Comparison of femoral neck BMD evaluation obtained using lunar DXA and QCT with asynchronous calibration from CT colonography

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 5-12

  Pickhardt, Perry J ^a   Bodeen, Gabriel ^b   Brett, Alan ^b   Brown, J Keenan ^b   Binkley, Neil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b Mindways Software Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone densitometry; Colonography; QCT; Quantitative; Radiology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR NECK; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING PHANTOM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OSTEOPENIA; OSTEOPOROSIS; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; X RAY BONE DENSITOMETER; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; PROCEDURES; RADIATION AND RADIATION RELATED PHENOMENA; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; BONE DENSITY; CALIBRATION; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; RADIOLOGIC HEALTH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84921889788     PISSN: 10946950     EISSN: 15590747     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2014.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2004 Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services.
2. Lewiecki E.M., Gordon C.M., Baim S., et al. International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007 Adult and Pediatric Official Positions. Bone 2008, 43(6):1115-1121.
3. National Osteoporosis Foundation. 2013 Clinician's Guide to the Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation.
4. Summers R.M., Baecher N., Yao J., et al. Feasibility of simultaneous computed tomographic colonography and fully automated bone mineral densitometry in a single examination. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011, 35(2):212-216.
5. Pickhardt P.J., Lee L.J., del Rio A.M. Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard. J Bone Miner Res 2011, 26(9):2194-2203.
6. Adams J.E. "Quantitative computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2009, 71(3):415-424.
7. Yu E.W., Thomas B.J., Brown J.K., et al. Simulated increases in body fat and errors in bone mineral density measurements by DXA and QCT. J Bone Miner Res 2011, 27(1):119-124.
8. Guglielmi G., Floriani I., Torri V., et al. Effect of spinal degenerative changes on volumetric bone mineral density of the central skeleton as measured by quantitative computed tomography. Acta Radiol 2005, 46(3):269-275.
9. Smith J.A., Vento J.A., Spencer R.P., et al. Aortic calcification contributing to bone densitometry measurement. J Clin Densitom 1999, 2(2):181-183.
10. Liu G., Peacock M., Eilam O., et al. Effect of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine and hip on bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int 1997, 7(6):564-569.
11. Faulkner K.G., von Stetten E., Miller P. Discordance in patient classification using T-scores. J Clin Densitom 1999, 2(3):343-350.
12. American College of Radiology. 2008 ACR Practice Guideline for the Performance of Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Bone Densitometry. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology.
13. Khoo B.C.C., Brown J.K., Cann C.E., et al. Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores. Osteoporos Int 2009, 20(9):1539-1545.
14. Kim D.H., Pickhardt P.J., Taylor A.J., et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007, 357(14):1403-1412.
15. Pickhardt P.J. Screening CT colonography: how I do it. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 189(2):290-298.
16. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003, 349(23):2191-2200.
17. Pickhardt P.J., Taylor A.J. Extracolonic findings identified in asymptomatic adults at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186(3):718-728.
18. Boden S.D., Goodenough D.J., Stockham C.D., et al. Precise measurement of vertebral bone density using computed tomography without the use of an external reference phantom. J Digit Imaging 1989, 2(1):31-38.
19. Mueller D.K., Kutscherenko A., Bartel H., et al. "Phantom-less QCT BMD system as screening tool for osteoporosis without additional radiation. Eur J Radiol 2011, 79(3):375-381.
20. Cann C.E. Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review. Radiology 1988, 166(2):509-522.
21. Bligh M., Bidaut L., White R.A., et al. Helical multidetector row quantitative computed tomography (QCT) precision. Acad Radiol 2009, 16(2):150-159.
22. Pickhardt P.J., Pooler B.D., Lauder T., et al. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann Intern Med 2013, 158(8):588-595.
23. Bauer J.S., Henning T.D., Müeller D., et al. Volumetric quantitative CT of the spine and hip derived from contrast-enhanced MDCT: conversion factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188(5):1294-1301.
24. Link T.M., Koppers B.B., Licht T., et al. Invitro and in vivospiral CT to determine bone mineral density: initial experience in patients at risk for osteoporosis. Radiology 2004, 231(3):805-811.
25. Kanis J.A., Johnell O., Oden A., et al. FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19(4):385-397.
26. Genant H.K., Grampp S., Glüer C.C., et al. Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 1994, 9(10):1503-1514.
27. Binkley N., Kiebzak G.M., Lewiecki E.M., et al. Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence. J Bone Miner Res 2005, 20(2):195-201.
28. Fan B., Lu Y., Genant H., et al. Does standardized BMD still remove differences between Hologic and GE-Lunar state-of-the-art DXA systems?. Osteoporos Int 2010, 21(7):1227-1236.
29. Lou Bonnick S. Bone Densitometry in Clinical Practice 2010, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
30. Kanis J.A., McCloskey E.V., Johansson H., et al. A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. Bone 2008, 42(3):467-475.
31. Kiebzak G.M., Faulkner K.G., Wacker W.K., et al. Effect of precision error on T-scores and the diagnostic classification of bone status. J Clin Densitom 2007, 10(3):239-243.