In silico design of antimicrobial peptides

Computational Peptidology

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 195-219

  Maccari, Giuseppe ^a   Di Luca, Mariagrazia ^b   Nifosì, Riccardo ^b  

^a CENTER FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION NEST   (Italy)

^b SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Amps; De novo peptide design; Drug resistance; Molecular dynamics; Qsar

Indexed keywords

DRUG THERAPY; MICROORGANISMS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULES; POLYPEPTIDES;

AMPS; CATIONIC ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDES; DE NOVO PEPTIDE DESIGN; DRUG RESISTANCE; EVALUATION OF ACTIVITY; NATURAL-ANTIMICROBIALS; QSAR; STRUCTURAL ARRANGEMENT;

PEPTIDES;

EID: 84921820136     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2285-7_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Di Luca M, Maccari G, Nifosì R (2014) Treatment of microbial biofilms in the post antibiotic era: prophylactic and therapeutic use of antimicrobial peptides and their design by bioinformatics tools. Pathog Dis. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24515391. Accessed 14 Feb 2014
2. Salomone F, Cardarelli F, Signore G, Boccardi C, Beltram F (2013) In vitro efficient transfection by CM18-Tat11 hybrid peptide: a new tool for gene-delivery applications. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070108
3. Bahar A, Ren D (2013) Antimicrobial peptides. Pharmaceuticals 6:1543-1575. http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/6/12/1543/. Accessed 29 Nov 2013
4. Shai Y, Oren Z (2001) From "carpet" mechanism to de-novo designed diastereomeric cell-selective antimicrobial peptides. Peptides 22:1629-1641. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11587791. Accessed 29 Dec 2012
5. Fjell CD, Hancock REW, Cherkasov A (2007) AMPer: a database and an automated discovery tool for antimicrobial peptides. Bioinformatics 23:1148-1155. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17341497. Accessed 10 May 2013
6. Rathinakumar R, Wimley WC (2008) Biomolecular engineering by combinatorial design and high-throughput screening: small, soluble peptides that permeabilize membranes. J Am Chem Soc 130:9849-9858. http://www.pub medcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2582735&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstr act. Accessed 22 May 2013
7. Marks JR, Placone J, Hristova K, Wimley WC (2011) Spontaneous membrane-translocating peptides by orthogonal high-throughput screening. J Am Chem Soc 133:8995-9004. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi? artid=3118567&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype= abstract. Accessed 3 Jan 2013
8. Wang P, Hu L, Liu G, Jiang N, Chen X et al (2011) Prediction of antimicrobial peptides based on sequence alignment and feature selection methods. PLoS One 6: e18476. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcg i?artid=3076375&tool=pmcentrez&rendertyp e=abstract. Accessed 15 Mar 2012
9. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H et al (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25:25-29. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=3037419&tool=pmcentrez&render type=abstract. Accessed 21 Jan 2014
10. Li W, Godzik A (2006) Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22:1658-1659. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16731699. Accessed 30 July 2012
11. Piotto SP, Sessa L, Concilio S, Iannelli P (2012) YADAMP: yet another database of antimicrobial peptides. Int J Antimicrob Agents 39:346-351. http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/22325123. Accessed 23 Aug 2012
12. Thomas S, Karnik S, Barai RS, Jayaraman VK, Idicula-Thomas S (2010) CAMP: a useful resource for research on antimicrobial peptides. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D774-D780. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=2808926&tool=pmcentrez& rendertype=abstract. Accessed 23 Aug 2012
13. Wold S, Jonsson J, Sjörström M, Sandberg M, Rännar S (1993) DNA and peptide sequences and chemical processes multivariately modelled by principal component analysis and partial least-squares projections to latent structures. Anal Chim Acta 277:239-253. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/000326709380437P. Accessed 23 July 2012
