A plea for more interactions between psycholinguistics and natural language processing research

Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages 209-222

  Brysbaert, Marc ^a   Keuleers, Emmanuel ^a   Mandera, Pawe ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NEW APPROACHES; PROCESSING TIME; SUBJECTIVE RATING; WORD RECOGNITION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84921908026     PISSN: 22114009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (58)

1. Arnon, I. and N. Snider (2010), More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases, Journal of Memory and Language 62, pp. 67-82.
2. Baayen, R. H. (2010), A real experiment is a factorial experiment, The Mental Lexicon 5 (1), pp. 149- 157.
3. Baayen, R. H., P. Milin, Hendrix P. Durdević, D. F., and M. Marelli (2011), An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning, Psychological Review 118, pp. 438-481.
4. Balota, D. A., M. J. Cortese, S. D. Sergent-Marshall, D. H. Spieler, and M. J. Yap (2004), Visual word recognition of single-syllable words, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133, pp. 283- 316.
5. Balota, D. A., M. J. Yap, K. A. Hutchison, and M. J. Cortese (2013), Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing?, in Adelman, J. S., editor, Visual Word Recognition Volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology, Psychology Press, New York, NY, pp. 90-115.
6. Balota, D. A., M. J. Yap, M. J. Cortese, K. A. Hutchison, B. Kessler, B. Loftis, J. H. Neely, D. L. Nelson, G. B. Simpson, and R. Treiman (2007), The English lexicon project, Behavior Research Methods 39, pp. 445-459.
7. Bestgen, Y. and N. Vincze (2012), Checking and bootstrapping lexical norms by means of word similarity indexes, Behavior Research Methods 44 (4), pp. 998-1006.
8. Black, W., S. Elkateb, H. Rodriguez, M. Alkhalifa, P. Vossen, A. Pease, and C. Fellbaum (2006), Introducing the Arabic wordnet project, Proceedings of the 3rd International Word Net Conference (GWC-06), pp. 295-299.
9. Brysbaert, M., A. B. Warriner, and V. Kuperman (2014a), Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas, Behavior Research Methods 46, pp. 904-911.
10. Brysbaert, M. and B. New (2009), Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English, Behavior Research Methods 41, pp. 977-990.
11. Brysbaert, M., B. New, and E. Keuleers (2012), Adding Part-of-Speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies, Behavior Research Methods 44, pp. 991-997.
12. Brysbaert, M., E. Keuleers, P. Mandera, and M. Stevens (2014b), Woordenkennis van Nederlanders en Vlamingen anno 2013: Resultaten van het Groot Nationaal Onderzoek Taal, Gent: Academia Press. (see also http://crr.ugent.be/archives/1494).
13. Brysbaert, M., M. Buchmeier, M. Conrad, A. M. Jacobs, J. Bolte, and A. Bohl (2011), The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German, Experimental Psychology 58, pp. 412-424.
14. Brysbaert, M., M. Stevens, De Deyne Voorspoels S. W., and G. Storms (2014c), Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30, 000 Dutch words, Acta Psychologica 150, pp. 80-84.
15. Bullinaria, J. A. and J. P. Levy (2012), Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: Stop-lists, stemming, and SVD, Behavior Research Methods 44, pp. 890-907.
16. Cai, Q. and M. Brysbaert (2010), Subtlex-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles, PLoS ONE 5 (6), pp. 1-8.
17. Cutler, A. (1981), Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990?, Cognition 10 (1), pp. 65-70.
18. Dimitropoulou, M., J. A. Dunabeitia, A. Aviles, J. Corral, and M. Carreiras (2009), Subtitle-based word frequencies as the best estimate of reading behavior: The case of Greek, Frontiers in psychology 1, pp. 218-218.
19. Ferrand, L., B. New, M. Brysbaert, E. Keuleers, P. Bonin, A. Meot, M. Augustinova, and C. Pallier (2010), The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38, 840 French words and 38, 840 pseudowords, Behavior Research Methods 42, pp. 488-496.
20. Gerhand, S. and C. Barry (1999), Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task, Memory and Cognition 27 (4), pp. 592-602.
21. Gilhooly, K. J. and R. H. Logie (1980), Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1, 944 words, Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 12, pp. 395- 427.
22. Guerini, M., L. Gatti, and M. Turchi (2013), Sentiment analysis: How to derive prior polarities from SentiWordNet. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.5843.pdf.
23. Hill, F. and A. Korhonen (2014), Concretenss and subjectivity as dimensions of lexical meaning, Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Short Papers), pp. 725-731. http://acl2014.org/acl2014/P14-2/pdf/P14-2118.pdf.
24. Hoffman, P., M. A. L. Ralph, and T. T. Rogers (2013), Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words, Behavior Research Methods 45, pp. 718-730.
25. Hofland, K. and S. Johansson (1982), Word frequencies in British and American English, Bergen: Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.
26. Jones, M. N., B. T. Johns, and G. Recchia (2012), The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale 66, pp. 115-124.
27. Keuleers, E. and M. Brysbaert (2010), Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator, Behavior Research Methods 42, pp. 627-633.
