Comparison of the t vs. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test for likert scale data and small samples

Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 91-106

  Meek, Gary E ^a,d   Ozgur, Ceyhun ^b,e   Dunning, Kenneth ^c,e  

^a BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^d CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Department of Information/Decision Sciences ^*

Author keywords

Likert scales; Nonparametric; One sample t test; Type I and Type II error rates; Wilcoxon's signed rank test

Indexed keywords

EID: 48249094628     PISSN: 15389472     EISSN: 15389472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22237/jmasm/1177992540     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. th ed.). Mason, OH: Southwestern Publishing Co.
2. Baggaley, Andrew R. (1960). Some remarks on scales of measurement and related topics. The Journal of General Psychology, 62, 141-145.
3. th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Publishing Co.
4. Blair, R. C., & Higgins, J. J. (1985). Comparison of the power of the paired samples t test to that of Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test under various population shapes. Psychological Bulletin, 97(1), 119-128.
5. Bowerman, B. & O'Connell, R. (2007). Business statistics in practice. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin Publishing Co.
6. Bradley, J. V. (1968). Distribution free statistical tests. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Publishing Co.
7. Bradley, J. V. (1980). Nonrobustness in one-sample Z and t tests: A large-scale sampling study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 29-32.
8. Chou, Y. L. (1989). Statistical analysis for business and economics. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
9. Conover, W. J. (1971). Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Doane, D. & Seward, L. (2007) Applied statistics in business and economics. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin Publishing Co.
11. Harris, R. J. (1975). A primer of multivariate statistics. New York: Academic Press.
12. Heeren, T.& D'Agostino, R. (1987). Robustness of the two independent samples when applied to ordinal scale data. Statistics in Medicine, 6, 79-90
13. th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Publishing Co.
14. Meek, G., Ozgur, C. & Dunning, K. (2000). Does scale of measurement really make a difference in test selection: An empirical comparison of t test vs. Mann Whitney. Proceedings of the 2000 National Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, 951-953.
15. Meek, G., Ozgur, C. & Dunning, K. (2001). Does scale of measurement really make a difference in test selection: The one-sample case, t vs. Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Proceedings of the 2001 National Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, 1280 (abstract).
16. Moore, D., McCabe, G., Duckworth, W. & Sclove, S. (2003) The practice of business statistics: using data for decisions. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Co.
17. 2 vs the rank transform with real Likert data. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 1(1) 83-99.
18. Nanna, M. J., & Sawilowsky, S. S. (1998). Analysis of Likert scale data in disability and medical rehabilitation research. Psychological Methods, 3(1), 55-67.
19. th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
20. Russel, C. J. & Bobko, P. (1992). Moderated regression analysis and Likert scales: Too coarse. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, (3), 336-342.
21. Sawilowsky, S. S. (1991). Comments on using alternatives to normal theory statistics in social and behavioral sciences. Canadian Psychology, 34(4), 432-433.
22. Sawilowsky, S. S. (2005). Misconceptions leading to choosing the t test over the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test for shift in location parameter. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 4(2), 598-600.
23. Sawilowsky, S. S. (1990). Nonparametric tests of interaction in experimental design. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 91-126.
24. Sawilowsky, S. S. & Blair, R. C. (1992). A more realistic look at the robustness and type II error properties of the t test to departures from population normality. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 352-360
25. Siegel, S. (1956) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
26. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677-680.