14. Sokal RR, Thomson BA (2006) Population structure inferred by local spatial autocorrelation:an example from an Amerindian tribal population. Am J Phys Anthropol 129:121-131. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16261547. Accessed 13 Feb 2014
15. Horne DS (1988) Prediction of protein helix content from an autocorrelation analysis of sequence hydrophobicities. Biopolymers 27:451-477. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3359010. Accessed 13 Feb 2014
16. Feng ZP, Zhang CT (2000) Prediction of membrane protein types based on the hydrophobic index of amino acids. J Protein Chem 19:269-275. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11043931. Accessed 13 Feb 2014
17. Jaiswal K, Naik PK (2008) Distinguishing compounds with anticancer activity by ANN using inductive QSAR descriptors. Bioinformation 2:441-451. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih. gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2561164&tool= pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 13 Feb 2014
18. Michaelson JJ, Sebat J (2012) forestSV: structural variant discovery through statistical learning. Nat Methods 9:819-821. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22751202. Accessed 24 Aug 2012
19. Touw WG, Bayjanov JR, Overmars L, Backus L, Boekhorst J et al (2012) Data mining in the life sciences with random forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? Brief Bioinform. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22786785. Accessed 17 July 2012
20. Maccari G, Di Luca M, Nifosí R, Cardarelli F, Signore G, et al (2013) Antimicrobial peptides design by evolutionary multiobjective optimization. PLoS Comput Biol 9: e1003212. http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003212. Accessed 23 Sept 2013
21. Hansen L, Lee EA, Hestir K, Williams LT, Farrelly D (2009) Controlling feature selection in random forests of decision trees using a genetic algorithm: classification of class I MHC peptides. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 12: 514-519. http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19519331. Accessed 14 Feb 2014
22. Peng H, Long F, Ding C (2005) Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell27 27:1226-1238. http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/16119262. Accessed 23 July 2012
23. Hiss JA, Bredenbeck A, Losch FO, Wrede P, Walden P et al (2007) Design of MHC I stabilizing peptides by agent-based exploration of sequence space. Protein Eng Des Sel 20:99-108. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17314106. Accessed 14 Feb 2014
24. Fjell CD, Jenssen H, Cheung WA, Hancock REW, Cherkasov A (2011) Optimization of antibacterial peptides by genetic algorithms and cheminformatics. Chem Biol Drug Des 77:48-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20942839. Accessed 25 May 2012
25. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182-197. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=996017. Accessed 14 July 2012
26. Bocchinfuso G, Bobone S, Mazzuca C, Palleschi A, Stella L (2011) Fluorescence spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulations in studies on the mechanism of membrane destabilization by antimicrobial peptides. Cell Mol Life Sci 68:2281-2301. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21584808. Accessed 6 Aug 2013
27. Gurtovenko AA, Anwar J, Vattulainen I (2010) Defect-mediated trafficking across cell membranes: insights from in silico modeling. Chem Rev 110: 6077-6103. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20690701. Accessed 7 Aug 2013
28. Marrink SJ, de Vries AH, Tieleman DP (2009) Lipids on the move: simulations of membrane pores, domains, stalks and curves. Biochim Biophys Acta 1788:149-168. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19013128. Accessed 7 Aug 2013
29. Bolintineanu DS, Kaznessis YN (2011) Computational studies of protegrin antimicrobial peptides: a review. Peptides 32:188-201. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=3013618&tool=pmcentrez& rendertype=abstract. Accessed 7 Aug 2013
