Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 52, Issue , 2015, Pages 57-73

  Fagerholt, Kjetil ^a   Gausel, Nora T ^a   Rakke, Jørgen G ^b   Psaraftis, Harilaos N ^c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b SINTEF OCEAN   (Norway)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Emissions; Maritime transportation; Routing; Speed optimization

Indexed keywords

EMISSION CONTROL; FUELS; OPERATING COSTS; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; SHIPS; SULFUR; WATERWAY TRANSPORTATION;

COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES; MARITIME TRANSPORTATION; OPTIMIZATION MODELING; ROUTING; ROUTING DECISIONS; SHIPPING ROUTES; SPEED OPTIMIZATION; SULPHUR CONTENT;

SPEED;

CARBON EMISSION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FUEL CONSUMPTION; MARITIME TRANSPORTATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; SHIPPING;

EID: 84921915262     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Andersson H., Fagerholt K., Hobbesland K. Integrated maritime fleet deployment and speed optimization: case study from RoRo shipping. Comput. Oper. Res. 2015, 55:233-240.
2. Balland O., Erikstad S., Fagerholt K. Optimized selection of air emission controls for vessels. Marit. Policy Manage. 2012, 39(4):387-400.
3. Balland O., Erikstad S., Fagerholt K., Wallace S. Planning vessel air emission regulations compliance under uncertainty. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2013, 18(3):349-357.
4. Brynolf S., Magnusson M., Fridell E., Andersson K. Compliance possibilities for the future ECA regulations through the use of abatement technologies or change of fuels. Transportat. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2014, 28:6-18.
5. Cullinane K., Bergqvist R. Emission control areas and their impact on maritime transport. Transportat. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2014, 28:1-5.
6. Doudnikoff M., Lacoste R. Effect of a speed reduction of containerships in response to higher energy costs in sulphur emission control areas. Transportat. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2014, 27:19-29.
7. Hvattum L.M., Norstad I., Fagerholt K., Laporte G. Analysis of an exact algorithm for the vessel speed optimization problem. Networks 2013, 62(2):132-135.
8. IMO, 2014. International Maritime Organization Websites. (accessed 30.03.2014). http://www.imo.org/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Pages/Air-Pollution.aspx.
9. Jiang L., Kronbak J., Christensen L. The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil. Transportat. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2014, 28:19-27.
10. Norstad I., Fagerholt K., Laporte G. Tramp ship routing and scheduling with speed optimization. Transportat. Res. Part C: Emerging Technologies 2011, 19:853-865.
11. Panagakos G., Stamatopoulou I.V., Psaraftis H.N. The possible designation of the mediterranean as a SECA: a case study. Transportat. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2014, 28:74-90.
12. Psaraftis, H.N., Kontovas, C.A., 2009. Ship Emissions: Logistics and Other Tradeoffs. In: 10th International Marine Design Conference (IMDC), Trondheim, Norway, 26-29 May 2009.
13. Psaraftis H., Kontovas C. Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: a taxonomy and survey. Transportat. Res. Part C: Emerging Technologies 2013, 26:331-351.
14. Psaraftis H., Kontovas C. Ship speed optimization: concepts, models and combined speed-routing scenarios. Transportat. Res. Part C: Emerging Technologies 2014, 44:52-69.
15. Schinas O., Stefanakos C.N. Cost assessment of environmental regulation and options for marine operators. Transportat. Res. Part C: Emerging Technologies 2012, 25:81-99.
16. Wang S., Meng Q., Liu Z. Bunker consumption optimization methods in shipping: a critical review and extensions. Transportat. Res. Part E: Logist. Transportat. Rev. 2013, 53:49-62.
17. x emissions. Transportat. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2012, 17:478-486.