28. Keuleers, E., K. Diependaele, and M. Brysbaert (2010a), Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14, 000 Dutch mono- And disyllabic words and nonwords, Frontiers in Psychology 1, pp. 174.
29. Keuleers, E., M. Brysbaert, and B. New (2010b), Subtlex-NL: A new frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles, Behavior Research Methods 42, pp. 643-650.
30. Keuleers, E., M. Stevens, P. Mandera, and M. Brysbaert (in press), Word knowledge in the crowd: Results of a massive online vocabulary test.
31. Keuleers, E., P. Lacey, K. Rastle, and M. Brysbaert (2012), The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28, 730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words, Behavior Research Methods 44, pp. 287-304.
32. Kuperman, V., H. Stadthagen-Gonzalez, and M. Brysbaert (2012), Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30, 000 English words, Behavior Research Methods 44 (4), pp. 978-990.
33. Kuperman, V., Z. Estes, M. Brysbaert, and A. B. Warriner (2014), Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143 (3), pp. 1065-1081.
34. Kučera, H. and W. N. Francis (1967), Computational analysis of present-day American English, Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
35. Landauer, T. K. and S. T. Dumais (1997), A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge, Psychological Review 104, pp. 211-240.
36. Lemhofer, K. and M. Broersma (2012), Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English, Behavior Research Methods 44 (2), pp. 325-343.
37. Mandera, P., E. Keuleers, and M. Brysbaert (in press a), How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables?, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycholoogy.
38. Mandera, P., E. Keuleers, Z. Wodniecka, and M. Brysbaert (in press b), Subtlexpl: subtitle-based word frequency estimates for polish, Behavior Research Methods. http://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13428-014-0489-4.
39. Meara, P. and B. Buxton (1987), An alternative to multiple choice vocabulary tests, Language Testing 4 (2), pp. 142-154.
40. Mikolov, T., Q. V. Le, and I. Sutskever (2013), Exploiting Similarities among Languages for Machine Translation, arXiv:1309. http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.4168].
41. Miller, G. A. (1995), Word net: A lexical database for English, Communications of the ACM 38 (11), pp. 39-41.
42. Moors, A., De Houwer, Hermans J., Wanmaker D., van Schie S., Van Harmelen K., De Schryver A., De Winne M. J., and M. Brysbaert (2013), Norms of valence, arousal, dominance, and age of acquisition for 4300 Dutch Words, Behavior Research Methods 45, pp. 169-177.
43. Morrison, C. M. and A. W. Ellis (1995), Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1), pp. 116-133.
44. Muresan, I., A. Stan, M. Giurgiu, and R. Potolea (2013), Evaluation of sentiment polarity prediction using a dimensional and a categorical approach, Speech Technology and Human-Computer Dialogue (SpeD), pp. 1-6. http://consortium.simple4all.org/files/2013/09/SentencePolarity-AS.pdf.
45. New, B., M. Brysbaert, J. Veronis, and C. Pallier (2007), The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies, Applied Psycholinguistics 28, pp. 661-677.
46. Polajnar, T., L. Fagarasan, and S. Clark (2014), Learning type-driven tensor-based meaning representations. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.5985v2.pdf.
47. Recchia, G. and M. N. Jones (2012), The semantic richness of abstract concepts, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6, pp. 1-16.
48. Ruppenhofer, J., M. Wiegand, and J. Brandes (2014), Comparing methods for deriving intensity scores for adjectives, EACL 2014. http://anthology.aclweb.org//E/E14/E14-4.pdf#page=137.
49. Shardlow, M. (2014), Out in the Open: Finding and Categorising Errors in the Lexical Simplification Pipeline, Reykjavik: LREC9. http://www.lrecconf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/pdf/479-Paper.pdf.
50. Siyanova-Chanturia, A., K. Conklin, and W. J. van Heuven (2011), Seeing a phrase "time and again" matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37, pp. 776-784.
51. Spieler, D. H. and D. A. Balota (1997), Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level, Psychological Science 8, pp. 411-416.
52. Sze, W. P., Rickard Liow, S. J., and M. J. Yap (2014), The Chinese Lexicon Project: A repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2, 500 Chinese characters, Behavior Research Methods 46 (1), pp. 263-73.
53. Turney, P. D. and P. Pantel (2010), From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 37, pp. 141-188.
54. Vajjala, S. and D. Meurers (in press), Readability Assessment for Text Simplification: From Analyzing Documents to Identifying Sentential Simplifications.
55. van Heuven, W. J. B., P. Mandera, M. Keuleers, and M. Brysbaert (2014), Subtlex-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67, pp. 1176-1190.
56. Vossen, P., L. Bloksma, and P. Boersma (1999), The Dutch WordNet, University of Amsterdam.
57. Warriner, A. B., V. Kuperman, and M. Brysbaert (2013), Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13, 915 English lemmas, Behavior Research Methods 45 (4), pp. 1191-1207.
58. Yap, M. J., S. E. Tan, P. M. Pexman, and I. S. Hargreaves (2011), Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18, pp. 742-750.