30. Chen L, Gao L (2012) How the antimicrobial peptides kill bacteria: computational physics insights. Commun Comput Phys. http://www.global-sci.com/issue/abstract/readabs. php?vol=11&page=709&issue=3&ppage=725&year=2012. Accessed 7 Aug 2013
31. Leach A (2001) Molecular modelling: principles and applications, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, NJ
32. Ponder JW, Case DA (2003) Force fields for protein simulations. In: Daggett V (ed) Protein simulations, vol 66. Academic, New York, pp 27-85. doi:10.1016/S0065-3233(03)66002-X
33. Mackerell AD (2004) Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: overview and issues. J Comput Chem 25:1584-1604. doi:10.1002/jcc.20082
34. Lange OF, van der Spoel D, de Groot BL (2010) Scrutinizing molecular mechanics force fields on the submicrosecond timescale with NMR data. Biophys J 99:647-655. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.062
35. Lindorff-Larsen K, Maragakis P, Piana S, Eastwood MP, Dror RO et al (2012) Systematic validation of protein force fields against experimental data. PLoS One 7: e32131. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032131. Accessed 21 May 2013
36. Beauchamp KA, Lin Y-S, Das R, Pande VS (2012) Are protein force fields getting better? A systematic benchmark on 524 diverse NMR measurements. J Chem Theory Comp 8:1409-1414. doi:10.1021/ct2007814
37. Cino EA, Choy W-Y, Karttunen M (2012) Comparison of secondary structure formation using 10 different force fields in microsecond molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Theory Comp 8:2725-2740. doi:10.1021/ct300323g
38. Piggot TJ, Piñeiro Á, Khalid S (2012) Molecular dynamics simulations of phosphatidylcholine membranes: a comparative force field study. J Chem Theory Comp 8:4593-4609. doi:10.1021/ct3003157
39. Jämbeck JPM, Lyubartsev AP (2012) An extension and further validation of an all-atomistic force field for biological membranes. J Chem Theory Comp 8:2938-2948. doi:10.1021/ct300342n
40. Shi Y, Xia Z, Zhang J, Best R, Wu C et al (2013) The polarizable atomic multipole-based AMOEBA force field for proteins. J Chem Theory Comp 9:4046-4063. doi:10.1021/ct4003702
41. Guo H, Gresh N, Roques BP, Salahub DR (2000) J Phys Chem B 104:9746-9754
42. Cieplak P, Caldwell J, Kollman P (2001) Molecular mechanical models for organic and biological systems going beyond the atom centered two body additive approximation:aqueous solution free energies of methanol and N-methyl acetamide, nucleic acid base, and amide hydrogen bonding and chloroform/. J Comput Chem 22:1048-1057. doi:10.1002/jcc.1065
43. Tozzini V (2005) Coarse-grained models for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15:144-150. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15837171. Accessed 3 June 2013
44. Baaden M, Marrink SJ (2013) Coarse-grain modelling of protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23:878-886. doi:10.1016/j. sbi.2013.09.004
45. Monticelli L, Kandasamy SK, Periole X, Larson RG, Tieleman DP et al (2008) The MARTINI coarse-grained force field: extension to proteins. J Chem Theory Comp 4:819-834. doi:10.1021/ ct700324x
46. Bennett WFD, Tieleman DP (2011) Water defect and pore formation in atomistic and coarse-grained lipid membranes: pushing the limits of coarse graining. J Chem Theory Comp 12:2981-2988
47. Ayton GS, Noid WG, Voth GA (2007) Multiscale modeling of biomolecular systems:in serial and in parallel. Curr Opin Struct Biol 17:192-198. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2007.03.004
48. Torrie GM, Valleau JP (1977) Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling. J Comput Phys 23:187-199. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(77)90121-8
49. Roux B (1995) The calculation of the potential of mean force using computer simulations. Comput Phys Commun 91:275-282. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(95)00053-I
50. Laio A, Parrinello M (2002) Escaping free-energy minima. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:12562-12566. doi:10.1073/pnas.202427399
51. Huber T, Torda AE, Gunsteren WF (1994) Local elevation: a method for improving the searching properties of molecular dynamics simulation. J Comput Aided Mol Des 8:695-708. doi:10.1007/BF00124016
