Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 718-730

  Hoffman, Paul ^a   Lambon Ralph, Matthew A ^a   Rogers, Timothy T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Linguistic context; Polysemy; Semantic ambiguity; Semantic cognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APHASIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; APHASIA; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LANGUAGE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 84881606784     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17, 814-823.
2. Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 578-602.
3. Bedny, M., Hulbert, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2007). Understanding words in context: The role of Broca's area in word comprehension. Brain Research, 1146, 101-114.
4. Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 63-85. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 22. 1. 63.
5. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisities on understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
6. British National Corpus Consortium. (2007). British National Corpus version 3 (BNC XMLth ed.). Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Computing Services.
7. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497-505. doi: 10. 1080/14640748108400805.
8. Corbett, F., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2011). Deregulated semantic cognition follows prefrontal and temporoparietal damage: Evidence from the impact of task constraint on non-verbal object use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1125-1135.
9. Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
10. Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211.
11. Galbraith, R. C., & Underwood, B. J. (1973). Perceived frequency of concrete and abstract words. Memory & Cognition, 1, 56-60.
12. Giles, J. T., Wo, L., & Berry, M. W. (2004). GTP (general text parser) software for text mining. In H. Bozdogan (Ed.), Statistical data mining and knowledge (pp. 455-471). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
13. Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114, 211-244. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 114. 2. 211.
14. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
15. Head, H. (1926). Aphasia and kindred disorders. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1996). Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1331-1356. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 22. 6. 1331.
17. Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2002). Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 686-713.
18. Hoffman, P., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2010). Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex plays an executive regulation role in comprehension of abstract words: Convergent neuropsychological and rTMS evidence. Journal of Neuroscience, 46, 15450-15456.
19. Hoffman, P., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2011). Remembering "zeal" but not "thing": Reverse frequency effects as a consequence of deregulated semantic processing. Neuropsychologia, 49, 580-584.
20. Hoffman, P., Rogers, T. T., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2011). Semantic diversity accounts for the "missing" word frequency effect in stroke aphasia: Insights using a novel method to quantify contextual variability in meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2432-2446.
21. Jastrzembski, J. E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 278-305.
22. Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006). Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia vs. semantic dementia: A case-series comparison. Brain, 129, 2132-2147.
23. Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., Jones, R. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2009). Comprehension of concrete and abstract words in semantic dementia. Neuropsychology, 23, 492-499. doi: 10. 1037/a0015452.
24. Jones, M. N., Johns, B. T., & Recchia, G. (2012). The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 115-124. doi: 10. 1037/a0026727.
25. Kellas, G., Ferraro, F. R., & Simpson, G. B. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 14, 601-609.
26. Kieras, D. (1978). Beyond pictures and words: Alternative information-processing models for imagery effect in verbal memory. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 532-554. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 85. 3. 532.
27. Klein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 259-282.
28. Lambon Ralph, M. A., Sage, K., Jones, R., & Mayberry, E. (2010). Coherent concepts are computed in the anterior temporal lobes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 2717-2722.
29. Landauer, T. K. (2001). Single representations of multiple meanings in latent semantic analysis. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 217-232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 104. 2. 211.
31. Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203-208. doi: 10. 3758/BF03204766.
32. McClelland, J. L., St. John, M. F., & Taraban, R. (1989). Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach. Language & Cognitive Processes, 4, 287-335.
33. McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2001). Rethinking the word frequency effect: The neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing. Language and Speech, 44, 295-323.
34. Metzler, C. (2001). Effects of left frontal lesions on the selection of context-appropriate meanings. Neuropsychology, 15, 315-328.
35. Miller, G. A. (1995). WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38, 39-41.
36. Morton, J. (1979). Word recognition. In J. Morton & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Psycholinguistics 2: Structure and processes (pp. 108-156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Noonan, K. A., Jefferies, E., Corbett, F., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2010). Elucidating the nature of deregulated semantic cognition in semantic aphasia: Evidence for the roles of the prefrontal and temporoparietal cortices. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1597-1613.
38. Piercey, C. D., & Joordens, S. (2000). Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks. Memory & Cognition, 28, 657-666.
39. Rodd, J. M. (2004). The effect of semantic ambiguity on reading aloud: A twist in the tale. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 440-445. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196592.
40. Rodd, J. M., Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2005). The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1261-1269.
41. Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 245-266. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 2001. 2810.
42. Rodd, J. M., Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2004). Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition. Cognitive Science, 28, 89-104. doi: 10. 1207/s15516709cog2801_4.
43. Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111, 205-235. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 111. 1. 205.
44. Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487-494. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(70)80091-3.
46. Saffran, E. M., Bogyo, L., Schwartz, M. F., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). Does deep dyslexia reflect right hemisphere reading? In M. Coltheart, J. C. Marshall, & K. E. Patterson (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 361-406). London, U. K.: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
47. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 499-520.
48. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 82-102. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 9. 1. 82.
49. St. John, M. F. (1992). The story gestalt: A model of knowledge-intensive processes in text comprehension. Cognitive Science, 16, 271-306. doi: 10. 1207/s15516709cog1602_5.
50. Woollams, A. M. (2005). Imageability and ambiguity effects in speeded naming: Convergence and divergence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 878-890.
51. Yap, M. J., Tan, S. E., Pexman, P. M., & Hargreaves, I. S. (2011). Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 742-750.
52. Zeno, S., Ivens, S., Millard, R., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. Brewer, NY: Touchstone.