The Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS): Reliability, convergent validity, and internal responsiveness for two scoring systems

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 231-238

  Martini, Rose ^a   Rios, Jorge ^b   Polatajko, Helene ^c   Wolf, Timothy ^d   McEwen, Sara ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b Canada   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Development coordination disorder; Outcome measures; Performance quality rating scale; PQRS; Psychometric properties; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CANADA; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STROKE; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; CANADA; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84921769484     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.913702     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Dawson DR, Gaya A, Hunt A, et al. Using the cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance approach with adults with traumatic brain injury. Can J Occup Ther 2009;76:115-27.
2. McEwen SE, Polatajko HJ, Huijbregts MPJ, Ryan JD. Inter-task transfer of meaningful, functional skills following a cognitive-based treatment: results of three multiple baseline design experiments in adults with chronic stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2010;20:541-61.
3. McEwen SE, Polatajko HJ, Huijbregts MP, Ryan JD. Exploring a cognitive-based treatment approach to improve motor-based skill performance in chronic stroke: results of three single case experiments. Brain Inj 2009;23:1041-53.
4. Miller L, Polatajko HJ, Missiuna C, et al. A pilot of a cognitive treatment for children with developmental coordination disorder. Human Mov Sci 2001;20:183-210.
5. Law M, Baptiste S, McColl MA, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1990;57:82-7.
6. Forbes DA. Goal attainment scaling. A responsive measure of client outcomes. J Gerontol Nurs 1998;24:34-40.
7. Lemmens RJ, Timmermans AA, Janssen-Potten YJ, et al. Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review. BMC Neurol 2012;12:21.
8. Martini R, Polatajko H. Verbal self-guidance as a treatment approach for children with developmental coordination disorder: a systematic replication study. Occupat Therap J Res 1998;18:157-81.
9. Phelan S, Steinke L, Mandich A. Exploring a cognitive intervention for children with pervasive developmental disorder. Can J Occup Ther 2009;76:23-8.
10. Polatajko HJ, McEwen SE, Ryan JD, Baum CM. Pilot randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive strategy use to improve goal performance after stroke. Am J Occup Ther 2012;66:104-9.
11. Rodger S, Ireland S, Vun M. Can cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP) help children with Asperger's syndrome to master social and organisational goals? Br J Occup Ther 2008;71:23-32.
12. Gowland C, VanHullenaar S, Torresin W, et al. Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment. Development, validation, and administration manual. Hamilton, ON: Chedoke-McMaster Hospitals and McMaster University; 1995.
13. Martini R, Mandich A, Green D. (2014) Implementing a modified cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance approach for use in a group format. Br J Occup Ther 2014;77:214-19.
14. Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement assessment battery for children - second edition (movement ABC-2). London, UK: The Psychological Corporation; 2007.
15. Phipps S, Richardson P. Occupational therapy outcomes for clients with traumatic brain injury and stroke using the Canadian occupational performance measure. Am J Occup Ther 2007;61:328-34.
16. Law M, Darrah J, Pollock N, et al. Focus on function - a randomized controlled trial comparing two rehabilitation interventions for young children with cerebral palsy. BMC Pediatr 2007;7:31.
17. Eyssen IC, Beelen A, Dedding C, et al. The reproducibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19:888-94.
18. Law M, Babtiste S, Carswell-Opzoomer A, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, 3th ed. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE; 1998.
19. Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: the bare essentials, 3rd ed. Toronto, Canada: BC Decker; 2007.
20. Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res 1998;7:301-17.
21. Bragante KC, Nascimento DM, Motta NW. Evaluation of acute radiation effects on mandibular movements of patients with head and neck cancer. Rev Bras Fisioter 2012;16:141-7.
22. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:459-68.
23. Meek GE, Ozgur C, Dunning K. Comparison of the t vs. Wilcoxon signed-rank test for Likert scale data and small samples. J Modern Appl Statist Meth [Internet]. Revised 2007;6:91-106.
24. Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res 2001;10:571-8.
25. Lexell JE, Downham DY. How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:719-23.
26. Lu WS, Wang CH, Lin JH, et al. The minimal detectable change of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement measure. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:615-19.
27. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Publications; 2006.
28. Jones G, Noble ADL, Schauer B, Cogger N. Measuring the attenuation in a subject-specific random effect with paired data. J Data Sci 2009;7:179-88.
29. Pitman-Morgan Test: test the difference between correlated variances. Available from: http://how2stats.blogspot.ca/2011/06/testing-difference-between-correlated.html [last accessed 14 Oct 2013].
30. Middel B, van Sonderen E. Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research. Int J Integr Care 2002;2:e15 (2-18).
31. Wang CY, Sheu CF, Protas EJ. Test-retest reliability and measurement errors of six mobility tests in the community-dwelling elderly. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr 2009;4:8-13.
32. Cup EH, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Thijssen MC, van Kuyk-Minis MA. Reliability and validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:402-9.
33. Chan CCH, Lee TMC. Validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure. Occupat Therap Int 1997;4:231-49.
34. Uswatte G, Hobbs Qadri L. A behavioral observation system for quantifying arm activity in daily life after stroke. Rehabil Psychol 2009;54:398-403.