52. Grubmüller H (1995) Predicting slow structural transitions in macromolecular systems: conformational flooding. Phys Rev E Stat Plasmas Fluids Retat Interdiscip Topics 52:2893-2906. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.52.2893
53. Adamson S, Kharlampidi D, Dementiev A (2008) Stabilization of resonance states by an asymptotic Coulomb potential. J Chem Phys 128:024101. doi:10.1063/1.2821102
54. Yesylevskyy S, Marrink S-J, Mark AE (2009) Alternative mechanisms for the interaction of the cell-penetrating peptides penetratin and the TAT peptide with lipid bilayers. Biophys J 97: 40-49. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih. gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2711361&tool= pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 6 Aug 2013
55. Sugita Y, Yuko Y (1999) Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem Phys Lett 314:141-151
56. Sugita Y, Okamoto Y (2000) Replica-exchange multicanonical algorithm and multicanonical replica-exchange method for simulating systems with rough energy landscape. Chem Phys Lett 329:261-270
57. Wang L, Friesner RA, Berne BJ (2011) Replica exchange with solute scaling: a more efficient version of replica exchange with solute tempering (REST2). J Phys Chem B 115:9431-9438. doi:10.1021/jp204407d
58. Bussi G, Gervasio FL, Laio A, Parrinello M (2006) Free-energy landscape for beta hairpin folding from combined parallel tempering and metadynamics. J Am Chem Soc 128:13435-13441. doi:10.1021/ja062463w
59. Feller SE, Zhang Y, Pastor RW, Brooks BR (1995) Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method. J Chem Phys 103:4613. doi:10.1063/1.470648
60. Parrinello M (1981) Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys 52:7182. doi:10.1063/1.328693
61. Patra M, Karttunen M, Hyvönen MT, Falck E, Vattulainen I (2004) Lipid bilayers driven to a wrong lane in molecular dynamics simulations by subtle changes in long-range electrostatic interactions. J Phys Chem B 108:4485-4494. doi:10.1021/jp031281a
62. Langham A, Kaznessis YN (2010) Molecular simulations of antimicrobial peptides. Methods Mol Biol 618:267-285. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-594-1_17
63. Venturoli M, Smit B (1999) Simulating the self-assembly of model membranes. Phys Chem Comm 2:45. doi:10.1039/a906472i
64. Peter Tieleman D, Hess B, Sansom MSP (2002) Analysis and evaluation of channel models: simulations of alamethicin. Biophys J 83:2393-2407. http://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0006349502752533. Accessed 7 Aug 2013
65. Thøgersen L, Schiøtt B, Vosegaard T, Nielsen NC, Tajkhorshid E (2008) Peptide aggregation and pore formation in a lipid bilayer: a combined coarse-grained and all atom molecular dynamics study. Biophys J 95:4337-4347. http://www. pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid =2567951&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstr act. Accessed 7 Aug 2013
66. Gkeka P, Sarkisov L (2009) Spontaneous formation of a barrel-stave pore in a coarse-grained model of the synthetic LS3 peptide and a DPPC lipid bilayer. J Phys Chem B 113:6-8. doi:10.1021/jp808417a
67. Woo H-J, Wallqvist A (2011) Spontaneous buckling of lipid bilayer and vesicle budding induced by antimicrobial peptide magainin 2: a coarse-grained simulation study. J Phys Chem B 115:8122-8129. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/21651300. Accessed 7 Aug 2013
68. Perrin BS, Tian Y, Fu R, Grant C V, Chekmenev EY et al (2014) High-resolution structures and orientations of antimicrobial peptides piscidin 1 and piscidin 3 in fluid bilayers reveal tilting, kinking, and bilayer immersion. J Am Chem Soc. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24410116. Accessed 14 Feb 2014
69. Parton DL, Akhmatskaya EV, Sansom MSP (2012) Multiscale simulations of the antimicrobial peptide maculatin 1.1: water permeation through disordered aggregates. J Phys Chem B 116:8485-8493. doi:10.1021/jp 212358y
70. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2000) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; M7-A5, 5th edn. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA