Unsorted homology within locus and species trees

Systematic Biology

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 988-992

  Mallo, Diego ^a   De Oliveira Martins, Leonardo ^a   Posada, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; STATISTICS;

CLASSIFICATION; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84921873929     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syu050     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Avise J.C., Robinson T.J. 2008. Hemiplasy: a new term in the lexicon of phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 57:503-507.
2. Edwards S.V. 2009. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging? Evolution 63:1-19.
3. Fitch W.M. 1970. Distinguishing homologous fromanalogous proteins. Syst. Zool. 19:99-113.
4. Fitch W.M. 2000. Homology: a personal viewon some of the problems. Trends Genet. 16:227-231.
5. Fitch W.M., Upper K. 1987. The phylogeny of tRNA sequences provides evidence for ambiguity reduction in the origin of the genetic code. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 52:759-767.
6. Gabaldon T., Koonin E.V. 2013. Functional and evolutionary implications of gene orthology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14:360-366.
7. Goodman M., Czelusniak J., Moore G., Romero-Herrera A., Matsuda G. 1979. Fitting the gene lineage into its species lineage, a parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences. Syst. Zool. 28:132-163.
8. Gray G.S., FitchW.M. 1983. Evolution of antibiotic resistance genes: the DNA sequence of a kanamycin resistance gene from staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1:57-66.
9. Jeffroy O., Brinkmann H., Delsuc F., Philippe H. 2006. Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence? Trends Genet. 22:225-231.
10. Maddison W. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
11. Mindell D.P., Meyer A. 2001. Homology evolving. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:434-440.
12. Page R.D., Charleston M.A. 1997. From gene to organismal phylogeny: reconciled trees and the gene tree/species tree problem. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:231-240.
13. Pamilo P., Nei M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-583.
14. Rannala B., Yang Z. 2003. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes usingDNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics 164:1645-1656.
15. Rasmussen M.D., Kellis M. 2012. Unified modeling of gene duplication, loss, and coalescence using a locus tree. Genome Res. 22:755-765.
16. Salichos L., RokasA. 2013. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 497:327-331.
17. Takahata N. 1989. Gene geneology in three related populations: consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 122:957-966.
18. Wu Y.C., Rasmussen M.D., Bansal M.S., Kellis M. 2014. Most parsimonious reconciliation in the presence of gene duplication, Res. 24:475-486.