The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 28, Issue , 2014, Pages 19-27

  Jiang, Liping ^a   Kronbak, Jacob ^a   Christensen, Leise Pil ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Air pollution; Cost benefit analysis; Environmental externalities; Marine gas oil; Ship emission control; Sulphur scrubber

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; COST REDUCTION; COSTS; EMISSION CONTROL; GAS OILS; GASES; MARINE POLLUTION; POLLUTION CONTROL; SCRUBBERS; SHIPS; SULFUR;

COSTS AND BENEFITS; ECONOMIC COMPARISONS; EMISSION REDUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES; REDUCTION MEASURES; SHIP EMISSIONS; SULPHUR REDUCTION;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

ABATEMENT COST; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; SULFUR EMISSION;

EID: 84899055963     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ABS, 2010. Fuel Switching Advisory Notice, <>. http://www.eagle.org/eagleExternalPortalWEB/ShowProperty/BEA%20Repository/References/ABS%20Advisories/FuelSwitchingAdvisory.
2. Berechman J., Tseng P.H. Estimating the environmental costs of port related emissions: the case of Kaohsiung. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2012, 17(1):35-38.
3. Bickel P., Friedrich R. ExternE: Externalities of Energy. Methodology 2005 Update 2005, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
4. Bickel P., Friedrich R., Burgess A., Fagiani P., Hunt A., Jong G.D., Laird J., Lieb C., Lindberg G., Mackie P., Navrud S., Odgaard T., Ricci A., Shires J., Tavasszy L. HEATCO (Developing Harmonised European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment) Deliverable 5: Proposal for Harmonised Guidelines 2006, Institut für Energiewissenschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung, Stuttgart.
5. Black, I., Seton, R., Ricci, A., Enei, R., 2003. RECORDIT (Real cost reduction of door-to-door intermodal transport) Final report: Actions to promote intermodal transport.
6. Boardman A.E., Greenberg D.H., Vining A.R., Weimer D.L. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice 2006, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Third Edition.
7. Corbett J.J., Fischbeck P.S. Emissions from waterborne commerce vessels in United States continental and inland waterways. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34(15):3254-3260.
8. Denisis, A., 2009. An economic feasibility study of short sea shipping including the estimation of externalities with fuzzy logic. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan.
9. Endresen Ø., Sørgård E., Sundet J.K., Dalsøren S.B., Isaksen I.S.A., Berglen T.F., Gravir G. Emission from international sea transportation and environmental impact. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2003, 108(D17):1-22.
10. Entec, 2005a. European Commission Directorate General Environment service contract on ship emissions: Assignment, abatement and market-based instruments. Task 1-64, Preliminary assignment of ship emissions to European Countries. Final report. London: Entec UK Limited.
11. Entec, 2005b. European Commission Directorate General Environment service contract on ship emissions: Assignment, abatement and market-based instruments. Task 2c-SO2 Abatement. Final report. London: Entec UK Limited.
12. Essen H.P.V., Boon B.H., Maibach M., Schreyer C. Methodologies for External Cost Estimates and Internalisation Scenarios 2007, CE Delft, Delft.
13. Friedrich R., Bickel P. Environmental External Costs of Transport 2001, Springer, Berlin.
14. Germanischer Lloyd and MAN Costs and Benefits of LNG as Ship Fuel for Container Vessels 2012, Germanischer Lloyd, Hamburg.
15. Holland M., Watkiss P. Benefits Table Database: Estimates of the Marginal External Costs of Air Pollution in Europe 2002, NETCEN, Oxon.
16. Holland, M., Pye, S., Watkiss, P., Droste-Franke, B., Bickel, P., 2005. Service contract for carrying out cost-benefit analysis of air quality related issues, in particular in the Clean Air for Europe (CAFE) programme. Damages per tonne of PM2.5, NH3, SO2, NOx and VOC's of EU25 Member State (excluding Cyprus) and surrounding seas. Oxon: AEA Technology Environment.
17. IMO, 2008. Revised MARPOL Annex VI: Regulations for the prevention of air pollution from ships and NOx technical code London: IMO Marine Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC).
18. Jalkanen J.-P., Brink A., Kalli J., Pettersson H., Kukkonen J., Stipa T. A modelling system for the exhaust emissions of marine traffic and its application in the Baltic Sea area. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2009, 9(4):15339-15373.
19. Kalli J., Tapaninen U. Externalities of Shipping in the Gulf of Finland Until 2015 2008, Center for Maritime Studies, University of Turku, Turku.
20. Kristensen, H.O., 2012. Energy demand and exhaust gas emissions of ships. Work Package 2 of Project Emissionsbeslutningsstøttesystem. Copenhagen: Technical University of Denmark.
21. Maibach M., Schreyer C., Sutter D., Essen H.P.V., Boon B.H., Smokers R., Schrote A., Doll C., Pawlowska B., Bak M. Handbook on Estimation of External Costs in the Transport Sector 2008, CE Delft, Delft.
22. Miola, A., Paccagnan, V., Turvani, M., Andreoni, V., Massarutto, A., Perujo, A., 2008. Review of the measurement of external costs of transportation in theory and practice. Joint Research Center of European Commission and Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
23. Møllenbach C.K., Schack C., Eefsen T., Kat J.D. Vessel Emission Study: Comparison of Various Abatement Technologies to Meet Emission Levels for ECA's 2012, Green ship of the Future, Lyngby.
24. Nash C. UNITE (Unification of Accounts and Marginal Costs for Transport Efficiency) Final Report for Publication 2003, ITS, University of Leeds, Leeds.
25. Nash C., Matthews B., Link H., Bonsall P.W., Lindberg G., Voorde E.V.D., Ricci A., Enei R., Proost S. GRACE (Generalisation of Research on Accounts and Cost Estimation) Final Activity Report 2008, ITS, University of Leeds, Leeds.
26. Pindyck R.S., Rubinfeld D.L. Microeconomics 2008, Prentice Hall, London.
27. Saxe H., Larsen T. Air pollution from ships in three Danish ports. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38(24):4057-4067.
28. Schmid, S.A., Bickel, P. Friedrich, R., 2001. RECORDIT Deliverable 4: External cost calculation for selected corridors. Stuttgart: Institute of Energy Economics and the Rational Use of Energy, University of Stuttgart.
29. Sieber, N., 2008. Environmental costs of maritime shipping in Europe. Stuttgart.
30. Tervonen J., Hämekoski K., Otterström T., Peter A., Bickel P., Schmid S.A. UNITE (Unification of Accounts and Marginal Costs for Transport Efficiency) Deliverable 11 Appendix: Marginal Cost Case Study 9c Nordic Maritime Shipping 2002, ITS, University of Leeds, Leeds.
31. Tzannatos E. Ship emissions and their externalities for Greece. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44(18):2194-2202.
32. Tzannatos E. Ship emissions and their externalities for the port of Piraeus - Greece. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44(3):400-407.
33. UNCTAD Review of Maritime Transport 2011, United Nations, New York and Geneva.
34. UNCTAD Review of Maritime Transport 2012, United Nations, New York and Geneva.
35. Vanherle, K., Delhaye, E., 2010. External costs of maritime transport. Brussels: European Community of Ship owners' Associations (ECSA).
36. Wang C., Corbett J.J. The costs and benefits of reducing SO2 emissions from ships in the US West Coastal waters. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2007, 12(8):577-588.