It is not just memory: Propositional thinking influences performance on the autobiographical IAT

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 145, Issue , 2014, Pages 150-155

  Vargo, Elisabeth Julie ^a   Petróczi, Andrea ^a   Shah, Iltaf ^a   Naughton, Declan P ^a  

^a KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Autobiographical IAT; Cocaine; Hair; Self concept

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; GUILT; HAIR ANALYSIS; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TEST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; ROSENBERG SELF ESTEEM SCALE; SELF CONCEPT; SELF ESTEEM; THINKING; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; EPISODIC MEMORY; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; COCAINE; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MEMORY, EPISODIC; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84921834457     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: 18790046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Agosta S., Mega A., Sartori G. Detrimental effects of using negative sentences in the autobiographical IAT. Acta Psychol. 2011, 136:269-275.
2. Agosta S., Pezzoli P., Sartori G. How to detect deception in everyday life and reasons underlying it. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2013, 27:256-262.
3. Agosta S., Sartori G. The autobiographical IAT: a review. Front. Psychol. 2013, 4:1-12.
4. Asendorpf J.B., Conner M., De Fruyt F., De Houwer J., Denissen J.J., Fiedler K., Fiedler S., Funder D.C., Kliegl R., Nosek B.A., Perugini M., Roberts B.W., Schmitt M., Vanaken M.A.G., Weber H., Wicherts J.M. Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. Eur. J. Pers. 2013, 27:108-119.
5. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51:1173.
6. Bosson J.K., Swann W.B., Pennebaker J.W. Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: the blind men and the elephant revisited?. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 79:631.
7. De Houwer J. Using the Implicit Association Test does not rule out an impact of conscious propositional knowledge on evaluative conditioning. Learn. Motiv. 2006, 37:176-187.
8. Dijksterhuis A. I like myself but I don't know why: enhancing implicit self-esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2004, 86:345-355.
9. Freng S., Kehn A. Determining true and false witnessed events: can an eyewitness-Implicit Association Test distinguish between the seen and unseen. Psychiatry Psychol. Law 2013, 20:761-780.
10. Gawronski B., Bodenhausen G.V., Becker A.P. I like it because I like myself: associative self-anchoring and post-decisional change of implicit evaluations. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2007, 43:221-232.
11. Greenwald A.G., Banaji M.R., Rudman L.A., Farnham S.D., Nosek B.A., Mellott D.S. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychol. Rev. 2002, 109:3-25.
12. Greenwald A.G., Farnham S.D. Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 79:1022-1038.
13. Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A. Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures 2008, 65-82. Psychology Press, New York.
14. Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. an improved scoring algorithm. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 85:197-216.
15. Harrison L. The validity of self-reported drug use in survey research: an overview and critique of research methods. NIDA Res. Monogr. 1997, 167:17-36.
16. Hu X., Rosenfeld J.P. Combining the P300-complex trial-based concealed information test and the reaction time-based autobiographical implicit association test in concealed memory detection. Psychophysiology 2012, 49:1090-1100.
17. Hu X., Rosenfeld J.P., Bodenhausen G.V. Combating automatic autobiographical associations. The effect of instruction and training in strategically concealing information in the autobiographical Implicit Association Test. Psychol. Sci. 2012, 23:1079-1085.
18. Hughes S., Barnes-Holmes D., De Houwer J. The dominance of associative theorizing in implicit attitude research: propositional and behavioral alternatives. Psychol. Rec. 2011, 61:465-496.
19. Ioannidis J., Munafò M.R., Fusar-Poli P., Nosek B.A., David S.P. Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2014, 18:235-241.
20. Karpinski A. Measuring self-esteem using the Implicit Association Test: the role of the other. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 2004, 30:22-34.
21. Liberty H.J., Johnson B.D. Detecting cocaine use through sweat testing: multilevel modeling of sweat patch length-of-wear data. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2004, 28:667-673.
22. Nosek B.A. Implicit-explicit relations. Curr. Dir. Psychol. 2007, 16:65-69.
23. Olson M.A., Fazio R.H., Hermann A.D. Reporting tendencies underlie discrepancies between implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 18:287-291.
24. Payne B.K., Gawronski B. A history of implicit social cognition: Where is it coming from? Where is it now? Where is it going?. Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, And Applications 2010, 1-15. Guilford Press, New York. B. Gawronski, B.K. Payne (Eds.).
25. Perugini M., O'Gorman R., Prestwich A. An ontological test of the IAT: self-activation can increase predictive validity. Exp. Psychol. 2007, 54:134-147.
26. Perugini M., Zogmaister C., Richetin J., Prestwich A., Hurling R. Changing implicit attitudes by contrasting the self with others. Soc. Cogn. 2013, 31:443-464.
27. Pragst F., Balikova M.A. State of the art in hair analysis for detection of drug and alcohol abuse. Clin. Chim. Acta 2006, 370:17-49.
28. Prestwich A., Perugini M., Hurling R. Can implementation intentions and text messages promote brisk walking? A randomized trial. Health Psychol. 2010, 29:40-49.
29. Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image 1965, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
30. Rubin M., Hewstone M. Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: a review and some suggestions for clarification. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 1998, 2:40-62.
31. Sartori G., Agosta S., Zogmaister C., Castiello U. How to accurately detect autobiographical events. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 19:772-780.
32. Sriram N., Greenwald A.G. The brief implicit association test. Exp. Psychol. 2009, 56:283-294.
33. Takarangi M.K., Strange D., Houghton E. Event familiarity influences memory detection using the aIAT. Memory 2014, 14:1-9.
34. Takarangi M.K., Strange D., Shortland A.E., James H.E. Source confusion influences the effectiveness of the autobiographical IAT. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2013, 20:1232-1238.
35. Vargo E.J., Petróczi A. Detecting cocaine use? The autobiographical implicit association test (aIAT) produces false positives in a real-world setting. Subst. Abuse Treat. Prev. Policy 2013, 8:22.
36. Verschuere B., Prati V., De Houwer J. Cheating the lie detector: faking in the Autobiographical Implicit Association Test. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20:410-413.
37. Verstraete A.G. Detection times of drugs of abuse in blood, urine, and oral fluid. Ther. Drug Monit. 2004, 26:200-205.
38. Walther E., Trasseli C. I like her, because I like myself: self-evaluation as a source of interpersonal attitudes. Exp. Psychol. 2003, 50:239-246.
39. Wiers R.W., Houben K., de Kraker J. Implicit cocaine associations in active cocaine users and controls. Addict. Behav. 2007, 32:1284-1289.
40. Yamaguchi S., Greenwald A.G., Banaji M.R., Murakami F., Chen D., Shiomura K., Kobayashi C., Cai H., Krendl A. Apparent universality of positive implicit self-esteem. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 18:498-500.
41. Zhang H., Chan D.K.S. Self-esteem as a source of evaluative conditioning. Eur. J. Soc. Pers. 2009, 39:1065-1074.