D modelling and animation in medical teaching. J Vis Commun Med 25:142–148