Accounting for uncertainty in DNA sequencing data

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 61-66

  O'Rawe, Jason A ^a,b,c   Ferson, Scott ^b,c   Lyon, Gholson J ^a,b,d  

^a Simons Center for Quantitative Biology   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c APPLIED BIOMATHEMATICS   (United States)

^d Utah Foundation for Biomedical Research   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA sequencing; Sequence errors; Uncertainty; Uncertainty accounting

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ALLELE; CALIBRATION; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA STRAND; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REVIEW; UNCERTAINTY; HUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BASE SEQUENCE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84921869954     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: 13624555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.12.002     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Anders S., et al. Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat. Protocols 2013, 8:1765-1786.
2. Trapnell C., et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protocols 2012, 7:562-578.
3. Cooper G.M., Shendure J. Needles in stacks of needles: finding disease-causal variants in a wealth of genomic data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:628-640.
4. Nielsen R., et al. Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:443-451.
5. Yandell M., Ence D. A beginner's guide to eukaryotic genome annotation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13:329-342.
6. Hawkins R.D., et al. Next-generation genomics: an integrative approach. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:476-486.
7. Ferson S., et al. Constructing Probability Boxes and Dempster-Shafer Structures 2002, Sandia National Laboratories.
8. Skotte L., et al. Association testing for next-generation sequencing data using score statistics. Genet. Epidemiol. 2012, 36:430-437.
9. Vieira F.G., et al. Estimating inbreeding coefficients from NGS data: impact on genotype calling and allele frequency estimation. Genome Res. 2013, 23:1852-1861.
10. Skotte L., et al. Estimating individual admixture proportions from next generation sequencing data. Genetics 2013, 195:693-702.
11. Fumagalli M., et al. Quantifying population genetic differentiation from next-generation sequencing data. Genetics 2013, 195:979-992.
12. Korneliussen T.S., et al. Calculation of Tajima's D and other neutrality test statistics from low depth next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 2013, 14:289.
13. Kim S., et al. Estimation of allele frequency and association mapping using next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:231.
14. Ewing B., Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998, 8:186-194.
15. Richterich P. Estimation of errors in 'raw' DNA sequences: a validation study. Genome Res. 1998, 8:251-259.
16. Robasky K., et al. The role of replicates for error mitigation in next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15:56-62.
17. O'Rawe J., et al. Low concordance of multiple variant-calling pipelines: practical implications for exome and genome sequencing. Genome Med. 2013, 5:28.
18. Purcell S.M., et al. A polygenic burden of rare disruptive mutations in schizophrenia. Nature 2014, 506:185-190.
19. Lee H., Schatz M.C. Genomic dark matter: the reliability of short read mapping illustrated by the Genome Mappability Score. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:2097-2105.
20. Li H., et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2078-2079.
21. DePristo M.A., et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:491-498.
22. Smith T.F., Waterman M.S. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 1981, 147:195-197.
23. Garrison E., Marth G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arXiv 2012, 1207:3907.
24. Wei Z., et al. SNVer: a statistical tool for variant calling in analysis of pooled or individual next-generation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:e132.
25. Zhao Z., et al. An empirical Bayes testing procedure for detecting variants in analysis of next generation sequencing data. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2013, 7:2229-2248.
26. Rimmer A., et al. Integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46:912-918.
27. Narzisi G., et al. Accurate de novo and transmitted indel detection in exome-capture data using microassembly. Nat. Methods 2014, 11:1033-1036.
28. Li S., et al. SOAPindel: Efficient identification of indels from short paired reads. Genome Res. 2013, 23:195-200.
29. Lee H., et al. Error correction and assembly complexity of single molecule sequencing reads 2014, Published online June 18, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/006395.
30. Koren S., et al. Hybrid error correction and de novo assembly of single-molecule sequencing reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30:693-700.
