Volumetric quantitative CT of the spine and hip derived from contrast-enhanced MDCT: Conversion factors

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 188, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1294-1301

  Bauer, Jan S ^a,b   Henning, Tobias D ^b   Müeller, Dirk ^a   Lu, Ying ^b   Majumdar, Sharmila ^b   Link, Thomas M ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Dual energy X ray absorptiometry; Femur; Fractures; Geriatrics; MDCT; Osteoporosis; Quantitative CT; Spine

Indexed keywords

DIATRIZOATE; IOHEXOL;

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LUMBAR SPINE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; POSTMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VERTEBRA FRACTURE; VOLUMETRY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE DENSITY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HIP; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POSTMENOPAUSE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FRACTURES; SPINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34247621190     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.1006     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Link TM, Guglielmi G, van Kuijk C, Adams JE. Radiologic assessment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: diagnostic and prognostic implications. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:1521-1532
2. Guglielmi G, Lang TF. Quantitative computed tomography. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002; 6:219-227
3. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionising radiation. In: Medical radiation exposures: sources. New York, NY: United Nations, 2000
4. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R, Ulzheimer S, Bruder H. Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. Rofo 2004; 176:1803-1810
5. Kopka L, Rogalla P, Hamm B. Multislice CT of the abdomen: current indications and future trends [in German]. Rofo 2002; 174:273-282
6. Hopper K, Ming-Peng W, Kunselman A. The use of clinical CT for baseline bone density assessment. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24:896-899
7. Link TM, Koppers BB, Licht T, Bauer J, Lu Y, Rummeny EJ. In vitro and in vivo spiral CT to determine bone mineral density: initial experience in patients at risk for osteoporosis. Radiology 2004; 231:805-811
8. Gilsanz V, Boechat M, Roe T, Loro M, Sayre J, Goodman W. Gender differences in vertebral body sizes in adults: biomechanical implications. Radiology 1994; 190:678-682
9. Gilsanz V, Loro M, Roe T, Sayre J, Gilsanz R, Schulz E. Vertebral size of elderly women with osteoporosis: mechanical implications and relationship to fractures. J Clin Invest 1995; 95:2332-2337
10. Link TM, Doren M, Lewing G, Meier N, Heinecke A, Rummeny E. Cross-sectional area of lumbar vertebrae in peri- and postmenopausal patients with and without osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11:304-309
11. Bauer JS, Muller D, Ambekar A, et al. Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17:608-615
12. Davis JW, Grove JS, Wasnich RD, Ross PD. Spatial relationships between prevalent and incident spine fractures. Bone 1999; 24:261-264
13. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8:1137-1148
14. Bland JM, Alrman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310
15. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143:29-36
16. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook NP, Eisman JA. Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 1999; 353:878-882
17. Chrischilles E, Shireman T, Wallace R. Costs and health effects of osteoporotic fractures. Bone 1994; 15:377-386
18. Cann C. Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review. Radiology 1988; 166:509-522
19. Genant H, Cann C, Ettinger B, Gordan G. Quantitative computed tomography of vertebral spongiosa: a sensitive method for detecting early bone loss after oophorectomy. Ann Intern Med 1982; 97:699-704
20. Black DM, Greenspan SL, Ensrud KE, et al. The effects of parathyroid hormone and alendronate alone or in combination in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:1207-1215
21. Bergot C, Laval-Jeantet A, Hutchinson K, Dautraix I, Caulin F, Genant H. A comparison of spinal quantitative computed tomography with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in European women with vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 2001; 68:74-82
22. Duboeuf F, Jergas M, Schott A, Wu C, Gluer C, Genant H. A comparison of bone densitometry measurements of the central skeleton in post-menopausal women with and without vertebral fracture. Br J Radiol 1995; 68:747-753
23. Grampp S, Genant H, Mathur A, et al. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12:697-711
24. Guglielmi G, Grimston S, Fischer K, Pacifici R. Osteoporosis: diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual x-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT. Radiology 1994; 192:845-850
25. Lafferty F, Rowland D. Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures. Osteoporos Int 1996; 6:407-415
26. Ott S, Kilcoyne R, Chestnut C. Ability of four different techniques of measuring bone mass to diagnose vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 1987; 2:201-210
27. Pacifici R, Rupich R, Griffin M, Chines A, Susman N, Avioli L. Dual energy radiography versus quantitative computer tomography for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990; 70:705-710
28. Rehman Q, Lang T, Modin G, Lane NE. Quantitative computed tomography of the lumbar spine, not dual x-ray absorptiometry, is an independent predictor of prevalent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia receiving long-term glucocorticoid and hormone-replacement therapy. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46:1292-1297
29. Yamada M, Ito M, Hayashi K, Ohki M, Nakamura T. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture. AJR 1994; 163:1435-1440
30. Carr J, Shi R, Lenchik L, Langefeld C, Lange L, Bowden D. Validation of quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone mineral density in the thoracic spine during a cardiac gated protocol for coronary vascular calcium (abstract). Radiology 2001; 221[program]:380
31. Griffith JF, Yeung DK, Antonio GE, et al. Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2005; 236:945-951
32. Thomsen JS, Ebbesen EN, Mosekilde L. Zone-dependent changes in human vertebral trabecular bone: clinical implications. Bone 2002; 30:664-669
33. Pfeilschifter J, Diel I. Osteoporosis due to cancer treatment: pathogenesis and management. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:1570-1593
34. Keilholz U, Max R, Scheibenbogen C, Wuster C, Korbling M, Haas R. Endocrine function and bone metabolism 5 years after autologous bone marrow/blood-derived progenitor cell transplantation. Cancer 1997; 79:1617-1622
35. Li W, Sode M, Saeed I, Lang T. Automated registration of hip and spine for longitudinal QCT studies: integration with 3D densitometric and structural analysis. Bone 2006; 38:273-279