31. Meacham F., et al. Identification and correction of systematic error in high-throughput sequence data. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:451.
32. Ferson S., et al. Experimental Uncertainty Estimation and Statistics for Data Having Interval Uncertainty 2007, Sandia National Laboratories.
33. Fréchet M. Généralisations du Théorème Des Probabilités Totales 1935, Fundamenta Mathematica.
34. Neumaier A. Interval Methods for Systems of Equations 1990, Cambridge University Press.
35. Alefeld G., Herzberger J. Introduction to Interval Computation 1984, Academic Press.
36. Moore R.E., Moore R. Methods and Applications of Interval Analysis 1979, SIAM.
37. Moore R.E. Interval Analysis 1966, Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs.
38. Dwyer P.S. Linear computations 1951, John Wiley, New York.
39. Frank M.J., et al. Best-possible bounds for the distribution of a sum: a problem of Kolmogorov. Probab. Theory Rel. Fields 1987, 74:199-211.
40. Williamson R.C., Downs T. Probabilistic arithmetic. I. Numerical methods for calculating convolutions and dependency bounds. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 1990, 4:89-158.
41. Ferson S. Quality assurance for Monte Carlo risk assessment. Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, 1995, and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society. Proceedings of ISUMA-NAFIPS'95, Third International Symposium 1995, pp. 14, 19, 17-19. IEEF http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527662.
42. Ferson S., Hajagos J.G. Arithmetic with uncertain numbers: rigorous and (often) best possible answers. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2004, 85:135-152.
43. Walley P. Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities 1991, Chapman and Hall London.
44. Berger J.O. Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis 1985, Springer.
45. Berger J.O., et al. An overview of robust Bayesian analysis. Test 1994, 3:5-124.
46. Insua D.R., Ruggeri F. Robust Bayesian Analysis 2000, Springer.
47. Pericchi L.R. Sets of Prior Probabilities and Bayesian Robustness 1998, The Society for Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, http://www.sipta.org/documentation/robust/pericchi.pdf.
48. Pericchi L.R., Pérez M.E. Posterior robustness with more than one sampling model. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 1994, 40:279-294.
49. Moreno E., Pericchi L.R. Bayesian robustness for hierarchical ε-contamination models. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 1993, 37:159-167.
50. Ferson S., et al. Computing with confidence: imprecise posteriors and predictive distributions. Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risks: Quantification, Mitigation, and Management 2014, 895-904. ASCE http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784413609.091. M. Beer (Ed.).
51. Balch M.S. Mathematical foundations for a theory of confidence structures. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 2012, 53:1003-1019.
52. Ferson S., et al. Computing with confidence. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theory and Applications 2013.
53. Novocraft Novoalign 2014, Novocraft, https://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/guide/article?id=4146.
54. Broad Institute HaplotypeCaller 2014, Broad Institute, https://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/guide/article?id=4146.
55. O'Rawe J., et al. Low concordance of multiple variant-calling pipelines: practical implications for exome and genome sequencing. Genome Med. 2013, 5:28.
56. Fang H., et al. Reducing INDEL calling errors in whole-genome and exome sequencing data. Genome Med. 2014, 6:89.
57. Lieberman-Aiden E., et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009, 326:289-293.
58. Dixon J.R., et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 2012, 485:376-380.
59. Beitel C.W., et al. Strain- and plasmid-level deconvolution of a synthetic metagenome by sequencing proximity ligation products. PeerJ 2014, 2:e415.
60. Burton J.N., et al. Species-level deconvolution of metagenome assemblies with Hi-C-based contact probability Maps. G3 2014, 4:1339-1346.
61. Sanyal A., et al. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature 2012, 489:109-113.
62. Lyon G.J., Wang K. Identifying disease mutations in genomic medicine settings: current challenges and how to accelerate progress. Genome Med. 2012, 4:58.
63. Rope A.F., et al. Using VAAST to identify an X-linked disorder resulting in lethality in male infants due to N-terminal acetyltransferase deficiency. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 89:28-43.
64. Nielsen R., et al. SNP Calling, genotype calling, and sample allele frequency estimation from new-generation sequencing data. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e37558.
65. Van der Auwera G.A., et al. From FastQ data to high-confidence variant calls: the genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 2013, John Wiley & Sons.
66. Pearson K. Tables of the Incomplete Beta-Function 1968, Cambridge University Press.